• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Riots erupt in Tehran over 'stolen' election

And this is precisely why they will fail.

Don't be so quick to write them off. 300,000 people with sticks, stones, knives, and molotov cocktails are not unarmed. They can quickly shut a city down and overwhelm police stations and militia headquarters and seize more weapons.
 
Don't be so quick to write them off. 300,000 people with sticks, stones, knives, and molotov cocktails are not unarmed. They can quickly shut a city down and overwhelm police stations and militia headquarters and seize more weapons.

I hope they succeed, but I doubt they will. Sticks, stones, knives and molotov cocktails aren't much of a match for automatic weapons, tanks and helicopters.
 
Anyone who twitters, set your date and time to Tehran to help the protesters hide from the Iranian gov. They're tracking down tweeters by date and time and trying to shut them down.
 
I hope they succeed, but I doubt they will. Sticks, stones, knives and molotov cocktails aren't much of a match for automatic weapons, tanks and helicopters.

True, but they said the same thing in 1979 I imagine no?
 
I hope they succeed, but I doubt they will. Sticks, stones, knives and molotov cocktails aren't much of a match for automatic weapons, tanks and helicopters.
Superior killing technology didn't save the Shah.
 
Don't be so quick to write them off. 300,000 people with sticks, stones, knives, and molotov cocktails are not unarmed. They can quickly shut a city down and overwhelm police stations and militia headquarters and seize more weapons.

Media reports have claimed as many as 1 million demonstrating in Tehran, but reports on the ground have asserted as many as 3 million people. Media reports on issues like this are almost always underestimated, and the amount of people coming out to demonstrate in the streets in Tehran alone I would say is at least 2 million; this does not include the millions throughout the rest of the country coming out as well.

Media reports have also stated that 17 people have been killed but sources on the ground are reporting estimates as high as 30 so far. To be honest, there's really no way to tell if the 30 estimate is accurate or if there have actually been more, but I know for a fact that more than 17 have been killed. Hundreds have also been taken prisoner.
 
Media reports have claimed as many as 1 million demonstrating in Tehran, but reports on the ground have asserted as many as 3 million people. Media reports on issues like this are almost always underestimated, and the amount of people coming out to demonstrate in the streets in Tehran alone I would say is at least 2 million; this does not include the millions throughout the rest of the country coming out as well.

Media reports have also stated that 17 people have been killed but sources on the ground are reporting estimates as high as 30 so far. To be honest, there's really no way to tell if the 30 estimate is accurate or if there have actually been more, but I know for a fact that more than 17 have been killed. Hundreds have also been taken prisoner.

Right on, my number was deliberately low. I've been following this closely and am so very, but cautiously, optimistic for the Iranian people. For a few years now I've been discussing the undercurrent of the Velvet Revolution in Iran, but there recent events have served as a catalyst for what appears to be a full scale rebellion in it's infancy right now.

Now, make no mistake about Mir-Hossein Mousavi, he's not simply waiting to be the west's new best friend. However he holds the greatest promise, if he can actually implement his policies, to changing Iran's course and dramatically improving relations with the U.S. and other nations. I particularly like his stance on the allowance of privately owned television and the free flow of information to the people, woman's rights, and abolishing the Moral Police. But we just need to keep in mind this guy also has history in terms of his participation in the rule of Iran after the 1979 Revolution and during the Iran-Iraq war as well as with Lebanon's Hezbollah party.

All in all however I think he's a much better choice for the people than what they've had. And once the cork is out of the bottle I think that the fundamental and extremist theocracy that is in power now will be short lived.
 
Now, make no mistake about Mir-Hossein Mousavi, he's not simply waiting to be the west's new best friend. However he holds the greatest promise, if he can actually implement his policies, to changing Iran's course and dramatically improving relations with the U.S. and other nations. I particularly like his stance on the allowance of privately owned television and the free flow of information to the people, woman's rights, and abolishing the Moral Police. But we just need to keep in mind this guy also has history in terms of his participation in the rule of Iran after the 1979 Revolution and during the Iran-Iraq war as well as with Lebanon's Hezbollah party.

Mousavi is not a radical or a reformist. Mousavi is a politician. He has made promises that I can guarantee that he is not willing to keep, from a lot of the liberal reform promises to his promotion of freedom and democracy in general. Mousavi is first and foremost in the pocket of the Ayatollah and the religious leaders of the country. This must be kept in mind; it is for this reason that his reform promises will not be carried out if he actually does become president.

It should also be kept in mind that initially Mousavi came out on the side of the religious leadership and against the demonstrators, initially telling them not to demonstrate. Once he saw the power of the demonstrations and the determination of the Iranian people to demonstrate in defiance of the ban, he shifted his position to supporting peaceful demonstrations. He has now moved so far away from the position of the religious leadership as to demand a new election.

This, however, must be analyzed very critically; Mousavi, as I have said before, does not have very radical interests and is not a reformist. He is attempting to capitalize on the rage of the people in order to further his political power and aspirations. He is also acting to contain the movement from spilling over into a more general movement against the dictatorship and the government in general (as he is a part of that dictatorship/government). Mousavi should not be supported for this very reason, and should be opposed on all fronts. His only desire is to contain this movement and to steer it to further his own political objectives. He is an opportunist.

Here's an excerpt from an article we have published:

Rise of the Iranian People said:
Our position, then, is not based on whether or not the elections were legitimate, but rather the fact that the electoral system itself is illegitimate. It is also based on the fact that both Mousavi and Ahmedinejad represent different sections of the ruling classes in Iranian society, and thus to support either candidate is a mistake. The Nation, for example, has come out to support Mousavi, and was rightfully criticized by World Socialist Web Site for these reasons.

The people of Iran have come out to demonstrate by the millions, defying a government ban on demonstrations and risking their lives in the process. They have come out to contest not only the election results, but also the electoral system in general, and are quickly being further radicalized in the process. As they gain experience and confidence, and as they become increasingly more conscious of the situation unfolding, they have become bolder and more radical. There is a genuine possibility for this movement to radicalize even further, and to perhaps even become revolutionary.

We recognize the fact that many demonstrating are currently in support of Mousavi, and that Mousavi is attempting to capitalize on this dissent by co-opting the movement for his own political gain and for the purpose of containing it. However, consciousness is developed through struggle, and we will continue to support the Iranian demonstrators in their struggle with the genuine hope that they are able to move beyond Mousavi’s trap to emancipate themselves from the autocratic regime and put forward not only an anti-dictatorial, but also a revolutionary solution.

Rise of the Iranian People

Mousavi is part of the problem, not the solution.
 
There's better coverage of the riots on youtube than cable. :shock:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSECAvBTanQ]YouTube - Riot police caught by crowd - Protests in Tehran after election[/ame]
 
There's a reason that the police in Iran are confiscating laptops, cell phones, and cameras...
 
Mousavi is the Ayatollahs hand picked man.
Even if for some reason the Ayatollah decides to back him it will change nothing.

Well it will change one thing..many in the west foolishly believe Mousavi is some big time reformer when he is not at all...so you'll get fawning adoration for a fake reformer and Iran will continue doing whats its doing just more certain the foolish west is foolish.
 
Well it will change one thing..many in the west foolishly believe Mousavi is some big time reformer when he is not at all...so you'll get fawning adoration for a fake reformer and Iran will continue doing whats its doing just more certain the foolish west is foolish.

Well he is friendlier towards the west, as he represents a section of the upper class that could benefit financially very much from friendlier relations between Iran and the US. This is also one reason why we see many westerners supporting Mousavi.

BTW I think that's the first time I've ever thanked you.:shock:
 
Mousavi is not a radical or a reformist. Mousavi is a politician. He has made promises that I can guarantee that he is not willing to keep, from a lot of the liberal reform promises to his promotion of freedom and democracy in general. Mousavi is first and foremost in the pocket of the Ayatollah and the religious leaders of the country. This must be kept in mind; it is for this reason that his reform promises will not be carried out if he actually does become president.

It should also be kept in mind that initially Mousavi came out on the side of the religious leadership and against the demonstrators, initially telling them not to demonstrate. Once he saw the power of the demonstrations and the determination of the Iranian people to demonstrate in defiance of the ban, he shifted his position to supporting peaceful demonstrations. He has now moved so far away from the position of the religious leadership as to demand a new election.

This, however, must be analyzed very critically; Mousavi, as I have said before, does not have very radical interests and is not a reformist. He is attempting to capitalize on the rage of the people in order to further his political power and aspirations. He is also acting to contain the movement from spilling over into a more general movement against the dictatorship and the government in general (as he is a part of that dictatorship/government). Mousavi should not be supported for this very reason, and should be opposed on all fronts. His only desire is to contain this movement and to steer it to further his own political objectives. He is an opportunist.

Here's an excerpt from an article we have published:



Mousavi is part of the problem, not the solution.

Thank you for the insight. Who do all think holds the best hope for Iran? Certainly you won't suggest a communist will you?
 
Thank you for the insight. Who do all think holds the best hope for Iran? Certainly you won't suggest a communist will you?

Currently it really isn't a question that can be answered. It really depends on how this movement develops. I know for a fact though that simply supporting Mousavi because he seems more progressive than Ahmedinejad is a pretty opportunist and ultimately pessimistic position to take.
 
Currently it really isn't a question that can be answered. It really depends on how this movement develops. I know for a fact though that simply supporting Mousavi because he seems more progressive than Ahmedinejad is a pretty opportunist and ultimately pessimistic position to take.

Well I agree with you, but the last thing we want is to eject a theocracy and replace it with a military junta. There has to be someone the Iranian people want in there. They can't simply be leaderless.
 
Khayembii is correct. Mousavi is more polished than Ahmadinejad, but he is part and parcel of the extended dictatorship.
 
Khayembii is correct. Mousavi is more polished than Ahmadinejad, but he is part and parcel of the extended dictatorship.

So you all are saying that the people of Iran had a choice between evil, and evil? Grossly oversimplified, but that is about what you guys are saying?
 
Khayembii is correct. Mousavi is more polished than Ahmadinejad, but he is part and parcel of the extended dictatorship.

So who else is there? There has to be opposition candidates that the people are behind who stand for true change. Everything I've read on Mousavi is that he stands for reform, woman's rights, freedom of information, etc. If this is all just lip service then that is fine, but is this opinion or does he have a track record to counter his proclaimed position? I honestly don't know much about this man.

One thing is for certain, somebody needs to be stood up rather quickly in order to take advantage of this opportunity on behalf of the Iranian people.
 
Khayembii is correct. Mousavi is more polished than Ahmadinejad, but he is part and parcel of the extended dictatorship.

Well, if I had to choose between typoid and a very bad flu, I'd take the flu. Same goes with the Lebanese elections.
 
Well he is friendlier towards the west, as he represents a section of the upper class that could benefit financially very much from friendlier relations between Iran and the US. This is also one reason why we see many westerners supporting Mousavi.

BTW I think that's the first time I've ever thanked you.:shock:

The Communist and the Nationalist agreeing for the most part about Iran while people who should know better on the left and the right falling over each other trying to float a fantasy.

That's the way the cookie crumbles atm in this screwy world.

Like that old saying "**** happens"
 
So you all are saying that the people of Iran had a choice between evil, and evil? Grossly oversimplified, but that is about what you guys are saying?

Well, if you follow Iranian politics, at least their electoral process, it's pretty easy to see how the choices can be made for the people. The Guardian Council decides who will be allowed to run for the office of president, and have a history of suppressing opposition and only allowing those they can puppet to actually be eligible for election.
 
Well, if you follow Iranian politics, at least their electoral process, it's pretty easy to see how the choices can be made for the people. The Guardian Council decides who will be allowed to run for the office of president, and have a history of suppressing opposition and only allowing those they can puppet to actually be eligible for election.

I don't follow Iranian politics, so am pretty ignorant. Right now I am just mostly concerned for the poor young people in Iran.
 
The Communist and the Nationalist agreeing for the most part about Iran while people who should know better on the left and the right falling over each other trying to float a fantasy.

Please explain this fantasy you are speaking of.
 
Back
Top Bottom