- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 5,289
- Reaction score
- 2,294
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I hope so, but he will do what he has to do.He should keep his head down and his powder dry.
I hope so, but he will do what he has to do.He should keep his head down and his powder dry.
I hope so, but he will do what he has to do.
Unless you're in Iran, this is not your fight.Surviving under the thumb of the Iranian Religious Police and the Revolutionary Guard, isn't surviving, it's like living like a scurrying cockroach. I will fight! I repeat it sir I will fight! As for me, give me liberty or give me death.
I need to see bullets fly from the "reformers" or whomever to believe this has a chance at all of going beyond this.
Government shoots some people its right back to ["will lead to nothing but some bad times for some of those who took part." imo.
it's not like the tianmen. it's all over the country now.
The Iranian People Speak
By Ken Ballen and Patrick Doherty
Monday, June 15, 2009
The election results in Iran may reflect the will of the Iranian people. Many experts are claiming that the margin of victory of incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the result of fraud or manipulation, but our nationwide public opinion survey of Iranians three weeks before the vote showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin -- greater than his actual apparent margin of victory in Friday's election.
While Western news reports from Tehran in the days leading up to the voting portrayed an Iranian public enthusiastic about Ahmadinejad's principal opponent, Mir Hossein Mousavi, our scientific sampling from across all 30 of Iran's provinces showed Ahmadinejad well ahead.
Ken Ballen and Patrick Doherty - Polling in Iran Shows Real Support for Ahmadinejad
I have been thinking "FRAUD" since the results were announced. However, this article in today's Washington Post made me question it. I'm not saying there's no fraud, but this article has given me pause.
In the run-up to the campaign, polls had put both men neck-and-neck, with some suggesting that Mr Ahmadinejad was in for a shock defeat because of his poor economic performance and aggression to the West.
The thought had crossed my mind that this could be possible. However according to the Telegraph
Iran elections: revolt as crowds protest at Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 'rigged' victory - Telegraph
Obviously the poll you presented said something quite different but that is not unusual with polls.
I know early Saturday morning the thing that made people sure it was rigged was because of the size of his majority. This, it seems to Mousavi's supporters, was totally unexpected.
Even the report you presented said that the people were wanting Changes like Mousavi was promising. It would seem a strange choice if that is so....but of course it is always possible.
In about-face, Khamenei backs vote fraud probe
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ordered the powerful Guardian Council to examine the allegations by pro-reform candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, who has claimed widespread vote rigging in Friday's election. The government declared President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the winner in a landslide victory.
It was a stunning turnaround for Iran's most powerful figure, who previously welcomed the results.
Fraud probe ordered into Iran vote - Iran- msnbc.com
I agree with you. It looks like an investigation will occur. It will be interesting to see what happens with this.
I doubt those riots will lead to a revolution or anything.
The people of Iran will get tired from this in a few days,
and then life under the dictatorship will go back to normal.
Well Khamenei has called for an investigation now. So either it'll be a whitewash, or they see something real that the opposition can prove.Is there any actual evidence that voter fraud has happened or might have happened like voter registration fraud, videos of the same people voting in multiple polling locations,electronic voting machines that leave no paper trial,dumped ballots and etc? Or are these people just pissed that their guy lost so they are rioting with the hope that their government will be intimidated into seating the candidate the rioters want? I ask these questions because the only thing the article mentions is a bunch of people who are pissed off because their guy lost and the claims of a political analyst, which doesn't equal evidence of any fraud.
Well Khamenei has called for an investigation now. So either it'll be a whitewash, or they see something real that the opposition can prove.
Are you for real?He has called for calm, so an "investigation" can be held. When that "investigation" discovers no wrongdoing, the results will quietly be announced to a now-calm electorate. Iran has learned much about how to rig an election in a democracy, they must be watching the US.
Are you for real?
The Iranians know how to rig an election?
The results were simply the opposite from what was shown in the polls, how is that so professional? :doh
Exit Polls and Voter Fraud: A User-Friendly ExplanationIn the crucial state of Ohio, we see Kerry with a steady lead all day. When the polls close, all eyes are on Ohio, and the unauthorized numbers on the internet have Kerry ahead by 2 points. Then CNN posts exit poll data showing Kerry up by a good 4 points. Somehow, Bush pulls off a mysterious 6 point gain and wins by 2 points.
Meanwhile, down in Florida, 1.6 million more people were voting for President than had done so in 2000, the year that Bush and Gore essentially tied. Exit polls showed more new voters were going for Kerry, as predicted, and far fewer voting for Nader this time. Not surprisingly, Kerry was slightly ahead all day and ended with a 2 point lead. But of course, Bush won. And not by one or two points, as he did in Ohio and New Mexico. In Florida, where vote-tallying machines have been seen counting backwards, Bush gained a full 7 points on his exit polls and beat Kerry by 5 points.