• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Riots erupt in Tehran over 'stolen' election

Tashah

DP Veteran
Joined
May 25, 2005
Messages
18,379
Reaction score
9,233
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Centrist
Riots erupt in Tehran over 'stolen' election
Ian Black and Saeed Kamali Dehghan in Tehran
Saturday 13 June 2009

Iran is facing political turmoil after hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was confirmed today as the winner of the presidential election and outraged supporters of his chief rival took to the streets to protest against a "dangerous charade" after a record 85% turnout. Tonight riot police in Tehran faced thousands of angry demonstrators shouting "death to dictatorship" amid shock and confusion after the official result backed Ahmadinejad's claim to have won, made barely an hour after the polls closed on Friday night.

"The regime is making a decision to shape the direction of Iran for the next decade," a political analyst, Saeed Laylaz, said. "I'm sure they didn't even count the votes. I do not accept this result. It is false. It should be the opposite. If Ahmadinejad is president again Iran will be more isolated and more aggressive. But he is the choice of the regime." Laylaz had warned before the result that a second presidential term for Ahmadinejad could create a "Tiananmen"-type situation in Iran after an outpouring of popular enthusiasm for his rival in Tehran and in other cities.

Overt signs of repression included the failure of phone lines for hours after the polls closed and the blocking of the English and Persian-language websites of the BBC and the Voice of America - which are regularly attacked by the Iranian government as "imperialist." SMS messaging also failed. Foreign diplomats scrambled to make sense of the reversal. Fraud had been expected but not on the apparently massive scale required to produce an outcome almost diametrically opposite to what had been predicted by the Mousavi camp and independent analysts.

Friday's excitement in the opposition camp gave way to fury. "It's shameful, they have rigged the polls," said technician Majidreza Askari. "What would you expect from the interior ministry of a liar president? Ahmadinejad lies in front of the whole nation on state-run TV." Samaneh Younes, a nurse demonstrating in Vanak Square, Tehran, tonight, said: "How is it possible that Mousavi didn't even get good results in his own province? How is it possible that there were no blank votes? Why didn't the government provide enough ballot papers in big cities where Mousavi had a huge number amount of supporters?"
Source: guardian.co.uk

The scale of the fraud committed here is simply astounding.
 
To much of this sort of thing might result in a civil war.
 
To much of this sort of thing might result in a civil war.
One has to wonder if that wouldn't be a problem solver for the western world and Iran itself, if it brought about a more freedom centered government for the Iranians constantly abused by the standing government there. I would hope it wouldn't be necessary because of the loss of innocent life of course, but if civil war cannot be stopped, at least some good could come from it.
 
To much of this sort of thing might result in a civil war.

Nah, not gonna happen. The grip of the Mullah's is far stronger then most people want to believe.
 
Nah, not gonna happen. The grip of the Mullah's is far stronger then most people want to believe.

Perhaps.

The tipping point might be further than I personally or many others collectively would tolerate, but it seems to me that it would still exist.
 
May the people remain safe, and may their will prevail.
 
This could get messy very fast I hope that we see a peaceful march but I fear that the Republican Guard units will be used to put down any un-rest if this happen's I could see certain Military Units come out on the side of the Green Revolution.
 
From the article; I found this interesting:
Overt signs of repression included the failure of phone lines for hours after the polls closed and the blocking of the English and Persian-language websites of the BBC and the Voice of America - which are regularly attacked by the Iranian government as "imperialist." SMS messaging also failed.

Trying to cut their communications, eh?
 
Source: guardian.co.uk

The scale of the fraud committed here is simply astounding.

Hey, this kind of reminds me of what happened back during the 2000-2001 American presidential polls.....well without the violence of course....but almost the same type of corruption. Anyone else see scary similarities?

At least it's a good thing to know that America isn't the only government which is corrupt.
 
Will end the same way the College 'riot' ended a few years ago. If it doesn't just fade away in a day or two..which is most likely.

Ring leaders will be hung, agitators imprisoned.... rest will melt away.



Iran will continue to develop nuclear weapons, call for the extermination of Jews, the destruction of the USA, openly support terrorists, etc ..and Obama will do nothing but pose for cameras.
 
Last edited:
Hey, this kind of reminds me of what happened back during the 2000-2001 American presidential polls.....well without the violence of course....but almost the same type of corruption. Anyone else see scary similarities?

At least it's a good thing to know that America isn't the only government which is corrupt.

It is not even close to the same thing. If fraud was as massive in 2000 do you really think the official results would have been so close? In Iran they didn't even count the votes, they just made up some BS numbers.
 
Hey, this kind of reminds me of what happened back during the 2000-2001 American presidential polls.....well without the violence of course....but almost the same type of corruption. Anyone else see scary similarities?

At least it's a good thing to know that America isn't the only government which is corrupt.

No it doesn't not even close but nice try to bring in something that is way off topic as a matter of fact I call:bs and trolling
 
Damn I was going to say (judging from only the start of the video) that their police seem to handle crowds in a much less thuggish way than our American. But by the end you see that all riot cops are the same... Paycheck + a free get your beat on session for others silence.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ2V-GyRYvc]YouTube - Iranian Election Riots 2009 [Raw Video][/ame]


No debate just sharin'.
 
Will end the same way the College 'riot' ended a few years ago. If it doesn't just fade away in a day or two..which is most likely.

Ring leaders will be hung, agitators imprisoned.... rest will melt away.



Iran will continue to develop nuclear weapons, call for the extermination of Jews, the destruction of the USA, openly support terrorists, etc ..and Obama will do nothing but pose for cameras.

instead, Obama should [fill in the blank triad]
 
Reports: Turmoil grips Iran as reform candidate arrested

Poll watchers in Iran's election report that Moussavi got 65% of the vote.

The Mullah's give the election to Ahmedinejad, and claim that Moussave only got 28% of the vote.

How does one solve a huge discrepancy like that? Easy. Arrest the candidate who really won, and wage a brutal crackdown on his supporters. How good of a strategy is that? It depends on the integrity of the people. I have a feeling that the Spirit of Philadelphia has returned, this time making a visit to Iran. The Mullahs have become the new King George III. Freedom for the Iranian people may not happen overnight, but it will eventually come. More than 200 years ago, Americans showed that, no matter how mightily armed the suppressor is, it cannot keep the people down forever, and that eventually, they will rise up and overthrow tyranny. I am optimistic that this is exactly what is going to happen in Iran. As Americans, we should support and encourage the overthrow of Iran's tyrants. My best wishes go out to the Iranian people. May they one day prevail, and soon.

Iran is in turmoil and the country’s political scene is undergoing moment-by-moment changes following Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s landslide victory in yesterday’s presidential elections, with evidence growing of a brutal government crackdown on supporters of reformist opposition candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi.
Article is here.
 
It is not even close to the same thing. If fraud was as massive in 2000 do you really think the official results would have been so close? In Iran they didn't even count the votes, they just made up some BS numbers.

So you say their votes weren't even counted because a member of the losing party said so? Are there actual facts supporting those accusations? I haven't seen any, just accusations from the losing party. True, maybe our voting corruption in the 2000-2001 elections wasn't quite as bad, but it was still there, making my point valid.
 
So you say their votes weren't even counted because a member of the losing party said so? Are there actual facts supporting those accusations? I haven't seen any, just accusations from the losing party. True, maybe our voting corruption in the 2000-2001 elections wasn't quite as bad, but it was still there, making my point valid.

Has there been any election, ever, without at least SOME corruption?

Further, has there been a US election in the past 50 years that had only slight corruption?
 
No it doesn't not even close but nice try to bring in something that is way off topic as a matter of fact I call:bs and trolling

So you're telling me that there was no corruption in the 2000-2001 elections? How is that a bs statement? My statement was "almost the same type of corruption", which in a given sense holds true. Maybe not to the extent they have in Iran right now, but along the same lines.
 
Has there been any election, ever, without at least SOME corruption?

Further, has there been a US election in the past 50 years that had only slight corruption?

That is my point, I just used the 2000-2001 elections as an example. Stating that there are similarities amongst the election in Iran.
 
Re: Reports: Turmoil grips Iran as reform candidate arrested

Poll watchers in Iran's election report that Moussavi got 65% of the vote.

The Mullah's give the election to Ahmedinejad, and claim that Moussave only got 28% of the vote.

How does one solve a huge discrepancy like that? Easy. Arrest the candidate who really won, and wage a brutal crackdown on his supporters. How good of a strategy is that? It depends on the integrity of the people. I have a feeling that the Spirit of Philadelphia has returned, this time making a visit to Iran. The Mullahs have become the new King George III. Freedom for the Iranian people may not happen overnight, but it will eventually come. More than 200 years ago, Americans showed that, no matter how mightily armed the suppressor is, it cannot keep the people down forever, and that eventually, they will rise up and overthrow tyranny. I am optimistic that this is exactly what is going to happen in Iran. As Americans, we should support and encourage the overthrow of Iran's tyrants. My best wishes go out to the Iranian people. May they one day prevail, and soon.

Article is here.


As I have been saying for years; the mullahs, the ayetoiletbowl, and Aminademonjihad, all need to be removed from power.

As long as Ali Komonkey****er is in control there will be no legitimate government in Iran.

Until a fair election is conducted in Iran, I say hit Iran with the same sanctions I proposed for NK.
 
From the article; I found this interesting:

Trying to cut their communications, eh?

I heard on the radio last night tehran non state issued web news was blocked at the state level during the night.

internet was cut off
 
I doubt we'll ever know what happened to this election. Unlike the US, they don't keep records for anyone to unearth later.

From Al Jazeera


Al Jazeera English - Middle East - Poll results prompt Iran protests
Thousands of Iranians have taken to the streets of Tehran in protest against the outcome of the country's elections, in the biggest unrest since the 1979 revolution.

Riot police were deployed in the capital on Saturday after about 3,000 supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi, a reformist candidate, took to the streets following the announcement of his defeat by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the incumbent president.

The protests intensified following a televised speech by Ahmadinejad in which he said the vote had been "completely free" and the outcome was "a great victory" for Iran.

Al Jazeera's Teymoor Nabili, reporting from Tehran, said major streets in the north of the city had come to a standstill.

"Coming up the street there were running battles happening between riot police and students and there were refuse bins alight in the middle of the road," he said.

"I saw riot police hitting students with sticks. I saw students - or young people - throwing stones at the riot police, trying to knock them off their motorcycles.

"But you didn't get a sense that there was any kind of organised movement in this."

Mehran Kamrava, the director of the centre for international and regional studies, at Georgetown University's campus in Qatar, said that protests in northern Tehran were not necessarily an indication of a rigged ballot.

"The western media has been talking to people in north Tehran, who tend to vote overwhelmingly against Ahmadinejad," he told Al Jazeera.

"But let's not forget that many of the urban Iranians have priorities and proclivities that are not necessarily reflected in other areas of the main cities, and those people could easily have voted for Ahmadinejad.

"Iranian politics have proved themselves to be notoriously unpredictable and this could be one of those instances of unpredictability."

But Khameini appeared unlikely to intervene, calling on defeated candidates and their supporters to avoid "provocative behaviour".

<snip>

Iran does not allow international election monitors.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom