Nothing to do with the thread topic?? -- People who are blindly married to their political views -- JUST LIKE THE TEACHER.
O-OOOOHHHH!!! -- That thread topic...
Quote me and prove it. Find a representative sampling of my statements in posts on a variety of social/political issues and ARTICULATE why they appear to have an overall liberal leaning. That's how it works. Get it?
You just friggin' did it again. You completely ignore anything I said leading up to that in order to make your totally stupid insipid remark.
Why not post a counter-argument to the one I made about 'Independent' Scarecrow's lack of independent thought?
Can't you do that???
Again, prove me wrong about what I said, show me Scarecrow's objectivity and independence or stop making foolish troll-like statements.
BTW -- Threads have a life of their own -- Scarecrow didn't mind engaging in me questioning his independence, so for you to say it has nothing to do with the teacher is asinine and Trollish.
At the risk of de-railing the thread with all this personal back and forth, here is my take on your political views:
What is the most telling about your short time on DP is that you rarely call out the Leftists of the forum but are more inclined to attack “conservative” members.
Here’s one of you putting down Drudge and comparing it to the left wing extremist site called the Huffington Post.
Drudge is such a partisan hack. At least Huff Post puts links right to the actual news story.
Here is one of your typical rants against the evils of religion in politics:
Which 'conservative' beliefs?
You got your religious social conservatives -- the real RINO's IMO.
And you got your fiscal Goldwater/Reagan old school conservatives. My type of conservatives.
Great -- give me Mitt Romney without the religion and I'm in 100%.
Cut the ties with the f-ing religious right and lets go to town!!!!
Edit: It was Reagan who opened the door to the Christian folks. Shame on him -- but I guess he felt he needed the votes.
Here is one where you attempt to defend Democrat spending and re-define what someone meant by Liberal spending into one of police, fire and public roads.
The 'government teat' = socialized institutions. We have a few of those. Emergency services. Police departments. Public roads.
The banks and auto industry are government managed bankruptcies and lending. I don't like them. But they are temporary and therefore not socialism.
BTW -- when you start talking russian history, you ignore the fact that we have elections every two years which effect the political power make-up in DC.
Here is one where you defend CNN:
Quote:Originally Posted by Triad
So when someone says CNN is Liberal they are correct.
No, what they are is biased and not very well-informed.
How about this one where you appear happy that the GOP is fading:
I can't say I think this is a good thing. But as long as the GOP continues to allow far-right social conservative to define a major part of their agenda and hyper-partisan pundits to be their voice... Then people are going to move away.
Right after the election there was all this 'right of center' talk. What happened to that? Newt and Rush call Sotomayor a racist--people outside the actual working-in-politics part of the party are ruining it IMO.
Here is one where you go over the top and accuse the teacher who is the subject of this thread of being a “GOP” advocate.
An overly partisan person would have no problem teaching for the last 8 years. But when the country changed and he didn't like it, he stopped being a teacher and became a GOP advocate that happen to work at a high school.
How about more of your typical rants against Hannity and Rush and your version of reality in this thread and gross assumptions based on your own Liberal bisases:
No, this guy is a piss poor history teacher. IMO.
Bush's inauguration didn't have historical significance of Obama's.
He didn't want to interrupt the class?? Because his lecture on how Bush was right on Iraq so much more relevant.:roll: What an ass! When history happens, it's a good idea to stop and watch. And a transcript of a speech is the best way to understand and evaluate a speech. How the heck did this guy get a teaching credential for History?
Like I said, those who can't do... He wants so bad to be Sean Hannity, but the only audience he can get is class of kids forced to listen to him.
I could go on and on; but it begs the question, who did you vote for last election and how are you registered?
Perhaps that will shed a little more light on why you continue to troll Conservative members on DP, make illogical rants against the evil “Christians” and rail against the evil Rushbots and Bushbots yet totally ignore the rabid idiotic rants of the left leaning members of the forum and the illogical rants of Keith Olderman and James Carville.
Taking a little trip through your postings illustrates someone who is more inclined to troll threads than add anything substantive to the debates, yet you want to whine about others trolling; how trite, how simplistic, how arrogant and how ironic.