You admit you're biased toward democrats.
No. I'm a student of the english language and freely admit that I'm biased against any political party that can be so consistently wrong for such an extraordinary length of time and still capture the emotional palpitations of huge masses of mostly ignorant and largely impulsive people.
When they're wrong all the time, should I not build a bias against their perpetual agenda of slavery and disaster?
You believe they are wrong on almost everything.
Are you claiming they're not?
On what evidence?
You also believe you are on the right side of every issue.
No.
I'm right on most issues. That's different than being "on the right side". I'll not fall into your rhetorical traps, thank you very much.
Therefore the side you are not on is wrong.
Amazing how being right makes that happen, isn't it?
Sounds like stubborn and closed-minded.
Sounds like someone, me, is paying careful attention to what's said, what's done, and what happen when things are all said and done.
How about you? How many flawed and failed Democrat initiatives have you supported? Socialist Security? Medicaid? The Great Society? How about federally funded public education, something that, like the other programs I just mentioned, has absolutely zero constitutional basis? Are you proud that the Untied States spends more money per capita student than any other country in history to have the most self-respecting and least educated high school students in the industrialized world? That one of the successes you want to hold up for your Democrat buddies to be proud of?
By being so closed-minded, you are giving up your own free will.
Wow. It's underlined. Is that a book title, in accordance with proper english usage?
The freedom to choose you hold so dear is limited by your inability to consider any position or views held by the Dems. (or not already held by you)
Yes, clearly I don't have freedom to choose because I choose to reject the Democrat message of messianic hope and empty promises backed by socialist Robbin' Hood style economics that have never worked anywhere and won't work here. Clearly because I reject a failed plan I'm not free and must be getting programming instructions from the USB port in my right (of course) elbow, the one that's connected to my humorous nerve. (And, yes, I can spell "humerus" just fine).
How are you 'independent' if you won't even consider candidates from one of the two major parties? Independent means you vote for the candidate and not the party. You can't do that.
Can't I?
How long does it take to see that The Messiah is a callow shallow inexperienced bumbling fool that isn't ready for prime time and that McCain is a left wing RINO the Democrats have been pushing for the GOP nomination for a dozen years? How hard is it to see that my party of registration, the Libertarian Party, has been hijacked by Republicans too incompetent to make a stand in their own party?
BTW, who did I cast a ballot at in 2008? Why?
You've got me pigeon-holed, I'm sure you can puke up an answer without thinking a bit.
The collective thinking you so distain actually run a good part of your life.
"Thinking" is singular, therefore you should be showing us that you have the "runs" in the above sentence.
