Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

  1. #11
    Advisor Don't Tase Me Bro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    11-22-09 @ 08:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    446

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by TBone View Post
    This issue was inherited by many presidents Nuclear Weapons Program - North Korea , so to attach this issue to Obama is stupid.

    What I really find interesting is that of all the members of the so called Axis of Terror, the weakest one was Iraq because their threat to us via WMD, was less than N. Korea and Iran. However, instead of going after N Korea or Iran, we invade Iraq.
    Yep and if Bush hadn't dragged us into that stupid war we would have the resources and the resolve to deal with the real threats in the world. Instead we blew it all on a made up bogeyman.

  2. #12
    User BaZaRr BeAtZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Communist States of America
    Last Seen
    07-23-09 @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    44

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by Triad View Post
    North Korea threatens to 'weaponize' all of its plutonium, enrich uranium | Headlines | Jerusalem Post

    Gee I have an idea lets write them a nasty letter and not sell them stuff. Because that really works...
    kudos for pointing that out. This is the same type of results we have gotten from implementing anti-gun laws in America. All those laws effectively accomplished was the inability for the honest citizen to purchase guns while allowing the criminals to continue to purchase on the black market.

    I'm not saying N. Korea should have nuclear weapons......but who are WE or Russia to say they can't have nukes? Have we all forgotten about the masses of stockpiles that the US and Russia both keep? Then we have the nerve to intervene with other countries and tell them they can't have them? Why? So we can ensure our global domination?

    I say America has enough problems as it is, leave them alone and let someone else be the peace-keepers in the rest of the world. Unless of course, N. Korea attempts an attack on American soil that is. Hell, even while Hitler was attempting to take over Europe, America stayed out of it......at least until the Japanese "Hitler's ally's" attacked Pearl Harbor anyways, THEN we stepped in and took over. Why not use the same principles here? Other countries such as Russia, China, Britain, and Japan could all step in and keep the peace. Let's let them, it's someone else s turn.

  3. #13
    User BaZaRr BeAtZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Communist States of America
    Last Seen
    07-23-09 @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    44

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by Don't Tase Me Bro View Post
    Yep and if Bush hadn't dragged us into that stupid war we would have the resources and the resolve to deal with the real threats in the world. Instead we blew it all on a made up bogeyman.
    Speaking of the resources and resolve to accomplish what you were saying......

    Remember how Hitler eventually lost WW2 and his Nazi empire came crashing down? It was because he had too many fronts he was trying to fight at once. Now we have an Iraqi front, and Afghanistan front, and we have hundreds of thousands of soldiers station across seas in almost every country. Eventually, happening right now as we speak" America will no longer be the superpower because just like Hitler and every other former empire that has failed, we are trying to fight too many wars and aren't concentrated on taking care of our own country. America is destined to fail, probably sooner rather than later if we keep heading in the direction we are right now.

  4. #14
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by American View Post
    I enjoy the trolling, because it has more truth per word than your long winded bloviating. You're just as full of **** as Obama. The empty suit in the Oval Office is too damn scared to make a real decision, one with balls. But you keep worshiping at his alter.
    You really need to work on your smack.

    Interesting how you think I have no truth, but you consistently fail to point out anything I have said that was wrong. Furthermore, you think that posts have have the snot beaten out of them have "truth." And you are excessively hypocritical. You attack me for treating Bush and Obama the same when it comes to the same circumstances and the same options they had, but you do not bash Obama when you give Bush a free pass. If Bush did it, it's okay, but if Obama follows suit, it's horrible. That's hypocrisy as its worst. At least I try to consistently treat politicians who are put in the same position with the same circumstances the same. You don't give a crap, if it's a D following their name automatically bad. If it's a R, it's okay.

    And apparently not voting for him, calling him stimulus a failure and disageeing with his policies means I worship at his alter. You got a messed up view on life.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  5. #15
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by Don't Tase Me Bro View Post
    Bomb Pyongyang off the map. Problem solved.
    So starting a new Korean War, with Seoul and its millions of civilians decimated and risking a nuclear attack on Japan, the US west coast and South Korea is acceptable to you?

    Do you know WHY Bush didn't do that? Because it wasn't acceptable to him.

    Again, Bush and Obama have the SAME options. And these options suck. So why are you people treating them differently?
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  6. #16
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 01:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,736

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    So starting a new Korean War, with Seoul and its millions of civilians decimated and risking a nuclear attack on Japan, the US west coast and South Korea is acceptable to you?

    Do you know WHY Bush didn't do that? Because it wasn't acceptable to him.

    Again, Bush and Obama have the SAME options. And these options suck. So why are you people treating them differently?
    Because they are different persons, have different political views, and most importantly, are/were supported (in many cases) by opposing viewpoints.
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

  7. #17
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by The Mark View Post
    Because they are different persons, have different political views, and most importantly, are/were supported (in many cases) by opposing viewpoints.
    And that changes the options how?

    Oh wait. It does not.

    It does not matter if they are different people, have different views and are supported by different viewpoints when the same options and outcomes exist and both deem them unacceptable.

    Bush did not act because the consequences were too high. Guess why Obama's not acting? Because the consequences are too high.

    So why should we treat them any differently?
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  8. #18
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 01:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,736

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    And that changes the options how?

    Oh wait. It does not.

    It does not matter if they are different people, have different views and are supported by different viewpoints when the same options and outcomes exist and both deem them unacceptable.

    Bush did not act because the consequences were too high. Guess why Obama's not acting? Because the consequences are too high.

    So why should we treat them any differently?
    Ok, ok, the real reason.

    Because ignoring your logic gave people a reason to criticize Pres. Bush, and gives people a reason to criticize Pres. Obama.

    It's alot more fun (plus it makes you feel smarter) to say "Why not do this!", than it is to admit that very little can be done.
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

  9. #19
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by The Mark View Post
    Ok, ok, the real reason.

    Because ignoring your logic gave people a reason to criticize Pres. Bush, and gives people a reason to criticize Pres. Obama.
    And those people are scum. Bashing a candidate for one activity is one thing. Bashing another you don't like for the same activity you gave a pass to your candidate is a sign of severe inconsistent beliefs. There are way too many of these people running around right now.

    It's alot more fun (plus it makes you feel smarter) to say "Why not do this!", than it is to admit that very little can be done.
    I suppose. But how many people here have given a realistic alternative? Hell, all Triad does is bash without giving a single realistic alternative.

    If we should be blaming anyone, it's the Politburo at the PRC.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  10. #20
    User BaZaRr BeAtZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Communist States of America
    Last Seen
    07-23-09 @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    44

    Re: NKorea says it will 'weaponize' its plutonium

    Quote Originally Posted by Don't Tase Me Bro View Post
    Bomb Pyongyang off the map. Problem solved.
    So because we don't agree with other country's political views, we should drop a nuke on them? If I remember correctly, the poll showing citizen support for the American government was just over 50%, but the poll showing N.Korea's support for their government was over 90%. So something tells me there are facts that our government doesn't want our citizens to know. Maybe it's because we want to bully other countries and tell them they can't have nukes, when our country has more nukes stockpiled than any other country in the world.......??

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •