Carrie Prejean Stripped Of Miss California Title

hazlnut said:

Speaking as a heterosexual male... Um...Yes.

If you took hot photos in your past we (hetero males) will find them... and it has nothing to do with your political views--bigoted or otherwise.:thumbs:

Click to expand...

They weren't even all that racey. There was a side boob.

Lerxst said:

With regards to the latest. Girl is fine as hell, love the photos...but if she ain't showin' up for work, hit the bricks.

Click to expand...

I know, right?! This has been a win-win for us open-minded heterosexual males.

jallman said:

They weren't even all that racey. There was a side boob.

Click to expand...

Works for me.:cheers:

jallman said:

You are either intentionally lying or your perception is way off.

Click to expand...

What do you think is a lie?

I'm not discounting that part of the criticism lobbed against her went overboard, but you cannot deny that much of it was brought on by herself and her pompous pandering.

disneydude said:

What do you think is a lie?

I'm not discounting that part of the criticism lobbed against her went overboard, but you cannot deny that much of it was brought on by herself and her pompous pandering.

Click to expand...

First of all, she didn't go running to the media. The media went running to her after grungy made his attack on her and HE suggested that she lost because of her answer. She wasn't pompous in the least; that's your negative connotation you put on her because, like fatass hilton, you can't stand that she gave an honest, respectful answer that you disagree with.

It's really sad and sickening the way homos go out of their way to shred people who disagree with them. It is the biggest contribution to why you aren't treated like you want to be treated.

jallman said:

First of all, she didn't go running to the media. The media went running to her after grungy made his attack on her and HE suggested that she lost because of her answer. She wasn't pompous in the least; that's your negative connotation you put on her because, like fatass hilton, you can't stand that she gave an honest, respectful answer that you disagree with.

It's really sad and sickening the way homos go out of their way to shred people who disagree with them. It is the biggest contribution to why you aren't treated like you want to be treated.

Click to expand...

Jall....I think it is you who has a short memory. She was on the morning programs the next day claiming that she was a martyr.

...and her answer...while it may have been honest was quite pathetic in its presentation.

disneydude said:

Jall....I think it is you who has a short memory. She was on the morning programs the next day claiming that she was a martyr.

...and her answer...while it may have been honest was quite pathetic in its presentation.

Click to expand...

Sure, if you want to disregard reality.

And she was honest and respectful. There was nothing pathetic about it unless you're some kind of hyperactivist drama queen more concerned with creating unnecessary gossip rather than looking at the kindness in others.

jallman said:

Sure, if you want to disregard reality.

And she was honest and respectful. There was nothing pathetic about it unless you're some kind of hyperactivist drama queen more concerned with creating unnecessary gossip rather than looking at the kindness in others.

Click to expand...

Jallman...get serious it was pathetic on several levels:

"I'm glad to live in a country where we can choose".....uh....wrong


"....between same marriage and opposite marriage...."


She was certainly not the epitome of public speaking....which is really what that portion of the pageant was about. Regardless of the content...on a scale of 1-10 on presentation she deserved probably around a 3.

You're absolutely ridiculous. Why don't you go ahead and get on a blog and call her a dumb bitch like your buddy grungy hilton?

You know, let's just stop this before my opinion of you falls lower than whale **** on the ocean floor.

jallman said:

You're absolutely ridiculous. Why don't you go ahead and get on a blog and call her a dumb bitch like your buddy grungy hilton?

You know, let's just stop this before my opinion of you falls lower than whale **** on the ocean floor.

Click to expand...

Pointing out how pathetic her answer was is not the same as calling her a "dumb bitch"....although I suspect that she as a martyr would try to claim that it is.

hazlnut said:

Speaking as a heterosexual male... Um...Yes.

If you took hot photos in your past we (hetero males) will find them... and it has nothing to do with your political views--bigoted or otherwise.:thumbs:

Click to expand...

Damn straight. Hell, straight males look for hot photos of random girls who aren't famous. If you're a hot girl in a national competition, and there are racy photos, there's almost a 100% guarantee someone who has them will leak them.

Bottom line: Obama can believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, but God forbid if a beauty pageant contestant does. Off with her head!!!

I'd bet Perez Hilton's "husband" woke up to a happy ending this morning.

Erod said:

Bottom line: Obama can believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, but God forbid if a beauty pageant contestant does. Off with her head!!!

I'd bet Perez Hilton's "husband" woke up to a happy ending this morning.

Click to expand...

I can't think of anyone who would have the fat ass grunge faggot.

hazlnut said:

Speaking as a heterosexual male... Um...Yes.

If you took hot photos in your past we (hetero males) will find them... and it has nothing to do with your political views--bigoted or otherwise.:thumbs:

Click to expand...

Really? Then why didnt you know about them before her answer?

None of this would have happened had Paris Hilton's BFF not asked that question and she not given an honest answer.

The Paris Hilton BFF crowd arenot very open to other opinions on the subject, and she was brutally attacked for not holding the fascist line thought process of the left wing.

Did you know the head huncho of the Pagent gave Carrie Prejean 2 gigs that were wanting her? One was a Playboy shoot.

Now tell me, if posing "semi-nude" is against the rules, why would the head huncho even mention this to Carrie? Considering everyone is up in arms over her semi-nude pics already.

disneydude said:

Sorry....but people went digging not because of her views but because she got on her hypocritical soapbox and started crying martyr.

Click to expand...

Um, no, they went after her b/c she dared went against the gay agenda and gave the LG folks a poster child against their cause.

It wasn't the photos themselves that were relevant. What WAS relevant is that she was pretending to be a pure and wholesome prude...turns out she wasn't a martyr just a hypocrite.

Click to expand...

The photos were irrelevent and unknown until she answered that question.

So it is totally relevant that she was attacked specifically b/c of her political and religious views.

Spin that any way you try, but those are the facts.

Had she never answered that question the way she did, you wouldnt know about any pictures or anything else.

TheHat said:

Really? Then why didnt you know about them before her answer?

None of this would have happened had Paris Hilton's BFF not asked that question and she not given an honest answer.

The Paris Hilton BFF crowd arenot very open to other opinions on the subject, and she was brutally attacked for not holding the fascist line thought process of the left wing.

Did you know the head huncho of the Pagent gave Carrie Prejean 2 gigs that were wanting her? One was a Playboy shoot.

Now tell me, if posing "semi-nude" is against the rules, why would the head huncho even mention this to Carrie? Considering everyone is up in arms over her semi-nude pics already.

Click to expand...

How did Paris Hilton get involved in this?

And what's a huncho?

TheHat said:

Really? Then why didnt you know about them before her answer?

None of this would have happened had Paris Hilton's BFF not asked that question and she not given an honest answer.

The Paris Hilton BFF crowd arenot very open to other opinions on the subject, and she was brutally attacked for not holding the fascist line thought process of the left wing.

Did you know the head huncho of the Pagent gave Carrie Prejean 2 gigs that were wanting her? One was a Playboy shoot.

Now tell me, if posing "semi-nude" is against the rules, why would the head huncho even mention this to Carrie? Considering everyone is up in arms over her semi-nude pics already.

Click to expand...

Hint 1: Perez Hilton is not Paris Hilton

Hint 2: no liberal, or gay nor lesbian made Prejean not fulfill her contract.

jamesrage said:

Would those photos have ever come to light if she said she supported gay marriage? Its seems the gays/trannys and apologist couldn't get her removed for her views so they went digging.

Click to expand...

Well nothing would have ever come to light if one of the judges didn't go on the internet and turn this into a big deal. She would have come in second and it would never have been a story. She would still be Miss California today.

Redress said:

Hint 2: no liberal, or gay nor lesbian made Prejean not fulfill her contract.

Click to expand...

...and if she hadn't been asked that question, you wouldn't care, and she wouldn't be "fired"?

Not that I give a rip. This was the greatest thing in the world that could have happened to her.

Erod said:

...and if she hadn't been asked that question, you wouldn't care, and she wouldn't be "fired"?

Not that I give a rip. This was the greatest thing in the world that could have happened to her.

Click to expand...

I don't care now. I just think the outrage is funny.

I'm trying to care about Ms. Prejean and just can't work up any outrage at all.

Redress said:

Hint 1: Perez Hilton is not Paris Hilton.

Click to expand...

Yes, I know this. Ever heard of sarcasm?:2wave:

Hint 2: no liberal, or gay nor lesbian made Prejean not fulfill her contract.

Click to expand...

Her contract wasnt in question until Paris Hilton's BFF, PEREZ HILTON (got it this time?:2wave decided to go off on her, to which she then had to defend herself not only from him, but from the entire media.

If you want to turn this into her simply not fulfilling her duty, that is fine, but you have to at least put it into the full context of why those circumstances came about. Otherwise, your just playing political hackery games and slandering the woman and the entire issue to fit your ridiculous assertion that she just uped and didnt fulfill her contract.

I dont care either way, this entire episdoe just goes to show the length to which the left wing radicals will go to destroy a human being who doesnt toe the line of their idealogy. That is all this is in the end. The slandering of a woman who dared to answer a question, that in a country born of freedom to speak their minds, was chastized and verbally assualted b/c she said she wasnt for gay marriage and was a Christian. And that is all it will ever be b/c that is what this is all about.

Nobody can sit here and claim that had she never said no to gay marriage, any picture of her would have been brought forth. Hell, if these pictures were out there, how come it took so long to show up at that particular moment? Only a fool would think it was by chance it surfaced when it did.

Heck the pagent guy, Keith Lewis, told her about 2 gigs she was wanted for just last month, 1 of which was a Playboy photo shoot. If it is against the pagent rules that you cant take nude pictures, then what is all the fuss over her previous ones for? (You can go to TMZ to find this story by the way.) Or was the pagent guy simply trying to get her to agree to a photo shoot, to oust her? One wonders.

TheHat said:

Yes, I know this. Ever heard of sarcasm?:2wave:



Her contract wasnt in question until Paris Hilton's BFF, PEREZ HILTON (got it this time?:2wave decided to go off on her, to which she then had to defend herself not only from him, but from the entire media.

If you want to turn this into her simply not fulfilling her duty, that is fine, but you have to at least put it into the full context of why those circumstances came about. Otherwise, your just playing political hackery games and slandering the woman and the entire issue to fit your ridiculous assertion that she just uped and didnt fulfill her contract.

I dont care either way, this entire episdoe just goes to show the length to which the left wing radicals will go to destroy a human being who doesnt toe the line of their idealogy. That is all this is in the end. The slandering of a woman who dared to answer a question, that in a country born of freedom to speak their minds, was chastized and verbally assualted b/c she said she wasnt for gay marriage and was a Christian. And that is all it will ever be b/c that is what this is all about.

Nobody can sit here and claim that had she never said no to gay marriage, any picture of her would have been brought forth. Hell, if these pictures were out there, how come it took so long to show up at that particular moment? Only a fool would think it was by chance it surfaced when it did.

Heck the pagent guy, Keith Lewis, told her about 2 gigs she was wanted for just last month, 1 of which was a Playboy photo shoot. If it is against the pagent rules that you cant take nude pictures, then what is all the fuss over her previous ones for? (You can go to TMZ to find this story by the way.)

Click to expand...

The left wing did not destroy her, she did that herself. No one on the left made her not fulfill her contracts. Maybe you guys on the right don't believe in this, but us on the left believe in accepting responsibility for what we do. Stop blaming the left because she couldn't handle herself.

Redress said:

The left wing did not destroy her, she did that herself. No one on the left made her not fulfill her contracts. Maybe you guys on the right don't believe in this, but us on the left believe in accepting responsibility for what we do. Stop blaming the left because she couldn't handle herself.

Click to expand...

Oh good grief. Yeah, all those wonderful attacks on her. No, those were done by the mysterymen of yesteryear. She handled herself just fine from all the attacks. She just had to go on TV to get the facts out concerning all the sludge the left was throwing out there on her. Its nothing new, whether it is Joe the Plumber getting his private info hacked by the State of Ohio, Clarence Thomas, or Miguel Estrada, the left attacks not only policy, but on personal issues.

If you accepted responsibility on the left, you wouldnt constantly be in my backpocket, scrounging around looking for more money to give to someone else.

Thanks for the :rofl: moment. That was quite spectacular.

Anyways, I said what i needed to say here. Nothing more can be gained from continuing this discussion from my standpoint. Carry on with it as you wish.

TheHat said:

Oh good grief. Yeah, all those wonderful attacks on her. No, those were done by the mysterymen of yesteryear. She handled herself just fine from all the attacks. She just had to go on TV to get the facts out concerning all the sludge the left was throwing out there on her. Its nothing new, whether it is Joe the Plumber getting his private info hacked by the State of Ohio, Clarence Thomas, or Miguel Estrada, the left attacks not only policy, but on personal issues.

If you accepted responsibility on the left, you wouldnt constantly be in my backpocket, scrounging around looking for more money to give to someone else.

Thanks for the :rofl: moment. That was quite spectacular.

Anyways, I said what i needed to say here. Nothing more can be gained from continuing this discussion from my standpoint. Carry on with it as you wish.

Click to expand...

The attacks on her where stupid. She was entitled to her opinion, and attacking some one for expressing their opinion if foul.

None of that changes the fact that she got fired for not fulfilling her contract. Trump probably loved the controversy she generated and would have kept her on happily, if she did as she was supposed to for the organization The controversy, and her firing, are separate things.