Because they don't know what roads to build, they won't implement traffic reducing programs (such as congestion pricing), and money is regularly taken from the gas tax and taken to the general fund. Not to mention that paying for something through taxation is immoral since it requires intimidation.I have brought up my reasons for internal improvements before. If you think the government has a specific role that can't be altered by the consent of the people then I want to hear why.
Apparently, it isn't economic growth because besides public local roads and sidewalks being inpractical it also increases efficency compared to a private system.
Charity does that also and by having the government in charity we donate less. In the 1930's during Hoover's presidency the Red Cross actually campaigned against getting the government into social programs.Just because you claim that the government shouldn't give vouchers, I don't see why you think that way because it gives the poor A CHANCE to have a suscesful life, and it increased economic growth by making the BARE MININUM investment to our population.
Because there doesn't need to be any. Companies hide information, that's ther perrogative. However, if they commit fraud by presenting themselves as something that they're not then you should have every right to sue. That should be the extent of transparency.And for transparency, why are you against the government allowing us to see how our economy is really working? Is this for principles, do you have a real reason. Once again, this simply increases economic growth and doesn't have any problems, so I am wondering why you don't support this.
Do you want your friends and neighbors to know your income and what you spend your money on?
I'm actually very leftist if you knew a real scale of politics. The reason is that government is inefficient and they get their funding through intimidation. Two bad things.You are still WAY to the right of Republicans, but there is no real reason why these basic programs are needed, and untill you explain why the government simply CAN'T help out, these programs aren't negotiable in any government that can afford them.
Even though you say you are not an anarchist, I get the feeling you are against government intervention simply for the sake of being against it. I would like to hear the real reasons for your views.