Then comes the realization that she's neither Benjamin Cardozo in a skirt nor Roger B Taney with some salsa on the side, just another judge in love with her own brilliance, and that there are better things to worry about.
Last edited by celticlord; 06-02-09 at 10:34 PM.
The reality here is...the right-wing continues to shoot themselves in the foot with their feigned outrage. Americans continue to see through their rhetoric.
They thought that if they said it enough, they could convince people that Sotomayor was a "racist"...instead America sees it as just political theater and bad acting at that.
Women (Nasty or otherwise) are going to be the reason that Donald Trump is NEVER President!
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
Rasmussen Reports: The Most Comprehensive Public Opinion Data Anywhere
ONLY 45%, not 54%!!!!
Given that no more than 35% of the country has the slightest idea of who she is and no more than 10% of the country has any familiarity with her positions and the qualities that make a good judge, I don't think it's particularly important to get public opinion on this crap.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Somebody better tell the guy in accounting writing all the big checks to professional pollsters.
This poll just says that people aren't buying the extreme talking points.
Honestly, on the morning she was nominated, I turned on Fox and Friends and two conservative legal experts were calling her a centrist. That's not the answer Darcy wanted but that was my first impression of the nominee and I haven't come across any legitimate info to contradict that.
I'd like to commission a study on the narcotic effects of talking points. For some, they do see like an opiate.