Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Schumer: Sotomayor `virtually filisbuster-proof'

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Should Chuckey Cheeze be her champion

    Quote Originally Posted by F107HyperSabr View Post
    Should Chuckey Cheeze be her champion ? I would think that the administration would have found a Senator with less glue to still a bad rap on to be her champion guide whatever it's called this process to get to sing with the SUPREMES!!! Chuckey Cheeze is lightning rod!
    To quote a line from Billy Madison:

    what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    And yes, that was in good fun

  2. #22
    User Swede's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    06-01-09 @ 08:15 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5

    Re: Schumer: Sotomayor `virtually filisbuster-proof'

    The impotence of the GOP will be on full display in the Sotomayor hearings. The few remaining GOP Senators outside the deep south, many of whom will retire rather than face the rath of the voters in 2010, will swipe helplessly at the nominee. They will humiliate themselves far more than they will damage Sotomayor.

  3. #23
    User Swede's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    06-01-09 @ 08:15 PM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5

    Re: Schumer: Sotomayor `virtually filisbuster-proof'

    Quote Originally Posted by celticlord View Post
    Sotomayor is "filibuster-proof" for the simple reason that she is every bit the stealth nominee Souter was.
    Of course, Souter was EXACTLY the kind of justice the GOP always claims it wants -- he believed in precedent, he deferred to the legislative branch, and he respected the sovereignty of the states.

    The GOP's hatred of Souter is the final proof of its towering hypocrisy on the topic of judicial nominees.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •