Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 55

Thread: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

  1. #11
    Guru
    F107HyperSabr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Last Seen
    10-21-10 @ 09:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,617

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by vendur View Post
    Are you calling her a liar, then? Her own words reveal her to be a racist, and Ricci versus DeStefano doubly confirms it.




    Are you calling her a liar, then? She has written it herself and doubly confirmed it in U.S. versus Sanchez-Villar.



    Are you calling her a liar, then? Her own words reveal her to believe she creates policy and Ricci versus DeStefano and U.S. versus Sanchez-Villar doubly confirms it.

    As an aside, I suggest you see a shrink about your odd anal fixation. And maybe a proctologist, too, for the foot I just shoved up your ass.
    any refernce to anything anal was strictly reflective of the Drug Addicts words and your posts !
    I do not recall the Viet Cong asking me if I was a natural born or Naturalized American before they shot at me, they just shot at all of us f107HyperSabr

  2. #12
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:50 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,290
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by vendur View Post
    Are you calling her a liar, then? Her own words reveal her to be a racist, and Ricci versus DeStefano doubly confirms it.




    Are you calling her a liar, then? She has written it herself and doubly confirmed it in U.S. versus Sanchez-Villar.



    Are you calling her a liar, then? Her own words reveal her to believe she creates policy and Ricci versus DeStefano and U.S. versus Sanchez-Villar doubly confirms it.

    As an aside, I suggest you see a shrink about your odd anal fixation. And maybe a proctologist, too, for the foot I just shoved up your ass.
    You have not actually read either decision have you? Ricci vs DeStafano is actually an easy read, since it is one paragraph, upholding a lower court decision. How exactly not overturning a ruling is "making policy", I will let you explain. By the way, you are wrong on all counts here.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    01-05-10 @ 06:26 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,629

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by F107HyperSabr View Post
    -racism
    -policy creation
    - bill of rights applies to indviduals

    Oh really I suggest you go and read her oppions on the 2nd Adm. also as someone else has pointed out her ruling on the Firerfighter test prove that she is a Racist if it was a White person then all hell would have broken out by now Uncle Jessy would be screaming for Whiteys Head on a silver plate

    Her stance on 2nd Adm should have made her not even on the list you can't tinker with the Bill of rights end of discussion unless your all for an Armed Uprising.

  4. #14
    Guru
    F107HyperSabr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Last Seen
    10-21-10 @ 09:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,617

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by Singularity View Post
    I read an article on Fox News about how Republicans are approaching the Sotomayer confirmation. Seems to be a bit of division here, so it will be interesting to see what happens.

    Republicans Divided Over How to Oppose Sotomayor - Political News - FOXNews.com

    "The GOP doesn't want to give Sotomayer a free ride, because they believe she is a judicial activist who will legislate from the bench.

    But they're also concerned that if they launch a no-holds barred attack on Sotomayor, the first Hispanic to be nominated to the court, they risk alienating a growing minority they want on their side in the voting booth."
    The great hypocricy of the extreme GOPPERS is that those you wish to overturn R vs W are ACTIVISTS !!!! and also those who wish to reduce the application of affirmative action.

    It is this simple if you agree with the way a Judge rules you call him fair and balanced if you don't agree you call him an activist.
    I do not recall the Viet Cong asking me if I was a natural born or Naturalized American before they shot at me, they just shot at all of us f107HyperSabr

  5. #15
    Professor
    vendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    06-05-13 @ 08:35 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,250

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    You have not actually read either decision have you? Ricci vs DeStafano is actually an easy read, since it is one paragraph, upholding a lower court decision. How exactly not overturning a ruling is "making policy", I will let you explain. By the way, you are wrong on all counts here.
    She is clearly making policy. You have no legal right to violate someone's rights merely because you are affraid if you do not violate their rights that you may get taken to court by someone other party.

    In a worst case scenario, both options will lead to litigation. There is no pragamatic nor constitutional leg to stand on.

  6. #16
    Guru
    F107HyperSabr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Last Seen
    10-21-10 @ 09:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,617

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpion89 View Post
    Oh really I suggest you go and read her oppions on the 2nd Adm. also as someone else has pointed out her ruling on the Firerfighter test prove that she is a Racist if it was a White person then all hell would have broken out by now Uncle Jessy would be screaming for Whiteys Head on a silver plate

    Her stance on 2nd Adm should have made her not even on the list you can't tinker with the Bill of rights end of discussion unless your all for an Armed Uprising.
    I am very aware of the firefighters case in New Haven Conn since I will in Connecticut. I also do not agree with her. She is wrong in my opinion about that case yet she was not the only one who went that way in that case. I also do not believe that she ruled the way, she did, even if some of us feel she ruled the "wrong way " , as a racist.

    Was the court racist in it's ruling in "Brown v. Board of Education" since it ruled in favor of BLACKS over Whites ?


    I think that her tilt in the Firefighters vs NEW HAVEN was a hyperactive application of afirmative action.

    As years go by there will cases where any one of us will not agree with any one judge does that make them automatically bad or incompetent or racist ? The reasonable person like myself would not beleive so but not all of us are reasonable!!
    I do not recall the Viet Cong asking me if I was a natural born or Naturalized American before they shot at me, they just shot at all of us f107HyperSabr

  7. #17
    Guru
    F107HyperSabr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Last Seen
    10-21-10 @ 09:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,617

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by vendur View Post
    She is clearly making policy. You have no legal right to violate someone's rights merely because you are affraid if you do not violate their rights that you may get taken to court by someone other party.

    In a worst case scenario, both options will lead to litigation. There is no pragamatic nor constitutional leg to stand on.
    just because you or I or Yashu Zasrowski does not agree with a ruling does not make that ruling setting policy or it does not make it "unconstitutional".

    She may indeed have ruled in a way that you and/or I do not agree with but that does not not her rulings unconstitutional. You see judges make many rulings over a long career and some of tjose ruling some people will disagree with.

    What I am saying it's ok to oppse her nimination but do it with honest reasons and not some knee jerk "she's a racist" blurtation.
    Last edited by F107HyperSabr; 05-30-09 at 08:30 PM.
    I do not recall the Viet Cong asking me if I was a natural born or Naturalized American before they shot at me, they just shot at all of us f107HyperSabr

  8. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    01-05-10 @ 06:26 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,629

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by F107HyperSabr View Post
    just becasue you or I or Yashu Zasrowski does not agree with a ruling does not make that ruling setting policy or it does not make it "unconstitutional".

    She may indeed have ruled in a way that you and/or I do not agree with but that does not not her rulings unconstitutional. You see judges make many rulings over a long career and some of tjose ruling some people will disagree with.

    What I am saying it's ok to oppse her nimination but do it with honest reasons and not some knee jerk "she's a racist" blurtation.
    There are other racist comments that she has made over the years any of these sort of comment were made by any White person would be attack and that person would have been run out of DC faster then Mr. Clinton eating a Big Mac

  9. #19
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Arguments on either side would carry a lot more weight if they were expressed in well-written English.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  10. #20
    Guru
    F107HyperSabr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Last Seen
    10-21-10 @ 09:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2,617

    Re: Steeley Mike=' No 'slammin and rammin' Sotomayor

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpion89 View Post
    There are other racist comments that sh ehas made over the years any of these sort of comment were made by any White person would be attack and that person would have been run out of DC faster then Mr. Clinton eating a Big Mac
    She did use poor wording in that 2001 speech but how does one instance of a poor choice of words make her a racist ?
    I do not recall the Viet Cong asking me if I was a natural born or Naturalized American before they shot at me, they just shot at all of us f107HyperSabr

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •