What also caught my eye, and what I think is really relevant here is:
You come out with thin talking points, and weak attack positions like Palin did in Oct. - Nov., you end up with egg on your face.Lehane said the GOP attacks were “probably continuing the long-term self-destruction of the Republican Party.” However, he said allowing talk show hosts, blogs and cable shows to continue to fulminate about Sotomayor’s Berkeley comments was risky.
Sure the Dems have done the same in the past, but rise above it and be the better party. Or just get all dirty in the mud while President Obama easily marks one in the W column.
Newt used to be so smart, savvy, shrewd... What happened?
Stick around vendur. You just stick around and keep these PC lib-sick racists honest. Can I get you anything, coffee, Tea, more liberal ass to shred?
How about this then she was part of the Majority on this highley racist issue
Perhaps Sotomayor's most controversial decision was in Ricci v. DeStefano, in which she was part of a panel ruling against a group of white firefighters in New Haven, Conn. — they objected after the city threw out the results of a promotion test because too many white firefighters, and not enough minority firefighters, scored high.
But for me to hell with her racist idea's, her views on the 2nd Adm. is why Mr. Obama need to tell her to remove her name plain and simple if not then he will face a firestorm from the NRA and Gun Owners that made his little commet last year seem like Sunday Backpage news.
It's all irrelevant, the Democrats will vote her in. She could label the supreme court rule by white racists and still get confirmed.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)