WI Crippler
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 15,427
- Reaction score
- 9,577
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
So are these photos showing people who have not been convicted for what happened at Abu Ghraib? Or are these photos of activities already punished?
Either way, the release of these photos would accomplish what exactly? If its people involved that have gone unpunished, then its evidence for the courtroom where they should be tried. If its for crimes already punished, then why release grotesque photos of this nature? Someone mentioned it would mean Obama wasn't looking the other way, if he released the photos. No, Obama would be looking the other way, if he didn't seek to prosecute all those responsible for what happened Abu Ghraib(if there is anybody left to prosecute at this point). Not releasing the photos, saves us from having it used as even more propoganda for recruitment against US forces in the region. Some of the good work and goodwill that US forces are trying to buildup in these areas, could be negatively impacted by the visual images of the criminal few that were involved.
Either way, the release of these photos would accomplish what exactly? If its people involved that have gone unpunished, then its evidence for the courtroom where they should be tried. If its for crimes already punished, then why release grotesque photos of this nature? Someone mentioned it would mean Obama wasn't looking the other way, if he released the photos. No, Obama would be looking the other way, if he didn't seek to prosecute all those responsible for what happened Abu Ghraib(if there is anybody left to prosecute at this point). Not releasing the photos, saves us from having it used as even more propoganda for recruitment against US forces in the region. Some of the good work and goodwill that US forces are trying to buildup in these areas, could be negatively impacted by the visual images of the criminal few that were involved.