Using what legal mechanism or under what precedent would you have the court do that? Why don't you read the decision or read a summary of the decision before making a comment like that.If it's truly an issue of class, fine, void the existing gay-marriages. Problem solved.
The vote to note void the marriages was 7-0. They couldn't legally do it. The U.S. Court won't do it.
Prop 8 is turning into a "be careful what you wish for" situation. They got their amendment. Now two of the top lawyers in the country are taking the 'new' Ca constitution to Washington.
Do you see yourself as homophobic, or just living in a logical-pragmatic vacuum? You put out this I don't hate them vibe, but reading between the lines, there's something going on.