• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load ‘Unsustainable’

celticlord

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
6,344
Reaction score
3,794
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load ?Unsustainable? (Update1) - Bloomberg.com

“We can’t keep on just borrowing from China,” Obama said at a town-hall meeting in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, outside Albuquerque. “We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children’s future with more and more debt.”

Talk about cluelessness. If Dear Leader weren't spending so damn much, he wouldn't have to borrow so damn much.

Instead of all those Constitutional law courses he slept through at Harvard, he should have taken a basic class on how to balance a checkbook. Then he'd at least have some clue as to what the problem is.

If Dear Leader wants to solve the problem of deficit spending, here's a simple suggestion:

STOP SPENDING!
 
LOL

"Hey folks I just created a deficit equal to the amount generated from 2000-2007 combined in 100 days!
Borrowing from China will burden our kids"

Like I said in another thread you hear that "burden of children" crap from Obama/Democrats/ or the left in general again..either laugh or punch them in the face.
They have completely lost any credibility on using that line for at least 10 years
 
Well, once the economy is stable due to Obama's completely foolproof bailout plan I'm sure the auto companies will just return the favor by bailing out the government. :roll:
 
Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load ?Unsustainable? (Update1) - Bloomberg.com



Talk about cluelessness. If Dear Leader weren't spending so damn much, he wouldn't have to borrow so damn much.

Instead of all those Constitutional law courses he slept through at Harvard, he should have taken a basic class on how to balance a checkbook. Then he'd at least have some clue as to what the problem is.

If Dear Leader wants to solve the problem of deficit spending, here's a simple suggestion:

STOP SPENDING!

Funny, you weren't telling the Republicans to
STOP SPENDING!
when they created this mess. Do you expect the financial crisis will just go away if we leave it alone? Eight years of Republican incompetence was enough, I don't think we'll listen to your advice any more, thank you.
 
Funny, you weren't telling the Republicans to
STOP SPENDING!
when they created this mess. Do you expect the financial crisis will just go away if we leave it alone? Eight years of Republican incompetence was enough, I don't think we'll listen to your advice any more, thank you.

You do understand the difference between millions, billions, and trillions right?

Your commentary makes no sense.

By definition the ones spending like crazy checked their conservative values at the door .
 
Last edited:
You do understand the difference between millions, billions, and trillions right?

Your commentary makes no sense.

By definition the ones spending like crazy checked their conservative values at the door .

Irresponsible spending is irresponsible no matter the amount or person.

Bush did it getting us into Iraq and now Obama did it with the bailouts. Both are wrong.

However, in 2004 Republicans CHOSE irresponsible spending.

And I love the ole bile from the conservatives side that conservatism is good, liberals are bad routine. Get it through your thick skulls, no successful country ever happened with ALL liberal or ALL conservative values.
 
Last edited:
Irresponsible spending is irresponsible no matter the amount or person.

Bush did it getting us into Iraq and now Obama did it with the bailouts. Both are wrong.

However, in 2004 Republicans CHOSE irresponsible spending.

And I love the ole bile from the conservatives side that conservatism is good, liberals are bad routine. Get it through your thick skulls, no successful country ever happened with ALL liberal or ALL conservative values.

Slow down Nelly. I am not defending them. The potential danger between a criminal with a pistol cannot be placed on the same level with a psycho that owns a working nuclear weapon. The spending gun was fired and it was wrong. The nuclear stimulus bill was fired and is being fired again and again. Whats worse really doesnt matter if we are all screwed. But we are all screwed much faster.

Obama=Bush=Cheney=Gore= Clinton

All puppets of the Federal Reserve owners.
 
Last edited:
You do understand the difference between millions, billions, and trillions right?

Your commentary makes no sense.

By definition the ones spending like crazy checked their conservative values at the door .

I understand that the Republicans so damaged the economy that, by inauguration day, 4 trillion dollars had disappeared with more flowing out every day. As a Republican, I don't expect you to understand fiscal matters but don't worry, we'll fix the mess you made.
 
Yeah. Doesn't matter that the Obama deficit for '09 by itself is as big or bigger than ALL THE BUSH DEFICITS COMBINED. You still can't criticize Obama for it. It's still all the Republicans' fault.

Such is the "reality" suggested by everyone's favorite centrist.
 
Last edited:
I understand that the Republicans so damaged the economy that, by inauguration day, 4 trillion dollars had disappeared with more flowing out every day. As a Republican, I don't expect you to understand fiscal matters but don't worry, we'll fix the mess you made.

Conservative does not equal republican. And Republican surely does not equal conservative.
Obama spent that much over memorial day weekend.

350px-2010_Budget_-_Deficit_and_Debt_Increases.png
 
Last edited:
Talk about cluelessness. If Dear Leader weren't spending so damn much, he wouldn't have to borrow so damn much.

Do you think it's reasonable to assume that the economy will contract at -6.5% every quarter for the next several decades? If not, then your argument makes no sense. It's like bitching about the amount of water your town is wasting, because the fire department had to respond to a major fire today.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. Doesn't matter that the Obama deficit for '09 by itself is as big or bigger than ALL THE BUSH DEFICITS COMBINED. You still can't criticize Obama for it. It's still all the Republicans' fault.

Such is the "reality" suggested by everyone's favorite centrist.

I cannot agree with Bushs spending in many cases but Obama spending is off the left wing and in freefall.
 
Do you think it's reasonable to assume that the economy will contract at -6.5% every quarter for the next several decades? If not, then your argument makes no sense. It's like bitching about the amount of water your town is wasting, because the fire department had to respond to a major fire today.

Paying the banks to expand is not the answer. paying the people to spend is.
 
Paying the banks to expand is not the answer.

Actually we are paying the banks to not collapse, default on their loans, and take other banks down with them. "Expanding" is the last thing on almost any bank's mind right now.

akyron said:
paying the people to spend is.

How so? I'm not opposed to a temporary sales tax holiday, if that's what you mean.
 
Last edited:
Do you think it's reasonable to assume that the economy will contract at -6.5% every quarter for the next several decades? If not, then your argument makes no sense. It's like bitching about the amount of water your town is wasting, because the fire department had to respond to a major fire today.
Your analogy is flawed.

I'm bitching about the Anti-Republicans watering their garden while the fire department is responding to said major fire.
 
Slow down Nelly. I am not defending them. The potential danger between a criminal with a pistol cannot be placed on the same level with a psycho that owns a working nuclear weapon. The spending gun was fired and it was wrong. The nuclear stimulus bill was fired and is being fired again and again. Whats worse really doesnt matter if we are all screwed. But we are all screwed much faster.

Obama=Bush=Cheney=Gore= Clinton

All puppets of the Federal Reserve owners.

It's all about opening doors though. If Bush opened the door further, than Obama is going to open it further, etc.

It's a trend that should not have been started and Bush bailing out started a lot of the ****.

That doesn't excuse Obama, but again a door opened means a door can be opened further.

I don't care who started it, I care who will do the right thing and close the door. Just because Bush spent less doesn't make his failure better because Obama spent more and it doesn't make the failure of the presidents before them that did the same thing any better.

It doesn't matter who started it, only matters who will end such idiotic spending. So far Democrats have proven themselves inadequate, and Republicans have proven themselves to be inadequate.

So what now? Elect a Republican again who will be just as irresponsible as the last? Or a Dem the same?
 
Do you think it's reasonable to assume that the economy will contract at -6.5% every quarter for the next several decades? If not, then your argument makes no sense. It's like bitching about the amount of water your town is wasting, because the fire department had to respond to a major fire today.

More like bitching that the reservoir bottom is visible, and what the hell are those jokers doing pulling out the drain plug because they claim they need the water to fund socialized medicine.
 
It's all about opening doors though. If Bush opened the door further, than Obama is going to open it further, etc.

Uh-uh.

If Bush opened the door, Obama is ripping the wall out to put in a roll-up door for the trucks.
 
I am puzzled about all this. President Obama says something the right disagrees with, and he is attacked for it. President Obama says something the right agree with, and he is attacked for it. Why would we even bother listening to those on the right these days? Get back to us when you have something constructive to say.
 
Uh-uh.

If Bush opened the door, Obama is ripping the wall out to put in a roll-up door for the trucks.

You can make all the comments you like, but you excusing Bush is excusing Obama for the same thing.

Either it is irrespnsible or it isn't.

I've admitted Obama being irresponsible, you are excusing Bush.
 
I heard Obama was elected..
I wonder when he and his supporters are going to admit it.
 
I am puzzled about all this. President Obama says something the right disagrees with, and he is attacked for it. President Obama says something the right agree with, and he is attacked for it. Why would we even bother listening to those on the right these days? Get back to us when you have something constructive to say.

Obama took a bad situation, made it 10 times worse, and now he's talking about what a horrible situation we're in, and we need to stop doing the things HE did to help get us where we are? The man is in some serious denial
 
I care who will do the right thing and close the door

Agree. The monopoly of the federal reserve has to be contained before any of this will go away.
 
I heard Obama was elected..
I wonder when he and his supporters are going to admit it.

Well **** it wasn't until Bush was out of office that conservatives stopped blaming Clinton....oh wait.....nm, that hasn't happened yet.
 
Back
Top Bottom