Yes, the information that consists of what? "We should torture?"...and inconsistent with information coming form other sources.
Really? Do they actually disprove his assertion that we should not be torturing people? That it's illegal?There is plenty of opinions opposite his opinion and there is already evidence in released documents that contradicts him.
Link them, it's your argument.Examples have been posted on this forum for the past week or so.
Or they are simply wrong. And not EVERYONE else who worked along side him is contradicting him. Why do you make statement like this? You know, dishonest ones? You deliberately distort the reality of the situation.It comes down to this-
A Bush Administration person suddenly becomes the font of truth when he says what you want to hear. Yet everyone else who worked alongside him who does not say what you want to hear is still a liar.
So produce this information that undermines his position that we shouldn't torture and that torture is illegal.That does not undermine the mans opinions(that is done by what information is known)...it does though undermine your use of the mans opinion.
Last edited by Lerxst; 05-13-09 at 06:56 PM.