• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Photo of flyover in NYC released

Yeah... I only want Rush to have what he is sure to enjoy.. lol!!! besides... his arse looks big enough to hold a 747,

Your just mad because he can abuse drugs and get away with it where as you can't even smoke a joint without facing jail.
 
The partisan bickering and bull**** in this thread is absurd. It's a picture...
 
The partisan bickering and bull**** in this thread is absurd. It's a picture...

It's pork spending for the misuse of a high value military asset effectively reenacting 9/11 in the minds of the people who were the targets of the attack.

It's not 'just a picture', not at all.
 
It's pork spending for the misuse of a high value military asset effectively reenacting 9/11 in the minds of the people who were the targets of the attack.
...and this is why it's bull****. Flying plane around NY =/= reenacting 9/11
 
It's pork spending for the misuse of a high value military asset effectively reenacting 9/11 in the minds of the people who were the targets of the attack.

It's not 'just a picture', not at all.

Would you consider recruiting advertisements for the US Military pork? Trust me one 30 second spot costs a whole heck of a lot more than 300k.
 
...and this is why it's bull****. Flying plane around NY =/= reenacting 9/11

We're talking about perception, not objective data.

The city of NY is filled with victims of violence, that violence being 9/11. I'm sure Capt'n could back me up when I tell you that victims of violence are sensitive to things and events which resemble the attack. From rape victims to combat related PSTD.

Obama admitted that this was a mistake and someone lost their job to boot. Clearly this was not simply about "just a picture".
 
Answering a question with a question is really bad form.

True, but directly answering your off-topic question is even worse.

You're trying to change the topic and I'm not cooperating. This thread is about this event and not spending in general.

I've been in to many 2nd amendment threads where people try to cloud the specific issue at hand with their general objection to firearms to fall for your games.
 
True, but directly answering your off-topic question is even worse.

You called the attempt to promote pride in America pork. I wanted to know why you consider it pork? Granted it did not quite work out in this situation but that does not mean it is pork. And I'm certain no one got rich off this failed attempt unlike like recruiting spending that advertising agencies actively pursue because of the money spent on those ads and the profitability.
 
Wait, did I read that correctly? Did that whole publicity stunt really cost $300,000? Man, the Obama administration is gonna be soooooo pissed off when they hear about Photoshop.
 
Wait, did I read that correctly? Did that whole publicity stunt really cost $300,000? Man, the Obama administration is gonna be soooooo pissed off when they hear about Photoshop.

Wait till after they buy Photoshop and find out they could of gotten GIMP for free. :2razz:
 
Wait till after they buy Photoshop and find out they could of gotten GIMP for free. :2razz:

They could spend 50k on Maya and not even have a photograph while doing photo quality 3d animation.
 
Okay why was this event pork?

As I said, $300K for a postcard pic worth 25 cents; and it's not even a good picture to boot.

Show me how this pic is going to earn more than $300K for the treasury and we can set aside any notion of pork until we see how Obama wastes it, and move on to address the impact this had on the population and how Obama placed a high value military asset in jeopardy simply for a few 100K in profit.
 
As I said, $300K for a postcard pic worth 25 cents; and it's not even a good picture to boot.

Show me how this pic is going to earn more than $300K for the treasury and we can set aside any notion of pork until we see how Obama wastes it, and move on to address the impact this had on the population and how Obama placed a high value military asset in jeopardy simply for a few 100K in profit.

Wow you are all over the map on this one. First off the WH is not in business but I bet were they were they could make. Buck off the image in question. After all Farrah Faucit made a mint off her poster. Secondly AF2 was never in jepordy. Thirdly making a 100k off of 300k means one ha
E has made 33% of their investment. That is a way bettere than average return on investment.
 
Never heard of it but it sounds cool as hell.

I just DL'd GIMP yesterday. Do you have any tips on how to learn to modify pictures and such?

The best advice I can give is to look at art history and finds what interests you. We can go from their.
 
Wow you are all over the map on this one. First off the WH is not in business but I bet were they were they could make. Buck off the image in question. After all Farrah Faucit made a mint off her poster. Secondly AF2 was never in jepordy. Thirdly making a 100k off of 300k means one haE has made 33% of their investment. That is a way bettere than average return on investment.

Reminder to self.........NEVER invest money in a business that Winston is involved in.

Seriously, that is one funny comment. I hate to break the news to you, but making 100K on a 300K investment and you've lost your arse.

And do you REALLY think more people would actually buy a photo of AF1 than Farah Fawcett's ???
 
Last edited:
Reminder to self.........NEVER invest money in a business that Winston is involved in.

Seriously, that is one funny comment. I hate to break the news to you, but making 100K on a 300K investment and you've lost your arse.

And do you REALLY think more people would actually buy a photo of AF1 than Farah Fawcett's ???

If one makes 100k on 300k and winds up with 400k on their investment that is a pretty good rate of return on investment. Capital is a wonderful ting ain't it?
 
Last edited:
If one makes 100k on 300k and winds up with 400k on their investment that is a pretty good rate of return on investment. Capital is a wonderful ting ain't it?

If the total received was 400K, you would have a point, but that's not what you said, or maybe you were simply unclear with your first post.
 
If the total received was 400K, you would have a point, but that's not what you said, or maybe you were simply unclear with your first post.

I think I was clear. I also think there are people that will turn an inch into a mile.
 
Wow you are all over the map on this one.

I try :2wave:

First off the WH is not in business but I bet were they were they could make.

That's one core problem with this country, yes. The government is on welfare. Well I say to the government GET A >>>>ING JOB!!

Buck off the image in question. After all Farrah Faucit made a mint off her poster.

And how was that NOT pork as well?

Secondly AF2 was never in jepordy.

Ah, that's why the flyover was top secret and AF2 was escorted.

Thirdly making a 100k off of 300k means one ha
E has made 33% of their investment. That is a way bettere than average return on investment.

Um, no.
 
Back
Top Bottom