Now, try to follow this, did you also READ the Joint Resolution to go to war in Iraq? A simple yes or no.
Now having read the document, do you also acknowledge that this is indeed the LEGAL justification to go into Iraq and was overwhelmingly passed in a bi-partisan fashion? yes or no; you have the link to the document?
If you said yes, how many words are there in the document?
How many words in the document have to do with WMDs?
How many words are contained in the document that attempt to assert that Al Qaeda was connected to Saddam?
These are not difficult questions; but to be honest with you, if you are not going to even give me the courtesy of an honest answer and constantly wander off target with your incessant false assertions about what constitutes a lie, then there is no reason for me to even attempt debating with you.
Now if you answer those questions HONESTLY and without your typical emotional filled hyper partisan bias, the ONLY way you can make the asinine claims that Bush lied is by making an equivalent asinine assertion that ALL the administrations and Democrats who made the identical claims are also lying to us.
If the document that was the LEGAL justification for going into Iraq contains only 200 words from a total of 1,857 words on WMDs, then WMDs cannot have been the singular reason for going into Iraq.
Now if all the FACTS cannot sway you, and the simple fact that Saddam did indeed pose a threat to the world and his neighbors sitting on one of the largest OIL reserves on earth, then no amount of credible intelligent debate will change the obvious denial you tend to wallow in.
So do me the courtesy of answering my questions and acknowledging the LINKS I provided and quotes made by Liberal Democrats; or run along with your rants about "perceived" cherry picking intelligence and CYA novels intended for gullible consumption.
The notion that the Agency Director was deliberately feeding everyone BS or that Colin Powell, one of those insiders, was deliberately lying to the UN for purposes even you cannot begin to elucidate requires the willful suspension of disbelief.
BUT, I will also leave you with this thought; what do you think Bush hoped to gain by purposely misleading the American people and supposedly "lying" about WMDs knowing of course that once we were there the truth would be discovered? I mean, if you are going to foist a lie on the American people, at least falsify and bury some WMDs out in the desert to promote the lie right?
Oh wait, you still promote the equally asinine idea that Bush is such a HUGE moron, that he was only ingenious enough to fool EVERYONE into a War of choice and was hardly smart enough to fabricate evidence to support the lie.
You see how asinine that line of thinking is when you actually THINK it out?