I AM DEPLORABLE.
NEVER CRIMINAL HILLARY (S-NY)
It was people on the right who acted drunk, going after an entire country who did not attack us and letting the person responsible for 9/11 go free. Now, I ask you, "Why did Bush let Bin Laden go free?" Seems to me that should piss you off. Yet it doesn't. Why is that?It just might sober up some folks on the left.
Thank You Barack Obama for Restoring Honor To The Presidency.
President Obama will rank as one of our greatest presidents!
I'm sideways with you here. That divisive "liberal = bad" positioning is exactly what is sinking the right politically, as we speak.
Rush Limbaugh, speaking about the GOP's "Listening Tour," said that the conservatives shouldn't be listening (read: conceeding to the very idea that they could POSSIBLY be wrong on any particular issue) but rather they should be "teaching" (read: shoving old conservative ideals down everyone's throat whether they want them or not.)
Now, I'm as pro-gun, pro-life, pro-troops and pro-national defense, small government and pro-states rights as anybody I know. But I am NOT pro-"divide-and-conquer" when it comes to the newly, self-defined, "conservatives," (a' la Limbaugh and Hannity style) who just want to split our country apart and spew division.
Nobody wants to listen when they are convinced they are right. I see no shortage of this coming from the liberal or conservative stances. But surely the conservative camp has no moral highground to blame the liberals for not wanting to listen. They are just as bad, if not worse.
Last edited by Captain America; 05-10-09 at 12:51 PM.
It's GREAT to be me. --- "45% liberal/55% conservative"
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice doggy" until you can find a gun.
Yeah, since you run your mouth about one but not the other.So now you wish to divine what it is I care about based on the above comment?
Right, it's the fault of the 13 Saudi's that were killed in their attack on the WTC, that we killed innocent people in Iraq...But again, your willful denial of the fact that those tens of thousands died not because of the actions of our troops, but because of the actions of a tiny faction of murderers and terrorists who do not want to see Democracy succeed in Iraq.
How disingenuous that you continue to suggest that I suggested our troops are to blame. Please quote where I said our troops are to blame instead of our government or admit you just made that **** up.How disingenuous that you continue to suggest that our troops are to blame.
Is that supposed to pass as an argument against what I said?The only reason you would find my arguments specious or constitute rhetoric would be due to your rabid historical ignorance of the region and your desperate attempts to swallow the terrorist propaganda that would never even occur to a rational human being to make any sense at all.
You got it wrong as usual, sport. I hate Bush but I am only disappointed in America and by standing up for what I believe is wrong I hope to prevent America from further disappointing me.But your hate Bush hate America blather you constantly spew on this forum hardly suggests that of a rational human being.
No, you must have me confused with a neocon. I don't give 2 ****s about what Bin Laden thinks. America's "evils" around the world (that which we know about at least) is easy to find if you care about truth.The only reason you “thought” that, an obvious oxymoron in your case, is because you swallow the swill dished out by Osama Bin Laden and their illogical ignorant assertions about the evils of America and the Jews and how they have caused the poverty so common in the ME.
Are you talking about neocons/evangelical fundy xians?As I stated, rational beings tend to look to FACTS and the TRUTH rather than swallow such ignorant swill dished out by uneducated murderous thugs who want to force the entire world back into the dark ages of their fundamentalist beliefs; no one can accuse you of that for sure.
It is noted that you choose to attack me instead of my argument.So now in lieu of rational coherent arguments, you resort to the absurd. Bravo for you; your irrational defense of the indefensible has been noted. Again, it hardly excuses your anti-American diatribes.
What irony coming from someone who spews irrational hatred and terrorist like propaganda and who seldom exhibits the ability to be cognizant of any FACTS even if they swat them in the head.What irony coming from someone who spews irrational hatred and terrorist like propaganda and who seldom exhibits the ability to be cognizant of any FACTS even if they swat them in the head.
Tell me something, what historical perspective do you think you are bringing to the debate? The only history I am seeing is the inane terrorist propaganda we see from the likes of Osama.Tell me something, what historical perspective do you think you are bringing to the debate? The only history I am seeing is the inane terrorist propaganda we see from the likes of Osama.
Then why do you so fervently believe whatever he says?Trust me when I tell you this; Osama lies.
Carry on; I look forward to more of your uninformed desperate defenses using propaganda that can only be made by irrational, uniformed and poorly educated slobs who could care less about your asinine assertions about how we brought on the attacks of 9-11.Carry on; I look forward to more of your uninformed desperate defenses using propaganda that can only be made by irrational, uniformed and poorly educated slobs who could care less about your asinine assertions about how we brought on the attacks of 9-11.