• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NATO forces foil attack on Norwegian oil tanker

Incorrect. You simply threw a tantrum at my explanation as to how your proposal is dangerous and why my alternative was a long term better solution for everyone.



If you do not want people to point out how your arguments and belief systems are inherently reliant on double standards and hypocrisy, then don't make it public. It's very simple. Don't open your mouth if you know that what you will say will make you look like a fool.



Given how the rest of your posts don't make sense, I'm not going to ask for how you expect that to make sense.

Just to reiterate:

The proposal to capture, imprison and try those without the consent of their government off the coast of that country sets a dangerous precedent that can and likely will be used against us. While the Somalian government has given permission to stop pirate attacks, to my knowledge as of it this day, they have not given us or anyone else the explicit right to imprison and try. Currently the US is doing this anyways. But it does not mean the rest of the world should enforce a weak precedent. If a US citizen was captured, tried, imprisoned and possibly executed without the US's consent for a crime, how would you feel? Do you think that Blackwater security guards should be captured, imprisoned and tried in Iraq?

It's a simple question, why are you so adamant against answering it?
Damn, you just don't when to quit do you? Your testosterone took over.
 
( I won't say that again..any reply you make to me in that manner from now on will be reported.)

Care to point out in the rules which rule I have broken?

Last I checked, pointing out hypocrisy, double standards and general ignorance is not prohibited by the forum rules.

I could be wrong however, and I welcome your attempt to show which rule you are reporting me for a violation.
 
Damn, you just don't when to quit do you? Your testosterone took over.

Triad essentially failed to reply with a relevant comment and threw a tantrum after I pointed out his argument's raging hypocrisy and double standards.

IMO, if someone captured, tried, imprisoned and possibly executed an American for a crime without our consent, permission or anything, I'd be pissed off.

I suspect Triad and even you agree with that. So why it is so damn hard to apply such standards evenly for some people?

Why must we create double standards and practice hypocrisy? Why is it so hard for people to be consistent?
 
Back
Top Bottom