I knew this was coming; so tell me Ikari, how many children do you have and have raised?
None, it's irrelevant. My argument is based on property, not the number of children raised. Your children are not my concern. This is deflect and nothing more.
As much as you want to rant about what is NOT public, the fact that the Government has ownership of the rights to broadcast and licenses the airwaves you transmit on does indeed make them public.
Yes yes, and a private bar is public because we call it that. Follow the money, who pays is who owns. You call it "public", but only to substantiate your point. The government "owns" it, and sells the rights to use it to companies. It merely begs the question as to how the government initially came into possession of a piece of the electromagnetic spectrum. It's like if they outlawed the transmission of red.
Simplest way to put it is who pays is the owner.
Once more in your highly emotional anarchical state, you didn't answer my question; if the frequencies of airwaves were left unregulated, you would have nothing but a mass of confused transmissions and anarchy.
This is unsubstantiated claim, hyperbole, and intellectually dishonest argument. At no point do I push for anarchy. In fact, I said that I believe the FCC's sole responsibility should be the protection of property rights. Pirating the airwaves would still be considered an offense because someone else purchased the rights to use that frequency and power and you have no right to infringe upon their property. It's not anarchy. You are only using that deflect because you can't address the actual issue of property rights. That's your inability to properly form an argument and articulate it, not mine. I'd appreciate it if you'd refrain from such obvious intellectually dishonest claims in the future when you are unable to properly argue against the base argument.
Avoiding reality is hardly a good debate tactic don't you think?
I do think so. But you're oh so good at it.
So how many children did you say you had and have raised?
Irrelevant, the argument isn't based on how many kids one has raised, it's based in property rights.
Who is arguing that the Government should solve my problems for me? Must you always conjur up pretend arguments when you rant on such a raw emotional level?
It's not emotional argument. You in fact are arguing the government should solve your problems for you. You raised children...it's ever so difficult to always police what they want. Therefore, you want the government to come in and police what is on the airwaves so that in case you are unable to properly supervise your children, they can't be exposed to content you do not like. That is the base of what you claim through the use of the FCC to uphold "decency". It is you trying to get the government to solve your problem for you. You big government statists are all the same.
I know you think the world should revolve around you and your naive myopic perceptions of reality, raising children whom you obviously haven't done and what constitutes the public airwaves, but the REAL world simply doesn't care that you THINK it should revolve around you and your narcissistic views.
Ad-hoc. And outright lie. My arguments don't even suggest that I think the world should revolve around me. This is further deflect, insult, and intellectual dishonesty on your part to avoid the base argument. My argument in fact is that it's up to the property owners, not me, to choose what they broadcast on their frequency. You claiming that I think the world revolves around me is nothing short of lie and hyperbole used to deflect from the real issues. Your arguments fall flat and you're oft left with nothing but personal insult, hyperbole, lie, and intellectually dishonest argument. That is measured fact.
In the REAL world, PUBLIC airwaves is one thing and should be regulated, and PRIVATE airwaves can contain whatever content it desires; Cable and Satellite.
In the real world, someone paid to use that piece of the electromagnetic spectrum. Thus they are private, you can not use them; I can not use them. It is the owner's ability to use and broadcast on
It is not that hard for you to comprehend is it?
Tell me? Is property that hard for you to comprehend?
You don’t like it; we get it. But this is not about YOU; it is about ALL of us and the fact that if broadcast transmissions through the airwaves are not controlled, you would have nothing but garbled nonsense. Someone has to do it dude.
It's not about me. It's about the free practice of the rights and liberties of the individual. I'm not arguing for my sake. If anything, it makes my job harder as I would have to work harder to servo what I watched and what was allowed to be on TV in my house. It's the antithesis of a personal argument. Someone has to do it? No, that's not true. No one has to do it. Consumer pressure can regulate what is shown, the government need not trample personal property rights to do so.
Now take a breath or some meds.
Yay for more personal insult by the TD.
