I see no reason to view frequencies as being any different than land. Both are constrained and defined by the same basic principles: neither can be utilized simultaneously by different people with divergent interests, and both are finite resources.
If I purchase a specific frequency - just as I would purchase a specific piece of land - I should be able to transmit whatever I like, just as I should be able to build whatever I like on my land. Obviously, the manner in which one utilizes their frequency or land would necessarily be constrained by the rights of others but anything beyond that is an infringement. The FCC should protect property rights and nothing more. Censorship is the responsibility of parents.
Really, Tipper Gore lead the battle back in the mid 80's. I provided a link to back up my argument.Originally Posted by TheNextEra
CONSERVATIVES have lead the battle over MORALITY talk on T.V.
You provide nothing but bull****.
Now, prove the following claim that you made here:
Prove it, show us the proof that this statement of yours is factual.Originally Posted by TheNextEra
The majority of people that got uupset over the tit shot WERE conservatives.
Otherwise you're just trying to bull**** your way through another thread.
Pain can be such a beautiful thing
But if you want to lie, use spin and hyperbole, and engage in intellectual dishonest debate to get your point across go right ahead. It's not like none of us have seen that before out of you.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
Yes, A PERSON on the left was against it and probably some more, but the MAJORITY of conservatives are FOR censorhipo of the airwaves. DEAL WITH IT.
Talking to you is like talking to my 4 year old neice when she goes NUH UH.
Grow up and deal with the FACTS, the majority of conservatives NOT liberals are for censoring the airwaves of swear words and tit shots.