• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UN torture envoy: US must prosecute Bush lawyers

The US not only conceived of the UN, but finances it and hosts it. Regardless of the current leadership or disorganization, we are committed to our obligation as a UN member, and cannot choose when to ignore it.
It is an obvious truth that not only the Bush lawyers, but the Bush administration must be held to account for their actions in a court of law. History demands it.

I see that reality and facts continue to elude your uniformed hyperbolic rhetoric.

The UN is an international organization established immediately after World War II. It replaced the League of Nations. In 1945, when the UN was founded, there were 51 members; 191 nations are now members of the organization.

What was the League of Nations?

A former international organization, established by the peace treaties that ended World War I. Like its successor, the United Nations, its purpose was the promotion of international peace and security.

The original membership of the League included the victorious Allies of World War I (with the exception of the United States, whose Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles) and most of the neutral nations. Among later admissions to membership were Bulgaria (1920), Austria (1920), Hungary (1922), Germany (1926), Mexico (1931), Turkey (1932), and the USSR (1934). Through the efforts of Sir Eric Drummond, the first secretary-general of the League, a truly international secretariat was created. Geneva, Switzerland, was chosen as the League headquarters.


Consider my efforts to educate you a public service for the DP forum.
 
This is not "fact"; it is rabid hyper partisan hyperbole, conjecture and speculation. Fascinating how you continue to show a propensity for not seeing the difference between this and a fact.

No matter how often you yell this it does not change reality.

We did torture and we did torture innocent people.


Dat's a fact, Jack! :mrgreen:
 
We did torture and we did torture innocent people
Since when are terrorists "innocent people"?

Oh, that's right, they aren't. And neither is your "fact" factual.
 
No matter how often you yell this it does not change reality.

We did torture and we did torture innocent people.


Dat's a fact, Jack! :mrgreen:

Yet when asked for credible facts to support such assertions, none can be found.

The reality here is that the facts are only contained in your tortured mind based on an irrational hatred for George Bush that just doesn't wash with anyone interested in an honest coherent debate.

Please provide some credible links to support such absurd efforts to lie about what actually occurred for purely partisan political purposes.

:2wave:
 
Yes, that is absolutely what we want. No question about it. Should we torture? No. Did we torture? Yes according to both standing US and international definitions and law. Should the people who ordered it be tried for war crimes? Yes. We are America, we are better than those we are fighting but unfortunately some of you don't act like it.

This is the heaviest bag of bull **** people carry in America. During the Cold War we incited rebellion inside democracies that was leaning towards the Soviet house and temporarily supported dictators that leaned towards us. And during WWII we bombed out whole cities of civilians. And what did our enemies do? Incite rebellions, support dictators, and bomb out civilian cities?

Oh, but this about the "torture" thing, right? Our enemies beat, bludgen, and electricute prisoners. Some prisoners find themselves without heads. And religious rights? Find a Bible in a Muslim prison. For that matter, how about a western diet? But waterboarding a few of our enemy makes us like them? I am so sick of the bleeding heart mentality that seeks to pick and choose its stage of morality when it fits his mood.

The mission to protect the masses has never been one of perfect morality. It cannot be. This is not a Hollywood movie. The enemy does get shot in the back. Collateral damage is weighed and is a reality of war. The enemy prisoner gets treated uncivily. And prisoners captured during the Cold War and other wars were treated as hostile information holders. But no matter our function or methods, we have never done to prisoners as they have done to ours. Your attitude that America is and has been some pristine, stick-up-the-ass, prude on its path towards righteousness is ignorant. I can only guess that you do know better, but merely choose to hate on Bush while keeping the rest of American history seperate.

When was the last time somebody dropped two atomic bombs over two seperate civilian cities? 1945? Oh...but we are not like those we fight? War is about survival. Not manners and certainly its not based on how many gold stars one receives on his path of death and destruction.

And by the way, as far as your "international law".....are you aware that it was unlawful to do anything in Kosovo and that genocide isn't genocide until the UN say's so? And that until it say's so, the international community is not obligated to act to save a single soul? Wonder why the UN has such a hard time labeling the obvious cases as such? Because it ensures that the use of apathy and ignorance is "legal."

Some of us act as if we live in the real world. We are America because we can play the game better than our enemies (and friends) while holding on to a shred of decency and morality. But this doesn't mean that when we take a walk in the enemies gutter that we are like them. Do our military men come back haunted and murderous? Do they seek to drop atomic bombs on everybody? Do they seek to stick prisoners un pikes or on the rack? We are America not just because we have proven that we can get just as violent and even more convicted to our goals than our enemies, but that we can do so and then put it behind us as we get back on the path we pave.

Self-righteous attitudes are for the protected. Not for the protectors.
 
Last edited:
From one Marine to another, you layed it out there for all to see. Maybe, just maybe, the people that think waterboarding is such a terrible thing, will read your post and then open their eyes. Hell, if any of the candy asses went through P.I. they would think waterboarding is too easy on the rag tag bunch of idiots our forces are fighting. Good post Gunny.
 
Yes, that is absolutely what we want. No question about it. Should we torture? No.

Sure, if the captive is suspected of withholding information that could save American lives. No problems there whatsoever.

Did we torture?

No, we made them uncomfortable.

Since we didn't avulse any heads, we're far more civilized than the people we're fighting, and that's all that really matters.
 
From one Marine to another, you layed it out there for all to see. Maybe, just maybe, the people that think waterboarding is such a terrible thing, will read your post and then open their eyes. Hell, if any of the candy asses went through P.I. they would think waterboarding is too easy on the rag tag bunch of idiots our forces are fighting. Good post Gunny.

Don't hold your breath on this one; they are hardly interested in the debate about what constitutes torture as they are impugning their political enemies in the court of public opinion. :2wave:
 
This is the heaviest bag of bull **** people carry in America. During the Cold War we incited rebellion inside democracies that was leaning towards the Soviet house and temporarily supported dictators that leaned towards us. And during WWII we bombed out whole cities of civilians. And what did our enemies do? Incite rebellions, support dictators, and bomb out civilian cities?

Oh, but this about the "torture" thing, right? Our enemies beat, bludgen, and electricute prisoners. Some prisoners find themselves without heads. And religious rights? Find a Bible in a Muslim prison. For that matter, how about a western diet? But waterboarding a few of our enemy makes us like them? I am so sick of the bleeding heart mentality that seeks to pick and choose its stage of morality when it fits his mood.

The mission to protect the masses has never been one of perfect morality. It cannot be. This is not a Hollywood movie. The enemy does get shot in the back. Collateral damage is weighed and is a reality of war. The enemy prisoner gets treated uncivily. And prisoners captured during the Cold War and other wars were treated as hostile information holders. But no matter our function or methods, we have never done to prisoners as they have done to ours. Your attitude that America is and has been some pristine, stick-up-the-ass, prude on its path towards righteousness is ignorant. I can only guess that you do know better, but merely choose to hate on Bush while keeping the rest of American history seperate.

When was the last time somebody dropped two atomic bombs over two seperate civilian cities? 1945? Oh...but we are not like those we fight? War is about survival. Not manners and certainly its not based on how many gold stars one receives on his path of death and destruction.

And by the way, as far as your "international law".....are you aware that it was unlawful to do anything in Kosovo and that genocide isn't genocide until the UN say's so? And that until it say's so, the international community is not obligated to act to save a single soul? Wonder why the UN has such a hard time labeling the obvious cases as such? Because it ensures that the use of apathy and ignorance is "legal."

Some of us act as if we live in the real world. We are America because we can play the game better than our enemies (and friends) while holding on to a shred of decency and morality. But this doesn't mean that when we take a walk in the enemies gutter that we are like them. Do our military men come back haunted and murderous? Do they seek to drop atomic bombs on everybody? Do they seek to stick prisoners un pikes or on the rack? We are America not just because we have proven that we can get just as violent and even more convicted to our goals than our enemies, but that we can do so and then put it behind us as we get back on the path we pave.

Self-righteous attitudes are for the protected. Not for the protectors.
God damn and hell yeah!!!!! About time!
 
Self-righteous attitudes are for the protected. Not for the protectors.

At ease private. You sound like Jack Nicholson, in A Few Good Men, as the egotistical, maniacal Colonel Nathan R. Jessep. Talk about bull ****! :doh

I see looking at the big picture, of America's place in the world, takes a back seat for you to flexing your muscles on a prisoner. THIS is the attitude that is wrong in much of our military. Maybe when the younger generation replaces the old goats, intelligence in our military will carry the biggest stick. Wow! :sigh:
 
At ease private. You sound like Jack Nicholson, in A Few Good Men, as the egotistical, maniacal Colonel Nathan R. Jessep. Talk about bull ****! :doh

I see looking at the big picture, of America's place in the world, takes a back seat for you to flexing your muscles on a prisoner. THIS is the attitude that is wrong in much of our military. Maybe when the younger generation replaces the old goats, intelligence in our military will carry the biggest stick. Wow! :sigh:
If GW Bush was hung from a meat hook on a pole, would you be satisfied?
 
If GW Bush was hung from a meat hook on a pole, would you be satisfied?

I don't want him killed. I want him to be tried, convicted and jailed for the crimes he committed as President. Is that so much to ask? :cool:
 
I don't want him killed. I want him to be tried, convicted and jailed for the crimes he committed as President. Is that so much to ask? :cool:
Got some evidence? No one else seems to.
 
At ease private. You sound like Jack Nicholson, in A Few Good Men, as the egotistical, maniacal Colonel Nathan R. Jessep. Talk about bull ****! :doh

Nice argument. Let me think what movie would represent your sound... Oh my. You sound like Harry... all the time... I've been thinking what your sounds on DP have been reminding me? Thank you for the tip, - of course, you sound like Harry, exactly like Harry! :

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbDiujuv6rQ"]YouTube - Jeff Daniels in the Bathroom[/ame]
 
Moderator's Warning:
Everyone needs to stop the foolish posturing and personal attacks or there will be further consequences.
 
I don't want him killed. I want him to be tried, convicted and jailed for the crimes he committed as President. Is that so much to ask? :cool:


You mean crimes according to ADK_Forever and a United Nations that prefers "stability" at any cost and rebukes the international courts calling for the genocidal maniac, Al-Bashir's, for fear of unsettliung humanitarian attempts in the wake of ignoring the massacre. Because I don't see any crimes. By the way, hear about those civilians that were murdered a few days ago by the U.S. military strikes under President Obama?
 
Last edited:
Yes, some do as what happened at ft. Bragg.



As witnessed by some message boards, yes, some do.



And as above post some do.

What are your thoughts to that?

My thoughts are that you are being obtuse again. Taking the very few exceptions and holding them up as definition. I have yet to kill an American civilian, placed a person on the rack, and believe it or not...I have managed to keep myself from dropping a nuclear bomb on anybody. In fact, I can say that about everybody I know and every unit I have encountered. Therefore the understanding that our service men who are sent off to conduct the daily routine of warfare do not come back haunted, murderous, and doomed in our society. Argue for the few. I argue for the vast majority and the overwhelming rule.

Thoughts?

Wait...wait. I'll do your part for you. "You stated it as if it was 100 percent and I reminded you of Bragg, which means you were wrong." To which I retort, "My meaning was clear and if finding argument in the petty is all that is left to you, then accept some truth and move on." And I would go on to state that it is equally petty to say a person is wrong for stating that a barrel of apples is bad because there is an apple in there amongst the 60 that is good.

OK. Now...thoughts?
 
Last edited:
You mean crimes according to ADK_Forever and a United Nations that prefers "stability" at any cost and rebukes the international courts calling for the genocidal maniac, Al-Bashir's, for fear of unsettliung humanitarian attempts in the wake of ignoring the massacre. Because I don't see any crimes. By the way, hear about those civilians that were murdered a few days ago by the U.S. military strikes under President Obama?

Bravo...... :applaud

But again, we all make the mistake of thinking that ADK is a rational person who cares about the truth don't we? :2wave:
 
Bravo...... :applaud

But again, we all make the mistake of thinking that ADK is a rational person who cares about the truth don't we? :2wave:

Maybe he is a victim of our media.

1) For twelve years Saddam Hussein's comings and goings were dictated by outside sources. For twelve years he was told where he could fly his jets over his own air space and we occupied parts of Iraq for humanitarian reasons against his wishes. YET....Bush gets to be appointed as the "soveriegn killer."

2) After UN troops stood by and watched the slauhgter of hundreds of people in Bosnia, President Clinton shoved the UN aside, and used NATO to solve the problem. Then in 1999 President Clinton went against the wishes of the UN and bombed the hell out of Kosovo using parts of NATO to assist and the UN called it "illegal." YET...Bush gets to be labeled as the international criminal that defied the UN.

The truth is clear. But, Bush hating became the political tool for Democrats and the fad for the weak minded.
 
Maybe he is a victim of our media.

1) For twelve years Saddam Hussein's comings and goings were dictated by outside sources. For twelve years he was told where he could fly his jets over his own air space and we occupied parts of Iraq for humanitarian reasons against his wishes. YET....Bush gets to be appointed as the "soveriegn killer."

2) After UN troops stood by and watched the slauhgter of hundreds of people in Bosnia, President Clinton shoved the UN aside, and used NATO to solve the problem. Then in 1999 President Clinton went against the wishes of the UN and bombed the hell out of Kosovo using parts of NATO to assist and the UN called it "illegal." YET...Bush gets to be labeled as the international criminal that defied the UN.

The truth is clear. But, Bush hating became the political tool for Democrats and the fad for the weak minded.

There could be a lot of truth to that, except the links he provides to support such inane assertions appear to indicate a willingness to seek out those sources that best fit his narrow, uninformed and myopic views of what constitutes criminal behavior.

I am sure he will find a way to link Bush to Iran’s and North Koreas desire to continue the development of a nuclear weapon and show how he allowed his friends in the evil weapons industry to profit from it. :cool:
 
You mean crimes according to ADK_Forever and a United Nations that prefers "stability" at any cost and rebukes the international courts calling for the genocidal maniac, Al-Bashir's, for fear of unsettliung humanitarian attempts in the wake of ignoring the massacre. Because I don't see any crimes. By the way, hear about those civilians that were murdered a few days ago by the U.S. military strikes under President Obama?

I guess a mod's warning doesn't apply to you, ehh? :roll: Is that the kind of example of behavior we're supposed to follow?

Just curious. :2wave:
 
So, even if we assume laws were broken here . . .

A lawyer who advises a criminal may be prosecuted for it?

Do you people have any idea what kind of backwards, slack-jawed, anti-intellectual, illiberal idiocy you're spewing? Seriously?

I guess that means the right to counsel is out the window. And you people love to jabber about "shredding the Constitution."


Look...The truth here is very simple:

Bush wanted to torture prisoners so he got a few bad apple lawyers to torture logic & the English language to say it was legal. (If Bush wanted to rob banks, these same lawyers would find a way to say bank robbery was legal)

Get it?? ...It's really very simple, as the jury will eventually find.
 
Back
Top Bottom