• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style Attac

Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Why does your side of the issue always say this nonsense?

Why do people fail to see a sarcasm unless the poster explicitly places a /sarcasm/ in the post?

;)
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Fortunately, the definition has already been settled and it's not your opinion. Waterboarding was considered torture and therefore illegal before the Bush admin and after.

Really? When exactly did the US government outlaw waterboarding?
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Did anybody bring up that we waterboard many of our own soldiers as part of training them to deal with interrogation?

Buddies of mine have told me of being waterboarded in advanced training in the service. They said it was virtually impossible not to comply with whatever was being asked of them, but that it did them no lasting harm.

If we do it to our own soldiers to toughen them up and prepare them for the worst, I have no problem with doing it to known terrorists if we reasonably believe doing so may prevent an attack.

There's apparently a world of difference between waterboarding, and traditional "torture" such as splinting the fingernails, cutting off body parts, etc.

G.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

I would rather see that than the diminution of our rights and the loss of our moral standing and the safety of our citizens and military personnel abroad.

You don't live in the real world do you?

You'd rather have people killed, DEAD...

And you cannot name a single RIGHT lost during the Bush years... you actually made me sick
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

I believe in results.

8 years before 9/11 we treated Terror like a police problem, culminated in 9/11.

8 years after 9/11 we used water boarding and other methods and have not been attacked once.

Now we go back to the pre-9/11 methods? Seriously?
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

I believe in results.

8 years before 9/11 we treated Terror like a police problem, culminated in 9/11.

8 years after 9/11 we used water boarding and other methods and have not been attacked once.

Now we go back to the pre-9/11 methods? Seriously?

This is specious reasoning. There's no proof that's what did it. We didn't suffer a whole lot of terrorist attacks on the State's soil before hand; it was already a low probability event. You have to get a few sigma out before you can start making any form of claim.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

And what if no information is gained? What do you tell that person that you tortured? Sorry?

I'm not advocating the random and generalized "torture" of "suspected" terrorists. I'm advocating the exclusive "torture" of known terrorists who are thought to have information concerning an impending terrorist attack on the US. If their being "tortured" yielded nothing in the way of substantive information I wouldn't be inclined to apologize. Instead, I would most likely say, "See you in hell, terrorist scum-sucker. It's been a pleasure torturing you."
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

I'm not even one of those "we cannot torture" people...

But can you guarantee that 100% of the time that these things happen they always occur to someone that is legitimately a terrorist....let alone someone that has actually violated ANY law or someone that actually has any information?

Nothing is a 100% guarantee; but it continues to BEG the question, the alternative is to do what? Nothing?

I am always amused how people can conveniently forget our mindsets right after the 9-11 attacks. But I am stunned how they can pretend that it never occurred or will never be repeated perhaps with even more devastation.

Denial can do that to people. :cool:
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Am I the only one that sees the irony in many of those that scream fascism, tyranny, and socialism with every bailout, environmental protection, or social safety-net, are also some of the biggest defenders of government sanctioned torture, denial of habeas corpus, and warrantless wiretaps?

You don't trust the government to bail out a bank, but you trust them with torture? You don't trust the government to administer say, unemployment extensions, but you trust them with selectively denying habeas corpus?

You guys that defend this crap are the very enablers of tyranny and you don't even know it.

I find it ironic that you have to fabricate arguments to make yours; one that requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

There is a VAST difference between a Government that wants to stick it's hands into every facet of our lives and redistribute it's citizens wealth on what IT feels is best for the nation, it is a completely different one than a Government trying desperately to protect it's citizens from it's enemies.

However, I am not surprised with the desperate attempts to fabricate arguments from Liberals like you; after all, you are the same one's who pretended to care about deficit spending; when a Republican was in charge. Now it makes perfect sense to watch the Government descend into a debt bath of $1.8 trillion; got hypocrisy?

Carry on; I look forward to more irony from Liberals who say Obama wants to bring us all together while he releases sensitive memos wrenching the country into TWO distinct camps and then they attempt to put those who authorized these actions on trial in the public arena. You just can't fabricate the level of ignorance, arrogance and hypocrisy it must take to be a Democrat these days. :2wave:
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

And how many lives of our soldiers pays that bill? How many trillions of dollars is enough? How many countries destroyed till your blood lust is satisfied? The terrorists hit us, it was sad. They took out 3,000 people; but we've killed well more since then. More of us, and well more Iraqi's and other people. We've destroyed the lives of countless civilians, is that not what we authorize our own action against? They came and blew up something of ours, killed our civilians, we get to retaliate? Do you take retaliation against us as just then? We went over there, blew up a bunch of their stuff, killed their civilians as well?

That is what soldiers do Ikari, they risk their lives so that we can all be safe little ignoramuses in the Western nations who take their sacrifice for granted and wallow in denial about giving terrorists the same rights our soldiers have in a fantastical belief that if we treat terrorists better than they treat even their own kind, they will stop trying to kill us.

The only thing more fantastical than the above tripe is the notion that they died because of Bush. They died because the terrorist thugs were trying to kill as many of them as possible because cretins in the US called liberals and Democrats are known for whining for purely political purposes when some of our people get killed, will blame their own people for the deaths for purely political purposes and basically GAVE the terrorists their strategy for them. You don’t believe me; READ their own words and those of Osama then!!

Yet we walk through the valley of denial, we will let no FACTS, TRUTH or SACRIFICE deter us from our naive notions about how the world works.

Carry on. :roll:
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

No, I am just pointing out that if you say to the government "You can torture terrorists and deny them habeas corpus, but you cannot torture anyone else or deny them habeas corpus." Then you are giving the government the power to torture and deny habeas corpus to anyone the government labels as a terrorist. The only thing at that point protecting you from the government torturing you or denying you the right to challenge your accusers is that it has not chose to label you a terrorist.

Fascinating fabrication; yet there are no facts to support such a delusional opinion.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

I would rather see that than the diminution of our rights and the loss of our moral standing and the safety of our citizens and military personnel abroad.

You should be the poster child for Liberals Slippery and this should become and advertisement for why Liberals and Liberal Democrats should never obtain leadership positions in Government.

I am sure the families of the 9-11 victims and the future victims will appreciate that you don't give a rat’s ass about their rights to live in peace and safety in this country as long as we can claim we held the moral high ground by not doing enough to prevent such tragedies.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

And what if no information is gained? What do you tell that person that you tortured? Sorry?

What if information, as we have been told IS the case by those within the CIA and the former Vice President stated, does in fact save lives?

I am amused by your “what if's” because they require the willing suspension of disbelief and one who willingly wallows in disbelief.

Why is it you want so desperately to believe that what Cheney and the CIA said is false, that they are liars and the terrorists are just innocent victims they pulled off our streets?

These aren't the facts, yet it requires one to believe they are in order to have such opinions. :doh
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

This is specious reasoning. There's no proof that's what did it. We didn't suffer a whole lot of terrorist attacks on the State's soil before hand; it was already a low probability event. You have to get a few sigma out before you can start making any form of claim.

You may want to re-check your facts there dude. :roll:
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

That's about as logical as saying that if I permit the government to prosecute and imprison murderers, then I'm permitting the government to prosecute and imprison anyone they label a murderer. And that the only thing protecting me from government prosecution and imprisonment is that it has not labeled me a murderer.

:shock:

No, what protects you from wrongful imprisonment and torture right now is that torture is illegal for everyone, and you have the right to challenge your accusers in the courts. You have legal rights, and the government is not above the law.

However, by telling the government that they torture anyone they label as a terrorist suspect, you are placing the government outside of the law and all they have to do is label someone a terrorist suspect, and those protections no longer apply.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Did anybody bring up that we waterboard many of our own soldiers as part of training them to deal with interrogation?

Buddies of mine have told me of being waterboarded in advanced training in the service. They said it was virtually impossible not to comply with whatever was being asked of them, but that it did them no lasting harm.

If we do it to our own soldiers to toughen them up and prepare them for the worst, I have no problem with doing it to known terrorists if we reasonably believe doing so may prevent an attack.

There's apparently a world of difference between waterboarding, and traditional "torture" such as splinting the fingernails, cutting off body parts, etc.

G.

Actually I mentioned it briefly :)

I believe in results.

8 years before 9/11 we treated Terror like a police problem, culminated in 9/11.

8 years after 9/11 we used water boarding and other methods and have not been attacked once.

Now we go back to the pre-9/11 methods? Seriously?

HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE logic.

On September 10th, 2001 you could've said the EXACT same thing about treating it like a "police problem" as you are doing now. EXACTLY the same thing. That doesn't make the way Clinton handled it any better, but that also doesn't in and of itself prove ANYTHING concerning the way we currently are going about it. Could it be a factor? Yes. But to act and claim like that is somehow some definitive proof that the way we're doing things is the best or that waterboardng/the way we're doing interrogations now is the reason for it is completely and fully idiotic and illogical.

Correlation does not equal causation.

This is the stupidest argument that pro-Bush people use to prop up the acts he's done since 9/11. We went 8 years without an attack within our borders under Clinton as well, does that mean on September 10th, 2001 Bill Clinton's way of handling terrorism was a good thing? Does that mean in 6 months if we get hit by a terrorist attack these same people are going to say that's unequivocal proof that Bush's policies failed?

Give me a ****ing break, a ridiculous and pathetic argument.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

I find it ironic that you have to fabricate arguments to make yours; one that requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

There is a VAST difference between a Government that wants to stick it's hands into every facet of our lives and redistribute it's citizens wealth on what IT feels is best for the nation, it is a completely different one than a Government trying desperately to protect it's citizens from it's enemies.

You don't get it. Tyrannies do not come about due to government protections for endangered species or progressive taxation. If that put nations on the road to tyranny, then every developed nation on earth would be a tyrannical dictatorship by now. Instead, and this is always the case, tyrannies come about when the citizens of a nation allow their government to operate outside of the law in exchange for promises of security.

Any power placed in government will be abused at some point. It doesn't matter whether its defense contracts or welfare programs. Centralize anything, and there will be abuse. The problem here is that if you place government outside of the law, and you allow them to torture and deny habeas corpus to anyone they label as a terrorist suspect, then the consequences of its inevitable abuse is extremely dangerous for the preservation of liberty.

If you don't get that, then thank God your not running anything.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Horrible to look at what we did before 9/11, with attacks on our ships, our barracks and yes one OTHER attack on the WTC... and what we did afterwards that resulted in... no attacks.

I think your problem is that it shows the methods you seem to prefer showed a poor track record.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

That is what soldiers do Ikari, they risk their lives so that we can all be safe little ignoramuses in the Western nations who take their sacrifice for granted and wallow in denial about giving terrorists the same rights our soldiers have in a fantastical belief that if we treat terrorists better than they treat even their own kind, they will stop trying to kill us.

Is that what you believe now? So how much are tickets to Truth Detector land? A magical, mystical place of lies and spins. Tea cups can be your main ride...spin, spin, spin.

I am not being kept safe by an occupational war in Iraq, that has zero to do with me. Terrorism was never a huge threat to me, it doesn't impact my life that much. What it did was to allow for war that should never have happened. It allowed for expansion of the government beyond that which it should have done. It's got little partisan hacks running around shouting if you're not with us, you're against us and other nonsensical ignorant statements. Don't sit there and try to tell me that I'm sacrificing soldiers for my safety. My rights are not being defended in Iraq, my liberty is not at stake. The terrorists had no way of impacting those things, the government is the biggest threat in those regards. And they have used this little propaganda war to raise the shadow of horribly large, intrusive government into our lives. Those soldiers in Iraq should not be there. They should never have been called on to sacrifice themselves for this cause, for the cause has nothing to do with America's sovereignty or the "safety" of the People. I don't take that sacrifice for granted, I want to respect that resolve. I want to employ the military only when my freedom and liberty is at stake. My countrymen should sacrifice themselves for nothing less. Be given ever advantage in a fight, be reserved for only when true threats arise. Afghanistan fine, I could buy into that one at the beginning...everything else has been nothing short of cluster****. Perpetrated and proliferated by the likes who will claim my "safety".

I'm well aware of my safety, and for the most part I can take care of myself. Terrorism isn't the threat you make it out to be. It's a constant, we'll never run out of terrorists. You have to be on guard and there are things which can be done to help curtail it. It will never be zero. We will eventually be attacked again, and we'll deal with it when that time comes. But don't sit there and try to pass off what our military men and women go through as some sacrifice for me or my safety. Talk about not respecting the commitment. Nothing I have is at stake in Iraq, never was. What is at stake is ever decreasing liberty caused by ever expansive and intrusive government. All at the hands of big government types who want nothing more than power to the federal government. The worst of which claim some form of conservatism as political ideology. Liars the whole lot.

The only thing more fantastical than the above tripe is the notion that they died because of Bush. They died because the terrorist thugs were trying to kill as many of them as possible because cretins in the US called liberals and Democrats are known for whining for purely political purposes when some of our people get killed, will blame their own people for the deaths for purely political purposes and basically GAVE the terrorists their strategy for them. You don’t believe me; READ their own words and those of Osama then!!

Yet we walk through the valley of denial, we will let no FACTS, TRUTH or SACRIFICE deter us from our naive notions about how the world works.

Carry on. :roll:

Emotionalized tripe and nothing more. The only thing more fantastical than your verbal diarrhea here is the notion that Iraq had anything to do with the safety, freedom, or liberty of America. That's nothing more than propaganda, I hope myself never so dumb as to buy into it.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Horrible to look at what we did before 9/11, with attacks on our ships, our barracks and yes one OTHER attack on the WTC... and what we did afterwards that resulted in... no attacks.

I think your problem is that it shows the methods you seem to prefer showed a poor track record.

I have a rock that scares away tigers. I saw a tiger once, then I got this rock. Now there are no more tigers.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

You may want to re-check your facts there dude. :roll:

Let me see:

1920
Sept. 16, New York City: TNT bomb planted in unattended horse-drawn wagon exploded on Wall Street opposite House of Morgan, killing 35 people and injuring hundreds more. Bolshevist or anarchist terrorists believed responsible, but crime never solved.


1975
Jan. 24, New York City: bomb set off in historic Fraunces Tavern killed 4 and injured more than 50 people. Puerto Rican nationalist group (FALN) claimed responsibility, and police tied 13 other bombings to the group.


1993
Feb. 26, New York City: bomb exploded in basement garage of World Trade Center, killing 6 and injuring at least 1,040 others. In 1995, militant Islamist Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and 9 others were convicted of conspiracy charges, and in 1998, Ramzi Yousef, believed to have been the mastermind, was convicted of the bombing. Al-Qaeda involvement is suspected.

1995
April 19, Oklahoma City: car bomb exploded outside federal office building, collapsing wall and floors. 168 people were killed, including 19 children and 1 person who died in rescue effort. Over 220 buildings sustained damage. Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols later convicted in the antigovernment plot to avenge the Branch Davidian standoff in Waco, Tex., exactly 2 years earlier. (See Miscellaneous Disasters.)


2001
Sept. 11, New York City, Arlington, Va., and Shanksville, Pa.: hijackers crashed 2 commercial jets into twin towers of World Trade Center; 2 more hijacked jets were crashed into the Pentagon and a field in rural Pa. Total dead and missing numbered 2,9921: 2,749 in New York City, 184 at the Pentagon, 40 in Pa., and 19 hijackers. Islamic al-Qaeda terrorist group blamed. (See September 11, 2001: Timeline of Terrorism.)

So that's 5 terrorist attacks on US State soil since the 1920's.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Horrible to look at what we did before 9/11, with attacks on our ships, our barracks and yes one OTHER attack on the WTC... and what we did afterwards that resulted in... no attacks.

I think your problem is that it shows the methods you seem to prefer showed a poor track record.

Wait, so your comments aren't about within our border but simply attacks on American's abroad?

Since 9/11 we've had routinely attacks by terrorists upon our military and military installations and our embassy. Or do attacks on embassies, facilities, and troops only count for when it happens to Clinton.

Or are you going to bring up Kohbar towers which wasn't American land, but was reportedly partially targeting Americans. Because if you wish to bring that up I'd point to the 2005 Amman Bombings.

Sorry, by WHATEVER standard you want to push it, its not a good way of measuring things. From 1993 to September 10th, 2001 we had no attacks within our border. We did have attack on U.S. Lands (embassies), but we've had that in the past 8 years. We did have attacks on U.S. military vehicles, but we've had that in the past 8 years. We did have attacks on troop facilities, we've had that in the past 8 years. We did have attacks on non-US facilities that killed Americans, but we've had that too.

You're massively mistaken if you think I prefer the Clinton method completely. Especially when I stated that nothing that I was stating meant Clinton's policies were any better than Bush's.

But that's typical of you Mr. V. Someone dares disagree with you so naturally they must be a terrorist loving torture hating lefty fool regardless of any actual FACTS outside of disagreeing with you. If the option was "Bush's way" or "Clinton's way" and that was my only options I'd choose Bush's without a second hesitation. That said, NEITHER way is perfect or even near perfect and Bush's still needs a GREAT deal of fine tuning and has a GREAT deal of things I have issues with. I also have been on record numerous times in this forum to saying that many of the Bush administration actions HAVE gone about making us safer, however using the false, ignorant, ****ty attempt at logic by saying "we were attacked on 9/11 so clinton's policies are bad, we haven't been attacked since 9/11 so Bush's policies are good" is up there just below "God Told me so" in regards to the worst ways of attempting to prove that point.
 
Re: CIA Confirms: Waterboarding 9/11 Mastermind Led to Info that Aborted 9/11-Style A

Nothing is a 100% guarantee; but it continues to BEG the question, the alternative is to do what? Nothing?

I am always amused how people can conveniently forget our mindsets right after the 9-11 attacks. But I am stunned how they can pretend that it never occurred or will never be repeated perhaps with even more devastation.

Denial can do that to people. :cool:

And you assume I have denial about how we felt after the 9/11 attacks....why?

I have no issues with a large ramp up immediately after a devastating thing to be sure such doesn't snowball. However, it needs to be reduced back to a reasonable level in due order shortly after.

You get mugged and have a knife put to your throat during it. After that point you get extremely paranoid. You get a massive home alarm system for your house that you've got set to go off at the slightest thing, you go out and register a BIG handgun and start carrying, you don't lave the house except during the day and even then its extremely rarely. All of these are reasonable reactions to having such a horrible event take place as you're not wanting it to repeat itself, especially that soon. You do all this in hopes of recovering to live your normal life in peace and actively without fear.

However, if 8 years later you're still barely leaving your house except for essentials and you're still having to go reset your alarm constantly due to minor things tripping it and you still have this huge unwieldy gun that's probably not practical for personal self defense in the street you're being overly paranoid and foolish to the point that you've given up any sort of normal and none-frustrating life in exchange for your safety.

In my mind, the smarter thing to do would be as your paranoia and confidence increases after a few months or a year you scale your alarm system back to a reasonable level so its not falsely going off constantly, you go out and maybe get a more practical easy to carry and simpler to fire gun, and you actually start living a normal life out and about instead of being a shut in.

Same thing with this. Ramping things up massively in the short term after 9/11 was no problem to me. However, I expected those things to be stripped away a great deal as we moved farther away from it because the entire reason I thought they were there was to ensure the longevity of our freedom at the expense of some short term loss of it. And, in the end, we'd arrive at a place where we've learned some lessoned, fixed a few things (like removing the Gorelick Wall for example, or updating our surveillance law to the 20th century, or increasing our human intelligence), but return to a FREEDOM focused society.

That hasn't happened. Instead, the security focused society has not subsided and in some instances increased. The amount of freedom we gave up has NOT been given back to us this far out.

Do I want another 9/11 to happen? No. But I would rather take a 9/11 every 10 years and take the chance that it hits me than continuely go down a road where the very founding principle of America, FREEDOM, is stripped farther and farther away in the name of security.

However, as old El Rushbo says so often, I reject the premise of your argument. I reject the premise that we HAVE to go over the top and full out to ridiculous levels of security to be able to prevent another 9/11. I believe a near equal amount of protection can be had through less freedom encroaching ways, and I believe that violating the very thing that is used as the reason we need to protect ourselves is counter productive. It is like buying security to keep ones money safe, but spending all of ones money on that security.

No sir, you're absolutely mistaken. I've not forgot 9/11, nor how we felt at that time, nor do I have a problem with the things we did immediately proceeding. Its the fact that so many of the things that should've gone away over time remain and so many other things have been continued that I have an issue with long after 9/11.
 
Back
Top Bottom