So wait...you're going to get all twisted over 19 months in an executive position because its Palin, yet you won't acknowledge that your guy had 20 something weeks worth of experience as a junior senator?
You aren't tracking what I'm saying. I admitted Obama had little to no experience at all. We were discussing Palin's qualifications, not Obama's, and I wasn't getting all twisted.
Okay, Lerxst, we're just going to have to agree to disagree because I think the whole conversation just took on an air of being ridiculous. I'm not going to sit here and play your game of hunting down the details of everything Palin did as governor while you refuse to do the same for your little community organizer.
Right, so you don't want to talk about Palin, which is who the conversation was about, but you're going to stomp off because I asked you to contain the discussion the topic. You were the one defending her experience, I simply took what you provided and began examining it. But now it's about me not wanting to talk about Obama. What the ****, I wasn't the one in here defending Obama's experience and qualifications was I? Did I make that argument? No I didn't. So why are you stomping off when I don't take up that mantle? Look, as I pointed out in an earlier post, I know the guy has little to no experience, I admit that. I also admit I voted for him despite that. There you go j, that is my position. I agree with you he's a babe in the woods with no executive experience. Can we kiss and make up now?
Now, I would like to discuss Sarah Palin if we could. Since you were one of the only people in this thread who had the balls to actually step and define things about her that you felt were good qualifications, I'd appreciate a continuance of our discussion on your position.
You basically hold Palin to a different standard because she has the R after her name and nothing more. It's beyond absurd.
Oh whatever, that's horse dookey and you know it. What's absurd is you suggesting that, simply because I'm not up here slamming Obama when the conversation...the thread...was about Palin. All I did was take the defense you offered up and hammer away at it. If you don't want get any deeper into what you laid out there, fine, I understand. However my criticism stands.
Look, I hold Palin's performance during the campaign against her, because that's all I have to go on. You apparently seem to think she did a bang up job, obviously I disagree. All four of those involved made horses asses of themselves at one point or another. I just chose to vote for black horse and I'm okay with that. I think he was the better choice, but not because I think he had more executive experience, or really experience of any kind, over anyone else. I just liked what he had to say and thought his direction was better for the country than McCains. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that.
I still love you.