- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 9,349
- Reaction score
- 3,947
- Location
- Montana
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No--there is no significant difference. Homeland Security is defining who may be home grown terrorists. If you MAY be one, they are looking at you. NRL MAY be one based on the way HS is defining the parameters.
Just because they said that single issue groups may be extremist doesn't meant that they are going to be watched. Nothing in the report implies that they are going to be watching all single issue groups. That's absurd. This still sounds like nothing but paranoia.
Sure they are susceptible--do they need to be targeted as suspicious because they are just like the rest of us, but have military training?
Again, I fail to see how they are being targeted as suspicious. The article only said that they are being targeted by these groups. Once again, heavy on the paranoia.