And why does your tone suggest that you do not care about children?
When homosexual partners can procreate with one another, I'll be first to grant them the right to marriage.
Where do we draw the line when it comes to marriage?
Brother & Brother?
Sister & Sister?
Brother & Sister?
Fathers and daughters?
Mothers and sons?
Mothers and daughters?
Fathers and sons?
Adults and juveniles?
Aunts and Uncles with nieces and nephews?
Grandparents and other immediate family members?
If they "love" each other (the defense for gay marriage)... then why not let everyone marry anyone and anything?
Where do you draw a line in the sand?
And if that line in the sand is at Gay Marriage... WHY?
You're a bigot...
...so goes the argument against those who do not support gay Marriage.
Last edited by zimmer; 04-09-09 at 12:07 PM.
I AM DEPLORABLE.
NEVER CRIMINAL HILLARY (S-NY)
QUOTE=Ikari;1057986177]What does that have to do with the current conversation? Nothing? Thought so.[/QUOTE]Most people at one time opposed interracial marriage, was it right to ban it? Your argument says yes. But we're not a strict democracy, this isn't mob rule.[
I ask you the same question? I'm just illustrating that you did the same thing.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
People like this creep me out:
Not people at gay pride parades. I guess evry group has their cross to bear (pun intended).
The bigot is you my friend, who cannot make a valid argument against me because your only true concerns behind gay marriage is the fact that your homophobic.
"If religious instruction were not allowed until the child had attained the age of reason, we would be living in quite a different world" - Christopher Hitchens
> Good to be back, but I'm only visiting for a few weeks. <