Women (Nasty or otherwise) are going to be the reason that Donald Trump is NEVER President!
Because there has to be boundaries on those things, they have been decided historically, such as marriage being between two people of opposite sex over a certain age etc, and now the arbitrary power of this liberal committee on public safety is being used to randomly redefine that.To put it simply, if the government involves itself in allowing people to enter into legal contracts, why should the government involve itself it defining who should be able to enter into that contract based on race, gender, age or sexual orientation. Its actually very logical
It may be logical and good to you but that is no excuse for the use of dangerous means.
"It is written in the eternal constitution that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." - Edmund Burke
I was going to spend time reading this whole thread through, but once I started to read the typical arguments about activist judges and blah blah blah, I just skipped to the last page. It's nice to see the branches of government doing their job and delivering a fair ruling that is not done without any sneakiness or obscurity. I'm contented to just accept this and move on.
That is rewriting the law.Consequently, the language in Iowa Code section 595.2 limiting civil
marriage to a man and a woman must be stricken from the statute, and the
remaining statutory language must be interpreted and applied in a manner
allowing gay and lesbian people full access to the institution of civil