- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 8,468
- Reaction score
- 1,575
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
What you said wasn't an actual argument, it was a non-sequitur which relied on the premise that the constitution, which of course was for a federal system where the states had their own denominational arrangements, needs to mention religion to be made for a moral and religious people. The conclusions do not follow from the premise, it refutes itself.Again none of what you said refutes what I said. Try again.
Last edited: