Canadian-bloke
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 31
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Studies disagree with you. STD transmission rate is reduced by 50% in circumcised males.
Just because one practice is more effective, the effectiveness of the other practice is not negated. Try logic.
bogus studies used on African males where poverty, lack of education, lack of health care, poor hygeine and superstitions are large factors in spreading of STDs
I know you need to use ad homs such as "obsession with removing foreskins" to feel like you are making a point, but I assure you, it's not helping your argument. An attempt to vilify rather than rationally debate the points is noticed. Now if you please, keep it to the topic. Helpful debating hint: I am not the topic.
Now moving on, of the functions you listed, the majority were for protective purposes. Those same purposes are achieved by the wearing of clothing rendering the usefulness of the foreskin void. I also don't care about the size of the foreskin on an adult male. Size of the foreskin does not translate into usefulness.
yes you do have a strong obsession with foreskin removal treating like it is a disease that must be removed from all males and is shocked and disgusted that there are people that defends to right of males to remain intact