Page 8 of 61 FirstFirst ... 6789101858 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 603

Thread: Call for higher circumcision rate

  1. #71
    Sage
    DeeJayH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Scooping Zeus' Poop
    Last Seen
    06-21-15 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    11,728

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by WI Crippler View Post
    Its a cultural practice that doesn't have any negative effects. I don't see why people get so up in arms about it, as if its a big deal whether or not a kid gets circ'ed. Its not as if its done to keep a man down or something. Hopefully my son won't think he's less of a man, because he's missing a little bit of foreskin. If he does, I haven't raised him right.
    and just how will you feel if he does not enjoy sex as much as he could have if you hadn't hacked the end of his cock off
    fwiw, i buthchered my son, but plan on discouraging him from continuing the practice

    Human Taxidermist - - now offering his services for all your loved ones
    Quote Originally Posted by jallman View Post
    How the hell did you just tie in a retroactive reparative measure with a proactive preventative measure. Not even close to being the same thing.

  2. #72
    Upper West Side Jacobin
    new coup for you's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philly, "The City that shoves you back!"
    Last Seen
    07-01-10 @ 01:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    10,643

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    I say to each his own. I'm wouldn't do it to a son of mine because I see no purpose in doing that.

    I also won't prevent anyone from doing it to their kid if they want because I see no purpose in doing that.


    I know plenty of girls (and guys) that consider foreskin a deal breaker.

    If you want your kid to get more repeats, cut it off.
    And why does your tone suggest that you do not care about children?

  3. #73
    Baby Eating Monster
    Korimyr the Rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Laramie, WY
    Last Seen
    11-23-17 @ 02:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    18,709
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by new coup for you View Post
    I know plenty of girls (and guys) that consider foreskin a deal breaker.

    If you want your kid to get more repeats, cut it off.
    Maybe I just don't get around as much, but I've never met a woman who had a problem with my foreskin.

  4. #74
    Sage
    DeeJayH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Scooping Zeus' Poop
    Last Seen
    06-21-15 @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    11,728

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by Korimyr the Rat View Post
    Maybe I just don't get around as much, but I've never met a woman who had a problem with my foreskin.
    what about the men

    Human Taxidermist - - now offering his services for all your loved ones
    Quote Originally Posted by jallman View Post
    How the hell did you just tie in a retroactive reparative measure with a proactive preventative measure. Not even close to being the same thing.

  5. #75
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,994

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
    Yeah, because cutting hair is EXACTLY like cutting off part of a penis.
    Says the woman who talks of flaying skin off an arm is the same as a snip of a small amount of skin on the penis.

    I figure if you want to play the hyperbolic game I could to. Additionally, if you're going to take the most literal interpritation of degrades appearance possible then why should it not apply across the board?

    Sure, it's not considered mutilation by most people in the US, but in over half the world - where the practice is NOT common - it most certainly IS mutilation.
    Oh, I see. So in U.S. its not considered it, but in the other countries it IS. Not considered, but IS.

    Well, naturally, because other cultures think its mutilation despite it not fitting the definition well it must be!

    No, a better analogy would be to cut off the female infant's outer labia or clitoral hood. That wouldn't be mutilation either, by your standard.
    I honestly can't speak on that. Does it provide any proven benefit outside of potentially looks? Does it have any significant chance of reducing sensation or use in anything more than an anecdotal way? Does it open up the area for any greater chance of infection or other issues?

    Circumsizing the penis helps with hygine so it has a tangable benefit. No credible study I've seen or heard from confirms that it has a significant chance of causing any actual reduction of stimulation or sensation. It does not raise ones chances to my knowledge of having any other medical issues involving the penis.

    If its like that, then no I wouldn't have a problem if people wanted to do it. I wouldn't do it to my children because the health benefit is obviously not worth while enough for it to become common practice and the looks of it would actually make them appear odd because it'd be so outside the norm. But if it had absolutely no impact on the way in which it function in all facets of its use, gave rise to no possible further medical issues, and had some kind of tangible benefit I'd not begrudge someone having it done to their baby. That said, I don't think those are true in the case you state but perhaps I'm wrong.

    Better to let the child decide for themselves if they want part of their body removed.
    Not really. I'll tell you personally I'm damn happy my parents did it, because the fear and apprehension I have for needles and surgery...let alone down there...would probably keep me from doing it at an older age while at the same time being upset that I don't have it done. Having it done at a baby was the best option, as I had it done and I have no memory what so ever.

  6. #76
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    04-23-17 @ 05:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    15,429
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJayH View Post
    and just how will you feel if he does not enjoy sex as much as he could have if you hadn't hacked the end of his cock off
    If he's anything like me, he doesn't need to have any more stimulation. What he loses in sensitivity, he'll gain in extra time which is beneficial to the lady. Then he won't have to think of Rosie O' Donnell to keep from ejaculating too early. Everybody wins.
    "Loyalty only matters when there's a hundred reasons not to be-" Gen. Mattis

  7. #77
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by new coup for you View Post
    I know plenty of girls (and guys) that consider foreskin a deal breaker.

    If you want your kid to get more repeats, cut it off.
    I want my kid to find someone who isn't so unbelievably shallow as to break up with him over a piece of skin.

  8. #78
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,994

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJayH View Post
    while orgasms are great, if they could be better due to higher sensitivity....
    [/LEFT]
    Funny, i looked at your link. While many things in it has citations there are absolutely 0 citations I see in reference to its claim of a reduction of sensitivity. As I said, if there's a few legitimate scientific studies that say that there is significant loss of sensitivity that's one thing...but I've seen no definitive universal view on it one way or another

  9. #79
    Goddess of Bacon

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Last Seen
    05-28-12 @ 09:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    13,988

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by WI Crippler View Post
    Its a cultural practice that doesn't have any negative effects. I don't see why people get so up in arms about it, as if its a big deal whether or not a kid gets circ'ed. Its not as if its done to keep a man down or something. Hopefully my son won't think he's less of a man, because he's missing a little bit of foreskin. If he does, I haven't raised him right.

    Totally.

    Its not as if [cutting off the clitoral hood] is done to keep a [wo]man down or something. Hopefully my [daughter] won't think she's less of a [wo]man, because she's missing a little bit of foreskin. If she does, I haven't raised her right.

    What's amazing to me is that you folks who are so adamant about mutilating your infant boys seem to be disgusted at the idea of doing the same exact thing to your infant girls.

  10. #80
    Goddess of Bacon

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Last Seen
    05-28-12 @ 09:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    13,988

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    I want my kid to find someone who isn't so unbelievably shallow as to break up with him over a piece of skin.
    Especially a piece of skin that's supposed to ****ing be there to begin with.

Page 8 of 61 FirstFirst ... 6789101858 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •