Page 31 of 61 FirstFirst ... 21293031323341 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 310 of 603

Thread: Call for higher circumcision rate

  1. #301
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    10-04-10 @ 04:41 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5,289

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    You know what bothers me most about the research that states this? It, by necessity, requires people who underwent circumcision later in life.

    That's just wrong.
    Just wait for our honeymoon

  2. #302
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by B L Zeebub View Post
    Just wait for our honeymoon
    Yikes!
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

  3. #303
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    10-04-10 @ 04:41 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    5,289

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by WillRockwell View Post
    Even trickier if it's a Jewish whale
    No you just send down popeye and olive mohel

  4. #304
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by B L Zeebub View Post
    No you just send down popeye and olive mohel
    Nice one!
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

  5. #305
    Sage
    Caine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    10-05-17 @ 01:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    23,336

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by sazerac View Post
    Before we wore clothes the foreskin protected the penis from abrasions.

    If you wear clothes you're not going to get abrasions.
    Well sir, I wear clothes.
    "I condemn the ideology of White Supremacy and Nazism. They are thugs, criminals, and repugnant, and are against what I believe to be "The American Way" "
    Thus my obligatory condemnation of White supremacy will now be in every post, lest I be accused of supporting it because I didn't mention it specifically every time I post.

  6. #306
    Sage
    Caine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    10-05-17 @ 01:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    23,336

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by WillRockwell View Post
    It is said that the foreskin enhances the sensitivity of the organ, resulting in a greatly heightened sexual experience.
    Mine is heightened enough for me.
    "I condemn the ideology of White Supremacy and Nazism. They are thugs, criminals, and repugnant, and are against what I believe to be "The American Way" "
    Thus my obligatory condemnation of White supremacy will now be in every post, lest I be accused of supporting it because I didn't mention it specifically every time I post.

  7. #307
    User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Last Seen
    06-26-11 @ 06:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    119

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Quote Originally Posted by kaya'08 View Post
    The foreskin has very little to almost no significance in protecting the glands considering the foreskin is very thin. In this case it has no effective purpose. The foreskin clogs up bacteria after excretion and sex and so ups the chance of sexual infection/disease transmission, and well, to put it simply, "nob cheese". When you bring into account these health factors and the whole point of the foreskin being there in the first place, its well worth considering circumcision. At most you will experience decreased sexual drive but not enough to notice. Theres no need or very little scientific reasoning to keep the foreskin in place. Unless of course you keep it for the sake of making your little maggot look bigger.
    The purpose of surgery is to repair body parts or amputate body parts which become diseased and threaten the life of the patients. Where under any medical code of ethics are doctors permitted to amputate body parts for cultural or religious reasons?

    Where under any medical code of ethics are doctors permitted to amputate normal body parts of children in order that they resemble their parents or their peers?




    FUNCTIONS

    Protection. The sleeve of tissue known as the foreskin normally covers the glans and protects it from abrasion, drying, callusing (keratinization), and environmental contaminants. The glans is intended by nature to be a protected internal organ, like the female clitoris [see illustration]. The effect of an exposed glans and resulting keratinization on human sexual response has never been studied. Increasing reports by circumcised men indicate that keratinization causes a loss of sexual sensation, pleasure and fulfillment [3, 4].

    3. Ridged bands. The inner foreskin contains bands of densely innervated, sexually responsive tissue [1]. They constitute a primary erogenous zone of the human penis and are important for realizing the fullness and intensity of sexual response [5].

    4. Gliding action. The foreskin is the only moving part of the penis. During any sexual activity, the foreskin and glans work in unison; their mutual interaction creates a complete sexual response. In heterosexual intercourse, the non-abrasive gliding of the penis in and out of itself within the vagina facilitates smooth and pleasurable intercourse for both partners [Blue_ArrowD096.gif (140 bytes)see illustration]. Without this gliding action, the corona of the circumcised penis can function as a one-way valve, dragging vaginal lubricants out into the drying air and making artificial lubricants essential for non-painful intercourse [6].

    5. Specialized sensory tissue. In addition to the "ridged bands" mentioned above, thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors (Meissnerís corpuscles) constitute the most important sensory component of the penis [1]. The foreskin contains branches of the dorsal nerve and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types, which are capable of sensing slight motion and stretch, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations in texture [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

    6. The frenulum. This is a highly nerve-laden web of tissue that tethers the inner foreskin to the underside of the glans [see photo]. It is similar to the frenula found under the tongue, the upper lip and the clitoral hood (female foreskin). For many intact men, the penile frenulum is a male "G-spot" that is highly pleasurable when repeatedly stretched and relaxed during sexual activity [13]. Depending on the surgical method used, the frenulum is partially to completely destroyed by circumcision.

    7. Proper blood flow. The foreskin contains several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery. The loss of this rich vascularization interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging the natural function of the penis and altering its development [1].

    8. Immunological defense. The soft mucosa of the inner foreskin produces plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies, and antibacterial and antiviral proteins [7, 14], such as the pathogen-killing enzyme called lysozyme [15 and Blue_ArrowD096.gif (140 bytes)see explanation]. All of the human mucosa (the linings of the mouth, eyelids, vagina, foreskin and anus) are the body's first line of defense against disease. This benefit of the foreskin could be one possible explanation why intact men are at lower risk of chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases [16-21].

    9. Langerhans cells. These specialized epithelial cells are a component of the immune system and may play a role in protecting the penis from sexually transmitted infections such as HIV (AIDS) [Blue_ArrowD096.gif (140 bytes)see explanation and 14-16, 18].

    10. Proper lymph flow. The foreskin contains lymphatic vessels, which are necessary for proper lymph flow and immunological functioning.

    11. Estrogen receptors. The foreskin contains estrogen receptors, whose purpose is not yet fully understood and needs further study [22].

    12. Apocrine glands. These glands produce pheromones, natureís invisible yet compelling signals to potential sexual partners. The effect of their absence on human sexual behavior has never been studied [23].

    13. Sebaceous glands. The oils produced by these glands lubricate and moisturize the foreskin and glans, so that the two structures function together smoothly.

    14. Dartos fascia. This is a smooth muscle sheath that underlies the scrotum, the entire penis and the tip of the foreskin. It is necessary for proper temperature regulation of the genitals (causing these structures to elongate in the heat and shrink in the cold). Approximately half of the Dartos fascia is destroyed by circumcision [7].

    15. Natural texture and coloration of the glans. In the intact penis, the glans normally appears moist, shiney, and pinkish-red to dark purple. These visual cues often attract and excite a sexual partner. The glans of a circumcised penis is dry, rough and often light pink to bluish-gray in color [see photos].

    The Foreskin Advantage: Benefits Enjoyed by Males who are Intact (not circumcised)

  8. #308
    User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Last Seen
    06-26-11 @ 06:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    119

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    MEDICAL FRAUD* and the criminal assault of boys

    Questions about circumcision...

    1. If victims of circumcision in Canada and the United States were female instead of male, would we be discussing the pros and cons of circumcision?

    2. Would any female in America undergo circumcision for any one of the reasons currently used to promote male circumcision, even if they were legitimate?

    3. Would any male dare write an article debating the pros and cons of female circumcision in Canada or the U.S.A.? If not, why not?

    4. Why are females in America who are so opposed to the mutilation of their own bodies or that of their daughters so willing to let their sons undergo a practice which they would find dehumanizing themselves? Surely what is good for the gander should be good for the goose.

    5. If female circumcision would be considered a form of child abuse or aggravated assault, would not the law apply equally to males, and if not, why not?

    6. Why would medical doctors require guidelines regarding unnecessary and mutilating surgery? Would not their professional ethics dictate that only medical necessary surgery be done, and only when there are no other forms of treatment are available? Does non-essential and mutilating surgery really have a place in modern medicine? Is this principle not already incorporated in the Hippocratic Oath , "First, Do No Harm"?

    7. If the amputation of normal, healthy body parts is an ethical therapeutic procedure used to prevent disease, would the amputation of other body parts such as routine mastectomies or hysterectomies also be acceptable? Today one in nine females develop breast cancer, and of these one in three die. Or is the male foreskin the only target?

    8. Is the amputation of normal body parts really a function of medical treatment? Would not the role of medicine in reality be more aptly described as one to preserve every part of our body as long as it is physically possible? Even a child would have no trouble understanding this concept?

    9. The laws in North America do not permit unnecessary, non-therapeutic surgery on non-consenting individuals. Neither are patients required to accept medical treatments regardless of the supposed medical benefits. The patient's right of choice is the basis of "informed consent". Does the possibility that a patient may receive some medical benefit from this irreversible surgery have precedence over his/her civil rights?

    10. Why is it that only in the U.S.A. and Canada there is the possibility of all these terrible things happening to intact males? Why are these problems seldom seen in any other nations of the world where most males remain intact? Do the advocates of circumcision really believe that they can eradicate all forms of penile cancer, AIDS, STD, urinary tract infections or any other so- called conditions attributed to the foreskin? If so, let's amputate all foreskins and totally eliminate these problems. Intelligent members of the medical profession readily admit that these conditions would still exist, and probably in the same numbers, but now only in circumcised males.

    11. If it were proven that circumcision of females would prevent penile cancer in males, would they advocates of FGM recommend female circumcision in order to prevent cancer in males? If not, Why not?

  9. #309
    Professor
    OxymoronP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Heart in Brooklyn, body South of Dixie
    Last Seen
    08-23-10 @ 11:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,175

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Mine is already Shnipped, so I am safe!!


    THE GREATEST FREEDOM IS THE FREEDOM TO OPPRESS OTHERS

  10. #310
    User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Last Seen
    06-26-11 @ 06:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    119

    Re: Call for higher circumcision rate

    Most american males are "snipped"

Page 31 of 61 FirstFirst ... 21293031323341 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •