This is your statement not mine,click on the link it is your post-
http://www.debatepolitics.com/1057970817-post120.html
Hell no I didn't read the whole thing...even if you wanted to your enlistment would be over by the time you finished. It's like a metro phonebook for NYC, LA, Tokyo, and Russia all wrapped in one. My recruiter told me about the IRR but the way he explained it was this:
You claimed it was not part of your contract and not only that in the same post you claimed that the military can call you back to service after your last day of service.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/1057970450-post55.html
Stop Loss is not a part of the Contract. It is something that can be instituted or withdrawn at anytime, which is why Second of Def Gates has recently rescinded the program. If it was "part of the contract" it would not be carte blanche. There is a part of the contract for IRR committments (inactive ready reserves) which means once your enlisted term is up and you've left the military it can call you back to active duty for up to 8 years after your last date of service.
How are you going to claim you didn't say those things? IS someone else posting as you?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/1057970817-post120.html
Hell no I didn't read the whole thing...even if you wanted to your enlistment would be over by the time you finished. It's like a metro phonebook for NYC, LA, Tokyo, and Russia all wrapped in one. My recruiter told me about the IRR but the way he explained it was this:
Then why make up a bunch of bull **** that contracts are the size of phonebooks,that there is no stoploss in your contract?DO you have a dd 214?
No one is changing what you said.It is you who is changing what you said. First you claim stop loss is not part of your contract and then you claim its buried and then when it is pointed out to you that it is not you still stick to your claim it is slavery.
You made bogus claims support one your liberal notions that stop loss is a back door draft.
No one misquoted you.
You did change your claims.
.
-military contracts are a back door draft
-Its impossible to read the whole contract because they are the size of metropolitan phonebooks
-the military is making you stay longer than your enlistment
-stop loss is not part of the contract
-you can be called back to service up to 8 years of your last date of service
-Stop loss is slavery
Surely a vet wouldn't imply all the bull**** you just stated. My contract wasn't the size of a metropolitan phone books and I am sure no one else's was either. If you really did serve then you should have a little packet with all your forms/contract in it or at least copies of those things in it and you can see that what you said is bull ****.
You are making dishonest claims like the ones above as well as the idiotic leftist lie that this war is illegal and then you are claiming that somehow what you said are examples of what other vets have stated. You are the one being dishonest. We can pull up your past post on this site.If I click on your user name a menue pops up and I can select "find more post by SkyCore" or I can just read this thread. So you should try very hard not to lie.
You tried to use McCain as some sort conservative reference to support your claim that stop loss is controversial, you are making the claim that stop loss is a back door draft(only libs do those things) and you are uttering the liberal lie that the war in Iraq is illegal(only libs do those things), who the hell are you to call anyone a liberal?