I'm a partisan, but it seems holding clear, consistent Conservative values and trying to unpartisanize the opposition from their nice intentions but flawed logic makes you "hyper-hyper."
Same goes with having fun with the wackos in their party to try and illustrate what they're linked to.
YouTube - Scooter - Hyper Hyper
Last edited by zimmer; 03-19-09 at 12:23 PM.
I AM DEPLORABLE.
NEVER CRIMINAL HILLARY (S-NY)
Sounds pretty easy. Determining who is actually responsible might be a bit difficult.Make the employment of more than five illegal aliens a felony and start putting their employers in the federal penitentiary.
Hefty fines would have the same effect and not cost nearly as much as incarcerating people. The problem as it stands is that there are no real consequences because we aren't enforcing the laws we already have. Besides if your theory were true, you would see much less white collar crime, and that is what this is when it comes to hiring illegals. People who are intent on committing crime will not focus on the incarceration part, they will focus on how to not get caught.That'll deter the crap out of the illegal alien business.
Hyper partisan is a very apt term when applied to people like zimmer and TD for example. I don't mind that they hold "consistent conservative values," it's their blind allegiance to the mantra that all things liberal are automatically bad and their constant caterwauling and gross categorization of "democrats" and "liberals." It's ignorant. The same can be said for certain posters on the left.
There are posters on this forum that you know are true blue conservatives but don't frequently engage in making broad and sweeping comments in which they lump all people of a particular political persuasion together just because.
Hyper partisan works.
Last edited by Lerxst; 03-19-09 at 12:29 PM.
The Constitution of the United States: Amendments 11-27 From that link
Sounds like a violation of her duty as a sworn congresswoman to me. This guy summed it up well Committing Treason, and here is article III, section 3: FindLaw: U.S. Constitution: Article III: Annotations pg. 24 of 25 While treason is overused it could be applied to Pelosi's statements relatively easily. As far as terrorists go, if you use terror to get your point across you are a terrorist, many environmental and animal rights groups in the U.S. qualify as much as the Wahabi sects of the middle east. I'm not assigning treason to Pelosi cause I hate her, only because she basically fits the definition this time.Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.