• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Can Marijuana Help Rescue California's Economy?

YouTube - Marijuana and Driving

Here is a long term user of marijuana, that drives before and after smoking a joint, and they test how well he drives while high.

The long term user of marijuana drives better after smoking a joint than before smoking the joint.

If you have a problem with smoking it, I suggest cannabutter, which is a process where you take take the stuff that makes you high from marijuana and puts them into butter so you can cook with them.




Here is an exact example as to what I touched upon at the beginning of this thread.

1. its not about driving, it is about being high. And to think og how people make excuses for what they do while piloting a 3000 lb missile..... :shock:

2. this is one anecdotal incident on TV, and we know the TV never lies. :roll:

3. driving while high, no matter how much of a burned out dickhead you are, still endangers people who follow the law, like me.
 
Of course you would draw that conclusion. I draw a different one. He indicated that he felt more paranoia and his perception was distorted...he felt he was driving slower than he actually was. Also, he didn't say he could more easily concentrate...he said he had to force himself to concentrate more. These are all impairments, that he indicated, showing that his perception was affected by the marijuana. I do not want him driving when high, nor anyone else. Your video proves my position.

And if the butter gives the same response, than I would feel the same way about the butter.

You are doing what many pro-legals do. Providing incorrect information that is easily refuted. This will force those on the cusp to reject your position. You are not helping yourself, here.





+1000000000
 
So you're okay with selling pot next to the beer stands at ballparks??

;)

You're so transparent glass thinks you're see through.

You say you have no agenda then you post drivel like this. Read my posts, as I stated, in regards to the legality of sales and possession and things surrounding it I'd suggest following the general outline we have for liquor while in regards to laws against its use in public places I'd go with cigarettes as a model due to the smoke of it.

I also believe in the free market.

If its not illegal for smoking to be done at a ballpark, and a ballpark decides it wants to sell marijuana, then I have no issue with it at all to be sold like they sell liquor drinks at games (well, at least they do at football games. Not been to a pro baseball game).

Personally however, I imagine that the free market would take care of this and they wouldn't sell them at a baseball game due to not wanting to sell something that is obviously going to potentially cause annoyance to other patrons through the smoke.

Simply put, no, I don't think we need to definitively copy another country. I think its idiotic to go "lets do like that country". Lets figure out a solution based on the needs of OUR nation and based on what is standard in OUR nation. By using common sense laws taken from Alcohol and Cigarettes and adapting it to Marijuana we create laws that make sense and are easily understood by the population because it has something to relate to.

And yet people still do it, some risking the lives of others for their weed. :roll:

Yep, just like people still risk their lives and the lives of others for their alcohol, extemely late nights with next to no sleep, and cell phones.
 
Yep, just like people still risk their lives and the lives of others for their alcohol, extemely late nights with next to no sleep, and cell phones.




I keep hearing this from several "weed" posters. Not saying you are one of them, I saw your post that you don't smoke weed. But yes of course distracted drivers are deadly. It is amazing what little care some people show when piloting a 3000lb missile.

I ride motorcycles, I am all to aware as to how bad many drivers really are. Including cops.

However, in this discussion, the scope pertains to "Weed" and those who think they are any different because its weed, and they want to excuse thier behavior for a varying of reasons....


Just like the drunk in my post about my lunch at legal seafood the other day. It reminded me of some who think they can behave a certain way and excuse it because they like the drug and culture they do.
 
I keep hearing this from several "weed" posters. Not saying you are one of them, I saw your post that you don't smoke weed. But yes of course distracted drivers are deadly. It is amazing what little care some people show when piloting a 3000lb missile.

I ride motorcycles, I am all to aware as to how bad many drivers really are. Including cops.

However, in this discussion, the scope pertains to "Weed" and those who think they are any different because its weed, and they want to excuse thier behavior for a varying of reasons....


Just like the drunk in my post about my lunch at legal seafood the other day. It reminded me of some who think they can behave a certain way and excuse it because they like the drug and culture they do.


Oh, I agree. The people who act like smoking weed makes them BETTER drivers or that its okay are arguing an idiotic argument and generally are ones I dismiss. However you were responding to Hautey, who wasn't advocating it, when he was talking about the legality of it.

What does the fact that Weed smokers do it now have to do with it being illegal now and likely illegal afterwards?

You get called on your comment and then say something alone the lines "of well of course other things are bad too" but the way you post and the way you're talking about it you're making it out as if you believe that somehow heavy Weed smokers are this strange minority which are the only ones stupid enough to do something dumb like driving while impaired in some way, when they're just one in a long line of people.
 
Oh, I agree. The people who act like smoking weed makes them BETTER drivers or that its okay are arguing an idiotic argument and generally are ones I dismiss. However you were responding to Hautey, who wasn't advocating it, when he was talking about the legality of it.


You do understand, at this point I am walking a 6a line here, and Can not respond to this appropriately other than to say, I can show you via pm, where he more than "Advocated it".

What does the fact that Weed smokers do it now have to do with it being illegal now and likely illegal afterwards?


I am not sure I was making that argument. What is it you think I responded to and what position did you think hautey had?


I thought my response to him made my position clear. That some who smoke weed, think it has no effect on thier driving, so much so they would risk others in thier activities.

Making it legal, would not change the illegal behavior of driving high.


You get called on your comment and then say something alone the lines "of well of course other things are bad too" but the way you post and the way you're talking about it you're making it out as if you believe that somehow heavy Weed smokers are this strange minority which are the only ones stupid enough to do something dumb like driving while impaired in some way, when they're just one in a long line of people.


Come on zyph, please re-read my posts. I think, and I have stated numerous times that all the things mentioned are bad. I am simply being topical here.

I have started threads on almost being killed by a cop on a cell phone.

I have also made my position clear in threads by aps I think about drunk drivers.

I have also discussed my positions on cell phones, books, makeup and driving.

And in none of those do I mention weed. Does that mean I held the opposite of your contention in those threads?



Again, I have a true hatred of idiot drivers and the varying tools they use to try to kill me. I hope this and my other posts including my legal seafood anecdotal puts to rest your notion that I think weed smokers are a special breed of idiots... .


Anyway, since this topic is weed:


I will say this though, The ones i have described, the ones who make weed thier lives, This is from my experience true, from relatives, to growing up in the VT, Colorado Snowboarding culture. There are those who make what they are doing, whether its snowboarding, riding a motorcycle, skiing, driving, taking care of thier child, to anything else that they do. To them it is ABOUT the weed first as a life crutch.


I find it a pathetic existence, and yes, That goes for drunks as well. but this topic is weed.
 
Please link to studies regarding no one developing lung cancer or other health issues because pot's smoke is actually a good thing to stick in your lungs.....

Prove to me that you can indeed die from smoking marijuana. You can not die from smoking marijuana. You can die from LUNG CANCER but not from smoking marijuana. There is no such thing as a marijuana overdose. However if you drink enough alcohol you can die from ALCOHOL POISONING.

marijuana overdose by drug overdose.com

The Drug Awareness Warning Network Annual Report, published by the US federal government contains a statistical compilation of all drug deaths which occur in the United States. According to this report, there has never been a death recorded from the use of marijuana by natural causes. Unlike opiates, barbiturates or amphetamines, there seems to be little risk from the use of large amounts of marijuana. When a person smokes too much they feel very tired and lie down. When people swallow large amounts of hashish, occasionally they get sick to their stomach.

Accidental alcohol poisoning mortality in the United States, 1996-1998 - NIAAA'S Epidemiological Bulletin No.40 | Alcohol Research & Health | Find Articles at BNET

Data on deaths ascribed to alcohol poisoning as either the underlying cause or as 1 of up to 20 contributing causes were selected and analyzed. The annual average number of deaths for which alcohol poisoning was listed as an underlying cause was 317, with an age-adjusted death rate of 0.11 per 100,000 population. An average of 1,076 additional deaths included alcohol poisoning as a contributing cause, bringing the total number of deaths with any mention of alcohol poisoning to 1,393 per year (0.49 per 100,000 population).

Want to try again?

I love speculative claims!

Specially when YOU create them. ;)

Also consider no one has been made smarter by smoking it either, YMMV.... :lol:

Nobody's ever been made healthier by drinking and making their liver 'suffer'. ;)
 
Last edited:
Prove to me that you can indeed die from smoking marijuana. You can not die from smoking marijuana. You can die from LUNG CANCER but not from smoking marijuana. There is no such thing as a marijuana overdose. However if you drink enough alcohol you can die from ALCOHOL POISONING.

marijuana overdose by drug overdose.com



Accidental alcohol poisoning mortality in the United States, 1996-1998 - NIAAA'S Epidemiological Bulletin No.40 | Alcohol Research & Health | Find Articles at BNET


What is the point of you stating what is already known. You can die of alchohol poisioning. Wow. Debate points for you. :doh:roll:


Want to try again?



Specially when YOU create them. ;)


Which claim did I make was speculative. See you are playing a semantics game for your weed fetish. I find that sad. Anyways. Weed can cause health problems, including making you sick enough to die via cancer and other health issues of inhaling smoke.


Nobody's ever been made healthier by drinking and making their liver 'suffer'. ;)



No ****. Thanks captain obvious. How does this excuse weed, you know the topic at hand?



Fact is hautey, I support your right to pollute yourself. I believe in freedom all around. Liberty over prohibition. I am not so shallow to only support liberties that I like.
 
Last edited:
What is the point of you stating what is already known. You can die of alchohol poisioning. Wow. Debate points for you. :doh:roll:

Are you being obtuse on purpose? I stated that marijuana should be legalized on the basis that as a drug it does not have one of the most dangerous side effects(like for example death) of other drugs and legal substances like alcohol.

Which claim did I make was speculative.

See your previous post. Wow. That was really easy.

See you are playing a semantics game for your weed fetish.

Semantics :

semantics - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

1: the study of meanings: a: the historical and psychological study and the classification of changes in the signification of words or forms viewed as factors in linguistic development b (1): semiotic (2): a branch of semiotic dealing with the relations between signs and what they refer to and including theories of denotation, extension, naming, and truth

2: general semantics

3 a: the meaning or relationship of meanings of a sign or set of signs ; especially : connotative meaning b: the language used (as in advertising or political propaganda) to achieve a desired effect on an audience especially through the use of words with novel or dual meanings

Uhhh no. I'm not. Do you know what semantics mean?

I find that sad.

I find drunks to be sad. I guess we're about even.


Anywho.

Weed can cause health problems,

Like alcohol.

including making you sick enough to die via cancer and other health issues of inhaling smoke.

And alcohol can kill you on your first drinking binge. You can not possibly smoke enough weed to die from it after one time use. However drink enough alcohol and irregardless of how many times you've tried it before you can die.

No ****. Thanks captain obvious. How does this excuse weed, you know the topic at hand?

Oooh a little touchy. I already explained to you. Your attacks on marijuana and it's users are a tad hypocritical the moment alcohol is brought up.

Fact is hautey, I support your right to pollute yourself.

I support yours to drink yourself to death.

I believe in freedom all around.

I believe in drinking all around. Wait.....

Liberty over prohibition. I am not so shallow to only support liberties that I like.

Yawn. Save it for Amazing Grace.
 
go for it California!!!
But, restrictions to legally buy it or smoke it is to be over 21, gainfully employed, and not on welfare or food stamps.

Maybe being 21, but I prefer 18 for all with everything. The rest of what you said, no. If it's legal it's legal, and that's it.

I have severe pain, and I haven't tried it yet, but it is available in pill form, and guess what, it costs over $1,350.00 a mo for 2 pills a day. That's at a reduced insurance rate. How ludicrous. Doctor's aren't really allowed to treat people with chronic pain in a sense because all those drugs are "addicting" which is again, ludicrous. When you need them, and know you'll only get 120 pills a month, you aren't going to abuse them, trust me.

I'm so bad off I truly don't know what I'm going to do, and yes, I've tried everything. This is one thing I was hoping Obama would help the country with, and it's this antiquated way of looking at everything.

Personally, if we are going to go down the toilet, we're probably lucky we haven't done so a long time ago.
 
Apparently your illiteracy is toped only by your political ignorance.

Here's your sign :2wave:

still off topic....and if you are going to accuse me of being illiterate, please use proper spelling....:2razz:
It makes you look stoooo-pid...
 
Are you being obtuse on purpose? I stated that marijuana should be legalized on the basis that as a drug it does not have one of the most dangerous side effects(like for example death) of other drugs and legal substances like alcohol.


I say over and over again it should be legal. Put down the bong and pay attention.

It is you being dishonest by suggesting weed is a harmless substance.

FAIL

See your previous post. Wow. That was really easy.

FAIL

Semantics :

semantics - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary



Uhhh no. I'm not. Do you know what semantics mean?


FAIL


I find drunks to be sad. I guess we're about even.


Me too. I am not a drunk, I drink on occasion socially, and almost never to excess, (three is a maximum for me when out, as its not part of my diet to have that many carbs) never around children, and never when driving.


So even? Not even close. I am a responsible drinker. You are an admitted daily weed smoker who puts weed before anything else.


So calling me a drunk? FAIL

Anywho.



Like alcohol.


You keep bringing up alchohol as if I am defending alchohol, making a value judgment of one over the other.


FAIL


And alcohol can kill you on your first drinking binge. You can not possibly smoke enough weed to die from it after one time use. However drink enough alcohol and irregardless of how many times you've tried it before you can die.


As can drinking too much water. What is your point? Do you even remember it? What position of mine do you think you are even arguing against? :lol:


Oooh a little touchy. I already explained to you. Your attacks on marijuana and it's users are a tad hypocritical the moment alcohol is brought up.


How so? I probably drink socially 3-4 times a month, almost never to excess, and NEVER when I am driving.

The only reason I didn't call the cops on that asshole at legal seafood was because I had no service. I laid into the barkeep about letting him leave as well.

I find those who drive under the influence of a recreational substance, abhorrent scum.


You are trying to lower me to a pathetic way of living. I am nothing like those who drive drunk or high.... FAIL



I support yours to drink yourself to death.


Freedom is a bitch.


I believe in drinking all around. Wait.....

idiotic non response, incoherent rambling, pass.


Yawn. Save it for Amazing Grace.



Yeah, cause freedom to you is what you can get for yourself... noted.
 
Last edited:
Maybe being 21, but I prefer 18 for all with everything. The rest of what you said, no. If it's legal it's legal, and that's it.

I have severe pain, and I haven't tried it yet, but it is available in pill form, and guess what, it costs over $1,350.00 a mo for 2 pills a day. That's at a reduced insurance rate. How ludicrous. Doctor's aren't really allowed to treat people with chronic pain in a sense because all those drugs are "addicting" which is again, ludicrous. When you need them, and know you'll only get 120 pills a month, you aren't going to abuse them, trust me.

I'm so bad off I truly don't know what I'm going to do, and yes, I've tried everything. This is one thing I was hoping Obama would help the country with, and it's this antiquated way of looking at everything.

Personally, if we are going to go down the toilet, we're probably lucky we haven't done so a long time ago.

There are a lot of single issue voters out there who think that THEIR issue, if not addressed correctly, will put the USA in a fast slide to oblivion, or hell....
I have always been against Pot for the sole reason that it is illegal and getting caught impacts your chances at getting good jobs. But if it was legal I would have no more objections to it than smokes or alchohol..regulate it and tax it all you want, since it fits somewhere between smokes and liquor for impact on society....
 
It could lift some of the burdens off of the Californian budget. If you legalize it and tax it, your already saving the wasteful amounts of money spent on police, court and prison resources to keep people from toking up. Saving the state economy though is quite a long shot, there would have to be alot more reform besides legalization of marijuana to do that.
 
Here is an exact example as to what I touched upon at the beginning of this thread.

1. its not about driving, it is about being high. And to think og how people make excuses for what they do while piloting a 3000 lb missile..... :shock:

2. this is one anecdotal incident on TV, and we know the TV never lies. :roll:

3. driving while high, no matter how much of a burned out dickhead you are, still endangers people who follow the law, like me.

All I wanted to show is you can smoke marijuana to improve your focus, those conditions are not the same conditions you would see on road. I do not promote smoking marijuana and driving, I just want to show that you can smoke to improve focus for simple things.
 
All I wanted to show is you can smoke marijuana to improve your focus, those conditions are not the same conditions you would see on road. I do not promote smoking marijuana and driving, I just want to show that you can smoke to improve focus for simple things.





Oh man, I re-read that. Did I call you a dickhead? :lol: I didn't mean too..... :rofl
 
I'm not really sure that there would be a market for weed bars. The reason they exist in Amsterdam is because weed being legal is a novelty which attracts tourism. However, if weed was legal on the scale of the United State's largest state I think, at least for the people of California, the novelty would diminish quickly. And then it would be a question of whether weed really lends itself to bars.

I don't really think it does, at least not in the way alcohol lends itself to bars. Booze is a social drug, lots of people go to bars and meet people, it's the purpose of the establishment. I don't think weed lends itself to that kind of socialization.

I also don't think that letting people smoke pot in bars is a good idea. People who are stoned and drunk just become retarded and don't enjoy either effectively.
 
I say over and over again it should be legal. Put down the bong and pay attention.

It is you being dishonest by suggesting weed is a harmless substance.

FAIL

Post? Where did I say weed was harmless?

FAIL

You mean showing you the definition of words you clearly do not know how to use?


Are you having a seizure? Put down the beer bottle son.

Me too. I am not a drunk, I drink on occasion socially, and almost never to excess, (three is a maximum for me when out, as its not part of my diet to have that many carbs) never around children, and never when driving.

So even? Not even close. I am a responsible drinker. You are an admitted daily weed smoker who puts weed before anything else.

So calling me a drunk? FAIL

My lungs are in perfect working condition according to my last check up. Is your liver?

always been..... though this liver is prolly useless..... :lol:


You keep bringing up alchohol as if I am defending alchohol, making a value judgment of one over the other.

No. I am bringing up alcohol as a reference to how weed should be handled. Try again?


Seriously, are you having a seizure?

As can drinking too much water.

Pssst. Water is legal.

What is your point? Do you even remember it? What position of mine do you think you are even arguing against? :lol:

Your hypocrisy. Weed smokers bad. Ruining your liver! Funny!

How so? I probably drink socially 3-4 times a month, almost never to excess, and NEVER when I am driving.

And yet your liver is useless according to you.

The only reason I didn't call the cops on that asshole at legal seafood was because I had no service. I laid into the barkeep about letting him leave as well.

I find those who drive under the influence of a recreational substance, abhorrent scum.

I'm driving in about an hour to town. Gotta start rolling.

You are trying to lower me to a pathetic way of living. I am nothing like those who drive drunk or high.... FAIL

always been..... though this liver is prolly useless..... :lol:

Freedom is a bitch.

And then you die?


idiotic non response, incoherent rambling, pass.

Yeah, cause freedom to you is what you can get for yourself... noted.

Huh? Seriously, do you want me to call you a doctor? You seem to have drunk so much that your liver is creating some biological interference with your brain and finger tips. You keep typing fail like you're getting your point across or something....
 
All I wanted to show is you can smoke marijuana to improve your focus, those conditions are not the same conditions you would see on road. I do not promote smoking marijuana and driving, I just want to show that you can smoke to improve focus for simple things.

Isn't it good for glaucoma? That is a real bummer to have. Even with treatment you sometimes go blind.
 
Oh man, I re-read that. Did I call you a dickhead? :lol: I didn't mean too..... :rofl

I notice you are like a lot of the posters being you have a pro drug stance, but are not attacking the root of the problem with drug legislation. The federal government shouldn't have the right or ability to restrict the sale of anything.

We get caught up in restricting things because they are deamed not socially acceptable. The states are the ones who are to decide what can be socially accepted in there areas as long as it is something that does not conflict others rights.
 
Post? Where did I say weed was harmless?

FAIL

You mean showing you the definition of words you clearly do not know how to use?



Are you having a seizure? Put down the beer bottle son.


Oh reduced to personal attacks. FAIL


My lungs are in perfect working condition according to my last check up. Is your liver?


sure is. I already stated I don't drink like some smoke. "short term"....


No. I am bringing up alcohol as a reference to how weed should be handled. Try again?


And I agreed that it should be handled like alcohol, short term issues hautey? :lol:


Seriously, are you having a seizure?

Personal attacks.


Pssst. Water is legal.

Irrellevant


Your hypocrisy. Weed smokers bad. Ruining your liver! Funny!

Where did I say weed smokers bad? I said chronic weed smokers are dirtbags like drunks.

I am neither. My liver is perfect. Thank you for your concern.


And yet your liver is useless according to you.

:lol: is it useless or was it a "funny" please concentrate on your attacks please. Your utter failure is rather humorous given your divergent points about me.

I'm driving in about an hour to town. Gotta start rolling.

I can not comment due to the VEGAS rule.


Huh? Seriously, do you want me to call you a doctor? You seem to have drunk so much that your liver is creating some biological interference with your brain and finger tips. You keep typing fail like you're getting your point across or something....


More personal attacks. Please exhibit a modicum of self control. thank you.
 
Isn't it good for glaucoma? That is a real bummer to have. Even with treatment you sometimes go blind.

That is the wrong pro-drug argument, Marijuana advocates should parade little jimmy with glaucoma around to get what they want done.

If you are pro-drug advocate attack the argument where it starts, the federal government should not have the right to restrict what I can and cannot put into my body. All anti-drug arguments are summed up to a larger group of society imposing it's will on the low small minority class.

This can be said why in England Gin was illegal in 1800's but liquor was legal, liquor ws to expensive for the poor countrymen to afford while gin having the same alcohol content was illegal.

Marijuana was originally made illegal because they thought only dirty mexicans smoked it, and it made you go crazy. Ever since then it has been excuse after excuse why it is not allowed, and finally the people of california are fed up of the federal government restricting there rights to delegate on this issue.
 
I think there's a few reasons weed remains illegal.

First is the lingering 60s cultural conflict. The right is still made that they couldn't actually make being a hippy illegal, so by God they'll make as many of the things hippies like illegal as possible.

Second and I think most prominently is the prison-industrial complex. They know where their money comes from and they have plenty of lobbyists.

Third is that weed being illegal gives the police vastly expanded search rights. Since weed in most cities is ubiquitous it gives the police a legal way to search and detain nearly anyone, since nearly everyone has weed.
 
I think there's a few reasons weed remains illegal.

First is the lingering 60s cultural conflict. The right is still made that they couldn't actually make being a hippy illegal, so by God they'll make as many of the things hippies like illegal as possible.

Second and I think most prominently is the prison-industrial complex. They know where their money comes from and they have plenty of lobbyists.

Third is that weed being illegal gives the police vastly expanded search rights. Since weed in most cities is ubiquitous it gives the police a legal way to search and detain nearly anyone, since nearly everyone has weed.




"No sir, I do not give you consent to search this vehicle. May I go?"


repeat.
 
Back
Top Bottom