it is absurd you can not grasp the concept of an analogy and what it is actually analogous to when it is used.
let me walk you through step by step here this
The california budget is losing money.. analogous to blood.
you put more money (blood) into the coffers (body)
You have breathing room to figure out the cause of the bleeding (loss of money) and do something about it.
it is absurd that you abstracted my analogy was encompassing politicians pandering for votes, and their spending habits -although it can be incorporated into it- this is the cause of the bleeding, something the infusion will enable them to focus on, and hopefully quell.
It is also equally absurd that supposition on what may or may not happen is a valid argument why it will not save the economy. The question is what can be done now to help, and whether taxation of marijuana can help the situation faced currently. What politicians may or may not do in the future with the revenues is moot. If they cut themselves again, then it is completely their fault that they bleed to death, at least an attempt was made to stop the bleeding from the current wound.