- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I don't think you can find a historical reference for a global war on terror and how to react to it.
try any war.
I don't think you can find a historical reference for a global war on terror and how to react to it.
And whom have we imprisoned that is currently still there that shouldn't be?
j-mac
Oh brother...:roll: You really don't know what that phrase meant? :shock:
Well, you made my point quite clearly, thank you. You don't believe that we are at war with Muslim fundamentalists radicals therefore you see our actions as ignoble....In order to reach this I have to conclude that you are a product of hours and hours of indoctrination from such sources as Keith Olberman of MSNBC defame, or Amy Goodman of Democracy Now defame. In either case talking points are little argument for the truth of the matter, and I just have little use for dupes or propaganda spreaders....sorry.
j-mac
No, I know what the phrase meant. I was being sarcastic. I realize that its hard to denote sarcasm from text.
No, I just think that the War on Terror began as a farce considering that we went after Iraq when people still wanted justice for what happened on 9/11. Muslim fundamentalists are obviously a problem and now they are more than ever since the Iraq war. So I personally feel that we created a lot of these problems on our own. As for your conclusion you are incorrect. I detest MSNBC even more than Fox. I know who Amy Goodman is, but I've never actually heard her speak. I'm sure it's the same typical hardcore left wing garbage, though. And I have little use of people who draw major conclusions based on little information and stereotypes.
Who knows? The whole thing is in a cloak of secrecy.
So I told you as soon as you asked. Why you are harping on nonsense is beyond me but not unexpected.
I corrected you. You started crying about baiting. Not my problem.
Your tone, your paranoia about being baited. No one is baiting here except for you. And I am laughing, and its not with you.
Note your lack of addressing the actual topic. Who is baiting?
It is in my opinion, and no offense. but when posters refuse to address the topic and instead pounds the poster relentlessly, I question thier intellectual prowess.... Do you really want me to think of you as intellectually wanting?
Thanks!
Then how can you be so sure of your position?
j-mac
Since you are being hyper-partisan, I am not surprised by your answer.
They all but admit it.
Western Standard
I am sorry you can't see the "we need to pass all this spending or we are doomed" fear mongering....
what were we doing before that again?
You vaguely answered my question, and if that's all I can expect from you I will stop asking.
Not once did I cry about you baiting. I criticized you of pulling your business as usual baiting stunts which you are still doing. Keep trying, though. Let's see how many more pathetic macho man insults you can sling at me. :roll:
Uh huh. Are you going to actually put me on ignore like you threatened are are you just going to hurl more lame insults?
I asked you a legitimate question regarding your views and you got defensive and accused me of personally attacking you, which I wasn't. Then you started to hurl your typical lame insults in an attempt to bait me.
Yes, it is your opinion and I wanted you to clarify because it seems that you are being hypocritical by blaming this on someone other than Bush which you most likely wouldn't do that if the situation were flipped and it was Obama in the hot seat. You said that you blame Bush, but nowhere in your original post does it indicate that.
Well, you are right, I shouldn't draw conclusion so quickly upon arriving here, my apologies.:blushing2 I came from another site where I am pretty well known, and habits got the better of me....I will observe more...
j-mac
I do admit that the "pass this stimulus package or we are doomed!" economy crap is fear mongering. I thought we were talking about war-related fear mongering.
Well, we weren't imprisoning them outside of our borders so that the Geneva Conventions don't apply to them.
If Obama was pressured by Rush Limbaugh to release prisoners from gitmo and he caved into pressure to do so, I'd have the same opinion.
Irrellevant belly aching. Not interested.,
Never said I was going to put you on ignore, I was letting you know, that I just might not respond to you. My perogative.
And again you are still crying. Get over it and discuss the topic, not this lame ass cry fest.
I did no such thing. Please lets be honest here, I know you are upset, but there is no need for prevarication.
So what, once again when you asked me, I clarified. You want to argue a position I never held.
Get over it and debate my actual position, not the lame ass straw man you are trying to build. And please can you stop with the tantrum and stick to the topic?
Yes, it is a terrorist factory.
I don't think Gitmo should have existed in the first place.
On trial perhaps and if guilty, jail?
Put an innocent person in their.......and wallah you have a new terrorist that hates the USA.
What a specious and absurd claim.
What I said if you put an innocent person in there is a high probability they will come out hating the USA. There really is no need to put words in my mouth. Some COULD be innocent others could not.
Dood, seriously, take the tampon out. It's not a big deal. You wanted to talk about me, So I responded in kind. IF you don't want to be the subject, don't make other posters the subject. Simple as that. :lamo
And if you think I am baiting you. Stop crying about it and report me. Just stop mucking up threads with your personal drama.
That is all I am going to say about it, I will only address your on topic posts and strike out your whining and baiting. Sorry.
Not trying to put words in anyones mouth, sorry if you think so. But the fact remains that you are saying, and correct me if I am wrong here, but you are saying that we have imprisoned innocents in Gitmo right? and then I asked how you know that and you said that we can't because of the secrecy. So therefore your assumption of imprisoning innocents is really nothing more than speculation on your part, that's all.
j-mac
Right back at ya....*plonk*
I discussed your personal views on the subject, not you personally. Perhaps the tough macho guy insults work with other people but they don't work with me. They just come off as lame. Keep trying though. :lol:
Nah, that would only legitimize your pathetic insults and baiting. I personally could care less. I think it's funny that you think I'm getting upset by all of this, though.
Uh huh. Pot meet kettle.
That's all you have. I haven't made the specious and absurd claim; that sits with you. And the best you have is the idiotic notion that the people at Gitmo were "innocent" sobs who loved us until we illegally grabbed them off the streets while minding their own business and put them in Gitmo.
Do you live to be wrong almost ALL of the time; or do you just do this stupid nonsense to troll threads and drag the thread IQ down? :roll:
And them being guilty is speculation as well *shrug*