Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: 'Octomom bill' would limit embryo implants

  1. #11
    Upper West Side Jacobin
    new coup for you's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Philly, "The City that shoves you back!"
    Last Seen
    06-30-10 @ 11:13 PM

    Re: 'Octomom bill' would limit embryo implants

    Yeah I think the government having a private meeting with the medical community and explaining how they really don't want to regulate the situation but they will if the community doesn't start regulating itself would be the best scenario.
    And why does your tone suggest that you do not care about children?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Seen
    03-04-09 @ 02:48 PM

    Thumbs down Re: 'Octomom bill' would limit embryo implants

    Where were the safeguards to begin with? Was the in vitro paid for by state/federal assistance? If so, why? Limiting the number that can be implanted is not the answer if a woman with no husband and no income can get in vitro in the first place. Someone could still do 2 at a time until they had a dozen children. No, limiting is not the answer. I fail to understand why the hospital went ahead with the procedure with no husband, no insurance (private) and no income apparent. That is where everything fell through in the first place. Why did the medical facility not insist on complete and thorough information from this woman? We require it for adoption. Are children born through in vitro fertilization any less valuable? I think not. Thanks for letting me air my view. Kat

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts