- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I think the last few elections oughta give ya a clue. :roll:
/FACEPALM
seriously? so there is no pendelum effect?
I think the last few elections oughta give ya a clue. :roll:
/FACEPALM
seriously? so there is no pendelum effect?
Evidence:
Last few elections.
Obama's approval rating.
Republican's approval rating.
Democratic majorities at all levels of government.
The changing demographics of the country (we are less white fundimentalist evangelical than we used to be).
The future of the Republican Party are guys like Charlie Crist, not Limbaugh.
Its not hype, its reality. Obama's approval rating is at 68%. The Republican base is now the smallest it has been since Watergate. Republicans right now have no support at all among moderates and independents.
Evidence:
Last few elections.
Obama's approval rating.
Republican's approval rating.
Democratic majorities at all levels of government.
The changing demographics of the country (we are less white fundimentalist evangelical than we used to be).
The future of the Republican Party are guys like Charlie Crist, not Limbaugh.
Last I knew you could fool most people once.
No doubt. I just seen Bush do it twice. :rofl
When Bush ran, he clearly told people what he wanted to do.
Bush was open about it.
He even made a bunch of Libs gag when he professed that Christ was the world's greatest philosopher.
Liberal Democrat to Liberal Republican and back to Liberal Democrat, mhmm, keep going...
...in sharp decline as voters develop buyer's remorse, continue....
...shares the Democrat approval rating as lower than Bush's...
...people thought they were getting rid of Liberals....oops, the voted in more liberals instead, this will cost the Left in 2 years....
Ahh and only white fundamentalists support Conservative ideals, right.....
Who?
***
All your "evidence" is crap, you have no argument.
Hmmmm... I don't recall Bush ever speaking clearly about much of anything. I seem to remember a bunch of smoke and mirrors and cowboy one-liners. But I have to admit, it was funny sometimes. I am gonna miss the deer in the headlights look and the classic ADD brain-farts.
Hogwash. Face it, the majority of Americans see you and your ideas as extremist.
You DO know that a "Neoconsevative" is a liberal with an aggressive, pro-American foerign policy, right?If you think that the Republicans of the last 8 years were "liberal", then you are so delusional that one could probably get a committal order on you.
When Bush ran, he clearly told people what he wanted to do.
Bush was open about it.
He even made a bunch of Libs gag when he professed that Christ was the world's greatest philosopher.
He did run on a clear agenda twice.
I am waiting for a specific liberal answer to the contrary. tick... tick... tick...
He did run on a clear agenda twice.
.
And The Obama will make him look like Scrooge.He ran on reducing federal spending and he grew the budget faster than any other president other than FDR and Reagan.
You DO know that a "Neoconsevative" is a liberal with an aggressive, pro-American foerign policy, right?
You'd like to think that.No, anymore neoconservative is a conservative that courts the religious right and advocates a Utopian interventionist foreign policy.
Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.
The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.
Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.
Limbaugh is embracing the line of attack, suggesting a certain symbiosis between him and his political adversaries.
WHITE HOUSE PLAN TO TORPEDO LIMBAUGH
Paul Begala, a close friend of Carville, Greenberg and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel
Rush Job: Inside Dems' Limbaugh plan - Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com
In today's show Limbaugh responded by offering a challenge to Barack Obama to debate him one-on-one!
You'll be hearing more about this major escalation of the feud.
Bush said he was a "compassionate conservative. He lied.
Bush said he would fight for the environment. He lied
Bush said he would not engage in military adventurism or nation building. He lied.
Now list for me how Obama has violated his campaign promises.
The Obama will never agree to this.In today's show Limbaugh responded by offering a challenge to Barack Obama to debate him one-on-one!
Rush has just offerd to not only fly obama for a one on one debate on his show, but has offered to pay for it......
And thanked Obama for elevating his popularity.... :lol:
My question is...should they be doing something productive for the country now that they are in power rather than still running a dirty campaign after supposedly winning so big?