• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AIG agrees to break itself up

Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
13,406
Reaction score
8,258
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
By Francesco Guerrera in New York

Published: March 1 2009 18:10 | Last updated: March 1 2009 23:34

AIG will on Monday announce a radical plan to break itself up after 90 years as a global insurance conglomerate by ceding control of its two largest divisions to the US government in exchange for a $30bn-plus lifeline.

The move, aimed at helping the stricken insurer absorb the blow of huge losses, is the third time in five months AIG has been bailed out by the authorities. Coming shortly after the third government rescue of Citigroup, the decision to save AIG could fuel mounting public anger.

The latest plan, approved by AIG’s board on Sunday, spells the end of any lingering hopes the company could survive as a standalone insurance group.

At the end of the restructuring, AIG will remain as a holding company but its main task would be to sell off or list businesses such as its US personal lines insurer, an aircraft leasing company and its global general insurance unit, and could eventually be wound down.

FULL STORY

This is HUGE news. First Citigroup and now AIG. Who's next?

EDIT: Their stock is at 0.42. Yes, forty-two cents.
 
Last edited:
All of this and more because the banking industry refuses to put a value on their bad assets so the govt. can buy them?
 
All of this and more because the banking industry refuses to put a value on their bad assets so the govt. can buy them?

Anyone with an IQ greater than an artichoke already knows the value of the assets that the banks are refusing to divulge - Somewhere between zero and a little bit more than zero.
 
All of this and more because the banking industry refuses to put a value on their bad assets so the govt. can buy them?

If they put a value on their bad assets they would be committing economic suicide.
 
Back
Top Bottom