• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Radio chip coming soon to your driver's license? Homeland Security.

Wow assume much? Where in what I posted did it translate to I have NO problem with Homeland Security? Way to put words in peoples mouths there, but as usually, you are WRONG.

I have a big problem with Homeland Security, it shouldn't exist. But the problems that are occurring now were well forseen and since most conservatives and Republicans touted HLS, you guys shouldn't be complaining. This is what you get.

Wow...I guess your aunt flo is in town today judging by your response.

Alright, Ms. Midol, tell me the then, what specifically is your problem with Homeland Security.

Fill me in since "as usually" I am so wrong.
 
Moderator's Warning:
I actually am pmsing. So unless you children want me to take it out on you play nice please.
 
Moderator's Warning:
I actually am pmsing. So unless you children want me to take it out on you play nice please.

Has any one told you how beautiful you are today?;)
 
Moderator's Warning:
I actually am pmsing. So unless you children want me to take it out on you play nice please.

Could I interest you in one of the Godiva chocolates I have on my desk? Actually, take the whole box, dear.
 
IMO, this is a great idea.
In the interest of security, we need a good national ID system.
For me - privacy be damned, I do not care as I am a law abiding citizen..
Others, they can run scared..

I agree. We do need a good national ID system. I'd prefer something that didn't need to be kept in a foil wrap and couldn't be used as a tracking device myself. But then again if you need to get lost you can always toss it out the window so I'm not hysterical about the marking of the beast yet. When they want to stick something under my thumbnail or up my butt that's when I'll loose it.
 
Could I interest you in one of the Godiva chocolates I have on my desk? Actually, take the whole box, dear.

I seriously could go for some chocolate. For now I'm making due with berry chai tea.
 
I seriously could go for some chocolate. For now I'm making due with berry chai tea.

It's my understanding that dark chocolate does some good for PMS on both the "feel good" level and chemically.
 
Ah I love my new found power. There's nothing sweeter than ass kissing. :mrgreen:

Oh you just wait till another "crucify the mods" mob forms up. You'll change your tune then. :2wave:
 
All throughout the campaign we heard the Democrats screaming about how forcing people to show ID in order to vote would impose a financial burden on the poor.

Are these same poor people going to have to now get ID's with transmitters?

Up next: guns with transmitters...
 
Last edited:
All throughout the campaign we heard the Democrats screaming about how forcing people to show ID in order to vote would impose a financial burden on the poor.

Are these same poor people going to have to now get ID's with transmitters?

Up next: guns with transmitters...

Don't joke about that. I wouldn't be surprised in the least that it's something they'd love to do if possible.
 
All throughout the campaign we heard the Democrats screaming about how forcing people to show ID in order to vote would impose a financial burden on the poor.

Are these same poor people going to have to now get ID's with transmitters?

Up next: guns with transmitters...

I would prefer guns all have an authorization link to a live webcam that an operator has to approve of before the gun goes off each time.
 
All throughout the campaign we heard the Democrats screaming about how forcing people to show ID in order to vote would impose a financial burden on the poor.

Are these same poor people going to have to now get ID's with transmitters?

Up next: guns with transmitters...

I think guns with transmitters is a decent idea, actually. How 'bout cell phones. Can't folks be located and ID'd with a cell phone or is that just a Hollywood notion? Most of us voluntarily carry those.
 
I would prefer guns all have an authorization link to a live webcam that an operator has to approve of before the gun goes off each time.

Now that's a horrible idea. If you need to use a gun in self defense I doubt you have time for an automated phone system that gives you the options in spanish first and then connects you to an operator in New Delhi.
 
Now that's a horrible idea. If you need to use a gun in self defense I doubt you have time for an automated phone system that gives you the options in spanish first and then connects you to an operator in New Delhi.

Ya but imagine all the cool youtube videos it would make of people trying to shoot rapists and failing. Oh wait... that isn't cool. /sarcasm off.
 
I would prefer guns all have an authorization link to a live webcam that an operator has to approve of before the gun goes off each time.

You might be on to something here, nah, they'd mess it up by adding a coin slot or something, like the toll booth in Blazing Saddles... ;)
 
"Sir, why is your ID wrapped in tinfoil?"

"Because the gov't is watching me!!"

Sad, but true. (And, yes, this would work).
 
Last edited:
You might be on to something here, nah, they'd mess it up by adding a coin slot or something, like the toll booth in Blazing Saddles... ;)

"Somebody's going to have to go back and get a ****load of dimes" :lol:
 
Some of you might be amazed on how fast data about someone is made available. Think for a minute when a really big story bursts how fast the networks are telling the viewers about a person, suspect or victim.
For those of you that blame our declining right to privacy on one political party you are showing your ignorance. If one party is to blame where is the outrage by the opposing party? The answer to that question is "nowhere to be found". What a technology permits we will then yield to that technologyin the nmae of a "better" America.

When Government invented the social security number, that was the day privacy become moot I think.
 
They can make a chip that will fit into my Dl but they cant make a tracking device to help me find one of the f************king 4 remotes I need to watch tv.....:roll:
 
When Government invented the social security number, that was the day privacy become moot I think.

I think I actually have to agree with you on this one. When it originally came out it was not suppose to be used for anything but for the governments census data. You were not suppose to show it to your employer or anything. (I know this because my dad's card says it right on the back but for the life of me I have yet to find anything about it on the net....) Now you literally cannot get a job legally without it. Get a loan without it. Get a bank account without it. A credit card without it. etc etc etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom