• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Charity tax limits upset man

Harry Guerrilla said:
Why isn't he going after all the "poor" people who falsely claim EITC using children that aren't even theirs.

I did taxes for a season and the abuse of EITC by poor people is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Didn't this problem stop after the IRS required social securities for every claimed dependent?

It would be logical to deduce that if you need social security numbers for dependent claims, then you'll need the same social security numbers for EITC criteria.
 
obvious Child said:
Didn't this problem stop after the IRS required social securities for every claimed dependent?

It would be logical to deduce that if you need social security numbers for dependent claims, then you'll need the same social security numbers for EITC criteria.
Click to expand...

It doesn't stop it. They just bring in the social security numbers and cards.

It works like this. One person has no kids or one kid. The other has 3 kids and can only get the most benefits off of 2 of them. So the person with 1 or no kids uses the social of the one kids with the mother or father that has 3 or more children.

They get a lot of money from the government per child and slide a little of it to the mother of three and pocket the rest.

I had to help these people do this at the tax payers expense. This fraud happens every year, nothing has stopped it.
 
American said:
Hear hear, let's jack up welfare and lower real charity, that's how we help the poor.
Click to expand...



That is it in essence.

The intent is to make those who take charity more reliant on the government..while at the same time making those who give to charity "give" more to the government thru the increase in various taxes on the basic necessities of life.


His MASSIVE spending is reliant on everyone paying more. In order to do that he needs to make it appear to everyone that they are not paying more until AFTER they have little to no recourse to undo what he has changed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom