Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Obama to Seek $75.5 Billion More for Wars in 2009

  1. #21
    Familiaist


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Last Seen
    11-16-16 @ 09:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    7,470

    Re: Obama to Seek $75.5 Billion More for Wars in 2009

    Again, the Anit-Obamites (I swear to God, I will come up with a clever name to pet name yous guys) expected this "change". Obama ran one of the greatest campaigns in recent history (not just at the Presidential level) and you think he would have done it by telling the "TRUTH".
    Bahahahahahahahahaha

    It's a said affair that American politics are won by white, and black, and orange lies.
    "I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann

  2. #22
    Professor
    WillRockwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    07-10-10 @ 09:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,950

    Re: Obama to Seek $75.5 Billion More for Wars in 2009

    Quote Originally Posted by bhkad View Post
    I wouldn't bet against your prognostication. But I hope you aren't one who sees Afghanistan as being the "Good War" we should have spent our blood and treasure fighting.

    I don't see Afghanistan or any other place as being a "good war", but it is the place we started pursuing AlQaeda. The war will not end till we catch them, in whatever country they flee to. If Bush had paid attention to his priorities, the war would be over long ago.

  3. #23
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,254

    Re: Obama to Seek $75.5 Billion More for Wars in 2009

    Quote Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post
    Again, the Anit-Obamites (I swear to God, I will come up with a clever name to pet name yous guys) expected this "change". Obama ran one of the greatest campaigns in recent history (not just at the Presidential level) and you think he would have done it by telling the "TRUTH".
    Bahahahahahahahahaha

    It's a said affair that American politics are won by white, and black, and orange lies.
    Has changlings been said before?
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •