Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 67 of 67

Thread: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

  1. #61
    Androgyne
    Dr_Patrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montana
    Last Seen
    12-16-15 @ 10:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,349
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by cherokee View Post
    It will be shot down in court if not the SC.
    You can bet someone is writing a suit against the law as we speak.
    Good and I hope it happens soon. It's absurd.

  2. #62
    Androgyne
    Dr_Patrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montana
    Last Seen
    12-16-15 @ 10:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,349
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
    do we ever do things or pass laws that later turn out to be illegal?

    Take a look at my link to the 1974 privacy act.


    If I was on that list, I sure as hell would be calling for someones head.
    Which is why it will probably be overturned soon (hopefully).

  3. #63
    Sage
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    I love your hate.
    Last Seen
    05-21-18 @ 01:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    79,753

    Re: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Either put up or shut up. It is in effect RIGHT NOW, so if it is illegal, then you should be able to take them to court to stop it.

    I guess you are ignorant to how the law works. I would have to be on that list to have legal standing to bring forth a lawsuit.

    I am sorry you do not understand even the most basic of legal tennants in this great country.


    The problem is you like spouting off it is illegal, yet don't prove otherwise.

    I did. I provided a link to what law was broken. I am sorry you don't like facts and links. I can't help those who choose to remain blind.


    YOU FAIL, now go troll elsewhere you lost, now go lick your wounds.

    Quit acting like a 5 year old going "Nuh uh", it is legal.


    How did I lose? What did you prove? What links have you provided to your "argument", and I use that term very loosley.....



    Now please stop avoiding my question:


    Also please explain why you have no issue with this, but have issues with criminal's names being released.
    Last edited by ReverendHellh0und; 02-16-09 at 04:22 PM.
    You should try to remember, ideas are conveyed by researching information, vetting sources, and confirming said information. Not by regurgitating talking points given to you by your "news" station.
    Don't hate me 'cause I'm beautiful, but hate me all the more.

  4. #64
    Devil Dog cherokee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Seen
    09-11-09 @ 10:58 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    7,486

    Re: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
    I guess you are ignorant to how the law works. I would have to be on that list to have legal standing to bring forth a lawsuit.
    I am sorry you do not understand even the most basic of legal tennants in this great country.
    I did. I provided a link to what law was broken. I am sorry you don't like facts and links. I can't help those who choose to remain blind.
    How did I lose? What did you prove? What links have you provided to your "argument", and I use that term very loosley.....
    Now please stop avoiding my question:
    Also please explain why you have no issue with this, but have issues with criminal's names being released.
    HEY where is your patch? Did you get the memo?

    http://www.debatepolitics.com/1057927450-post56.html


    50 lashes!

  5. #65
    Sage
    Harry Guerrilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Not affiliated with other libertarians.
    Last Seen
    09-01-17 @ 01:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    28,955

    Re: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Making the fact you can carry a concealed weapon public, does not infringe on your right to own a weapon.

    At no point does it stop you from owning one.
    Your right from a dry perspective but it serves no purpose.

    Why would anyone need to know you have a firearm?

    An infringement isn't necessarily a restriction either, the purpose could be to dissuade people from owning one based on social stigmas attached there in.

    Since it isn't illegal for someone not to like you carrying firearms then it can be an infringement because people can treat you differently.
    I was discovering that life just simply isn't fair and bask in the unsung glory of knowing that each obstacle overcome along the way only adds to the satisfaction in the end. Nothing great, after all, was ever accomplished by anyone sulking in his or her misery.
    —Adam Shepard

  6. #66
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 01:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Guerrilla View Post
    Your right from a dry perspective but it serves no purpose.
    Publising the names of those that have abortions -also- does not infringe on the right to same.

    The question is if you have the right to exercise your rights in private.

  7. #67
    Sage
    Harry Guerrilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Not affiliated with other libertarians.
    Last Seen
    09-01-17 @ 01:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    28,955

    Re: Inside the Newsroom: Case for gun-permit listings trumps emotional opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    Publising the names of those that have abortions -also- does not infringe on the right to same.

    The question is if you have the right to exercise your rights in private.
    You do.

    Is it reasonable to search and seize information on someones personal affairs to appeal to the emotions of do gooders.

    Of course it isn't.
    I was discovering that life just simply isn't fair and bask in the unsung glory of knowing that each obstacle overcome along the way only adds to the satisfaction in the end. Nothing great, after all, was ever accomplished by anyone sulking in his or her misery.
    —Adam Shepard

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •