Page 10 of 13 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 122

Thread: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

  1. #91
    Bus Driver to Hell
    Thorgasm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:57 PM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    68,198

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    Just a note folks, typing more words doesn't make you right.
    Quote Originally Posted by faithful_servant View Post
    Being a psychiatric patient does not mean that you are mentally ill.



  2. #92
    Familiaist


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Last Seen
    11-16-16 @ 09:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    7,470

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by Tashah View Post
    This clown is indestinguishable from any Nazi or skinhead we've seen dirty this board.
    Were yo uaround when Auftwrag was active?
    "I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann

  3. #93
    Androgyne
    Dr_Patrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montana
    Last Seen
    12-16-15 @ 11:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,349
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    What kills me is that the Leuchter report is really all Holocaust deniers have to back up their ridiculously claims. I highly recommend that people here who are interested in the Leuchter report check out the movie Mr. Death: The Rise And Fall of Fred Leuchter Jr. If you want to see first hand how insufficient his findings were that movie is a good place to start. It shows footage of him chipping the walls and you'll see that he takes far too much of the wall which dilutes the findings.

    And conquer, you talk about how important science is. If you truly held science in such high regard you'd see that science has already debunked the Leuchter report as insufficient because the data was improperly collected. You'd also see how completely improbable such a vast conspiracy like this would be.

  4. #94
    The Image b4 Transition
    Lightdemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    beneath the surface
    Last Seen
    05-31-12 @ 02:39 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,829

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    conquer, out of curiosity, do you also deny the human skin lampshades? Or is your concern strictly about the gas chambers?
    Quote Originally Posted by UtahBill View Post
    Let the public school provide the basics, you as the parent can do the fine tuning.

  5. #95
    Global Moderator
    I'm a Jedi Master, Yo

    CaptainCourtesy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    152,711

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by conquer View Post
    Look son, you showed first a great ignorance about the meaning of the word "holocaust" which clearly implies "sacrifices", and now you are showing a great ignorance of how to debate a scientific topic.

    For example, you have two apartments in a senior citizen building. One of the apartments (apartment A) is occupied by a heavy smoker and the other apartment (apartment B) by a sporadic smoker. You don't know anything about the tenants, you just go to the designated rooms to make your investigation about comsumption of cigarettes in those rooms.

    When you go to both rooms to take samples of the residual of cigarette smoke, you can easily detect who is the heavy smoker and who smoke from time to time only by the appearance of the room, but such is not enough, you need to know what kind of smoke is the one "glued" to the walls, curtains, etc.

    So, it is not only about how "scaring" the apartments look, and how many witness can give you testimonies, but also by scrapping the paint of the walls and ceilings, and taking samples from the fabric of sofas, beds, and similar, in order to make conclusions.

    You go beyond the room and you take samples scrapping the threshold of the front door, the surroundings of the hallway in front of the entrance door, and also the outside walls surrounding the windows. You also check the insulation of the room's windows and doors, if they have weather stripping installed, caulking covering any hole, any gaps in the window panes, and similar.

    After you sent to and received back the samples from the lab, you make your report, and you can conclude with "scientific evidence" that the dude living in apartment A is a heavy smoker, or that he has lots of visitors who smoke, or that the former tenant of that apartment was a heavy smoker, and so forth. You cannot establish by any means that the tenant of apartment A is a heavy smoker with the samples obtained from the lab, but for sure you can determine if cigarette was smoked in great quantities in that apartment, and the contrary can be established with the apartment B, where he can also -in assumption- can be a heavy smoker but that he opens his windows and doors when he smoke.

    In both cases, the lab reports and the insulation installed in the apartments are impartial witness which will determine how much smoke is found in the rooms and how well insulated are the apartments.

    Now well, using this method which is how the scientific method is applied, not with "fixed beliefs" but with evidence, this is how the Leutcher Report was presented and still is valid.

    You have mentioned that his report has been invalidated, and the question is, by whom? By a Jewish expert? Come on, give me a break!

    I have observed you calling me names and denying these two scientific facts, but I have never read in your messages about your scientific evidence, and this is how all your arguments fail:

    You have not a single scientific evidence to prove that those rooms were used as gas chambers. Period.

    You cry, you scream, you strongly spit out that "witness" here and "documents" there, that "everybody have accepted it", and several other irrelevant answers which have not factual support at all.

    Who cares now about all that crap when the scientific evidence says that those rooms can't ever be used as gas chambers?

    Helps us here to clarify your point.

    My point is simple and clear:

    1)- I have presented the fact that no gas accumulation was found in the walls of those rooms enough to assume that gas was used in the past to kill people.

    2)- The gaps between the doors and windows in reference to their frames would cause leaks to the point that if gas was used in those rooms, the leaks would cause the death of everybody inside the entire building.

    You can observe that these two main points are facts and not so are beliefs.


    For you to deny these facts based in science using witness is invalid and ridiculous and a stupid argument. Your argument sounds like you saying that in an accident you came out without injuries because your "fairy" protected you from harm.

    Listen now, your position is a joke until you come back and show how the doors and windows were insulated to prevent leaks in those rooms. You must come back with your lab reports showing that gas was used in those rooms enough to kill people.

    I'm not asking you to fill up again your reply with more silly propaganda about the holocaust, and that your failure to present scientific evidence is enough to declare that those rooms were never used as gas chambers.

    So, please stop babbling around, and remember that if you don't have science in your side supporting that those rooms were used as gas chambers, then accept that you have been believing in a big lie -the holocaust- for many years.

    I will appreciate very much is you finally stop acting as a silly child and reply next with the proper scientific background explaining why my point is not valid. I will enjoy your explanation about the gaps observed until today between windows and doors in reference to their frames.

    To reply saying that the Leutcher Report is not valid is not a valid answer anymore. You must show your scientific evidence.

    Best wishes.
    Moderator's Warning:
    Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence You were warned. You have chosen to ignore this warning. Leutcher is not scientific evidence; it is debunked, falaciou propaganda and has no place here. You will now receive consequences including a thread ban for trolling. Do not do this again.
    "Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run

    ====||:-D

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiseone View Post
    This is what I hate about politics the most, it turns people in snobbish egotistical self righteous dicks who allow their political beliefs, partisan attitudes, and 'us vs. them' mentality, to force them to deny reality.

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    You can't paint everone with the same brush.......It does not work tht way.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wessexman View Post
    See with you around Captain we don't even have to make arguments, as you already know everything .
    Quote Originally Posted by CriticalThought View Post
    Had you been born elsewhere or at a different time you may very well have chosen a different belief system.
    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    It a person has faith they dont need to convince another of it, and when a non believer is not interested in listening to the word of the lord, " you shake the dust from your sandels and move on"

  6. #96
    dangerously addictive
    americanwoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    17,433

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by independent_thinker2002 View Post
    Just a note folks, typing more words doesn't make you right.


    Take note gunny.



    Although I'm sure Kelzie already has.
    I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and everyone knows it.
    _____________________________________________

  7. #97
    dangerously addictive
    americanwoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    17,433

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by Arch Enemy View Post
    Were yo uaround when Auftwrag was active?
    That wacko jack-o was something else. It was fun messing with him though.
    I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and everyone knows it.
    _____________________________________________

  8. #98
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    teh holocaust is liek so fake, man!

    A janitor at the museam tole me that it was a hoax!

    and you can believe him becose he had a very nice mop, and we all know hwat thta means. right?

    hes like an expert and stuff!!!
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

  9. #99
    Familiaist


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Last Seen
    11-16-16 @ 09:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    7,470

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by americanwoman View Post
    That wacko jack-o was something else. It was fun messing with him though.
    I don't remember him debunking the Holocaust haha

    He was a good little Nazi.
    "I do not underestimate the ability of fanatical groups of terrorists to kill and destroy, but they do not threaten the life of the nation. Whether we would survive Hitler hung in the balance, but there is no doubt that we shall survive al-Qa'ida." -- Lord Hoffmann

  10. #100
    Defender of the Faith
    ludahai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Taichung, Taiwan - 2017 East Asian Games Candidate City
    Last Seen
    07-03-13 @ 02:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    10,320

    Re: Report: Holocaust denier will review evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    Fine attack the source. I really don't think there is much discussion here nor am I going to waste the effort since in your eyes the Catholic Church genuflected on.
    It is a FREAKING three-line Wikipedia stub with no details at all. Of course I am going to attack the source, especially considering Wikipedia is not the most academically rebust of sources to begin with.
    Semper Paratus
    Boston = City of Champions: Bruins 2011; Celtics 2008; Red Sox 2004, 2007; Patriots 2002, 2004, 2005
    Jon Huntsman for President

Page 10 of 13 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •