• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Just Plane Despicable 'rescued' Citi Buying $50m Jet

Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

Ya know, they set that up in Jan 08... before they got any money...

And does no one else see a problem with the government telling a private business what it does with its money?

This is why the bail out scam is so... dangerous.

Whose money do they have now?:3oops:
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

Whose money do they have now?:3oops:

That's the problem. The Feds can't run anything right, now they have their fingers in private business.

And many here are cheering that on... that's sad.
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

That's the problem. The Feds can't run anything right, now they have their fingers in private business.

And many here are cheering that on... that's sad.

Obviously citi group a private business can not run anything right either.
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

That's the problem. The Feds can't run anything right, now they have their fingers in private business.

And many here are cheering that on... that's sad.


Yes, It is.
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

Don't be pissed at Citi for buying an expensive jet.



Be pissed at the government for giving them your money.
 
Please tell us you're not going to defend or make excuses for the flagrant spending that takes place in large corporations while laying off employees.
No offense here, but what freaking business is it yours, mine or the federal government if a business wants to spend 50 million a jet or bonuses or whatever while laying people off? I mean seriously. It's a PRIVATE BUSINESS.

If you don't like how it's run... don't shop/do business with em.

It's none of our business. IF they run themselves into the ground, instead of saving them we should let em fall.

Instead we went the opposite direction.

Didn't Citi Group lay off about 10,000 recently? Not buying that jet and using the money for employment, they could have hired 1000 people at $50,000 a year.
I wasn't aware that Citi Group was required to keep jobs... is that their function? To provide a paycheck to workers? Hmmm? Is that the PURPOSE of Businesses in your mind?

corporations cannot be trusted to do anything except whatever shoves more money in executive pockets. They don't care about their country, their employees or the quality of their product.

A business that over spends on worthless items, treats it's employees bad and offers a sub par product... why they tend to fall. You have this misguided, childish view of what a business is supposed to do.


We need new trade and tax policies and an END TO CORPORATOCRACY!!
Replaced by Government Bureaucracy? No thanks, that's been tried, and fails every time. But hey, when you are stuck on "emotion" and not thought, I guess it makes sense to have the government take over.
 
No offense here, but what freaking business is it yours, mine or the federal government if a business wants to spend 50 million a jet or bonuses or whatever while laying people off? I mean seriously. It's a PRIVATE BUSINESS.

If you don't like how it's run... don't shop/do business with em.

It's none of our business. IF they run themselves into the ground, instead of saving them we should let em fall.

.

You are forgetting about something here. It is the government that prints/backs the money.
 
Citi has already answered that this purchase was set way in advance and that canceling would result in huge penalties. This plane is suppose to help reduce their air fleet, and they intend to charter it out.

See? A way around every scandal. :roll:
Maybe they can rented it out to Algore.
 
You are forgetting about something here. It is the government that prints/backs the money.

I'm forgetting nothing.

Prior to the asnine bail outs, what does it matter what others do with the money they earn. Government does NOT create wealth. Ever.
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

Ya know, they set that up in Jan 08... before they got any money...

And does no one else see a problem with the government telling a private business what it does with its money?

This is why the bail out scam is so... dangerous.
March 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/business/27bank.html?_r=2&oref=slogin

Under pressure from investors, its chairman and chief executive, Charles O. Prince III, will either layoff or reassign more than 26,000 jobs as part of a broad effort to cut costs and streamline the bank’s unwieldy global operations.

Citigroup is planning to shed 10,000 to 12,000 jobs this year, according to people briefed on the situation. Some 14,000 additional positions will be lost to attrition or relocated from high-cost locations — including London, Hong Kong and New York, where the company is based — to less expensive areas like India, Buffalo, Cincinnati and northern New Jersey.

Roughly 8 percent of the company’s 327,000 employees, fanned out across the globe, could be affected.
So they have massive layoffs in 2007 then, in January 2008 they decide to buy a new jet? Go on, please make some more excuses... :doh
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

March 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/business/27bank.html?_r=2&oref=slogin


So they have massive layoffs in 2007 then, in January 2008 they decide to buy a new jet? Go on, please make some more excuses... :doh

Why are the two incongruous? You do realize that businesses are not monolithic entities that always act in the same direction, right? Plenty of businesses hire people while losing money and vice versa.

Or, did you ever think that might be possible that the $50m cost of buying this plane was offset by the $54m they're getting from selling their two other jets?
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

Why are the two incongruous? You do realize that businesses are not monolithic entities that always act in the same direction, right? Plenty of businesses hire people while losing money and vice versa.

Or, did you ever think that might be possible that the $50m cost of buying this plane was offset by the $54m they're getting from selling their two other jets?
Well looky here, you actually did make another excuse... amazing. A normal business owner might say, gee I have to lay off or otherwise adversely effect 130k+ employess, maybe I should sell the 2 jets and fly first class, thereby saving $50 million and fire fewer people. But no, not these guys right? God forbid they should lower themselves to flying first class on *eck* commercial airlines and keep a few jobs...

Any more excuses?
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

Well looky here, you actually did make another excuse... amazing. A normal business owner might say, gee I have to lay off or otherwise adversely effect 130k+ employess, maybe I should sell the 2 jets and fly first class, thereby saving $50 million and fire fewer people. But no, not these guys right? God forbid they should lower themselves to flying first class on *eck* commercial airlines and keep a few jobs...

Any more excuses?

You're right, those are the only two options. You've just got it all figured out.

"affect"
 
No offense here, but what freaking business is it yours, mine or the federal government if a business wants to spend 50 million a jet or bonuses or whatever while laying people off? I mean seriously. It's a PRIVATE BUSINESS.
One that accepted government money to keep from going bankrupt. Obviously you don't see the problem of greed in economics. First off it's a not a private company because it is publicly traded. So it is expected to make good choices by it's shareholders and frankly, if you're buying jets and paying outrageous salaries and bonuses while your business is failing, then wouldn't you think that's a problem?

If you don't like how it's run... don't shop/do business with em.
I don't but that didn't prevent me from being effected by their bad business practices now did it?

It's none of our business. IF they run themselves into the ground, instead of saving them we should let em fall. Instead we went the opposite direction.
I agree 100%. Unfortunately Paulson and his cadre of corporatists told us how horrible the consequences would be if we didn't give them the money. MORE wrongheaded economics from the rightwing.

I wasn't aware that Citi Group was required to keep jobs... is that their function? To provide a paycheck to workers? Hmmm? Is that the PURPOSE of Businesses in your mind?
The purpose of business today or yesterday? Yesterday companies had a sense of responsibility to their employees and their community. Yesterday, corporations weren't allowed to do business in ways that are harmful to the country. Today however, the republicans convinced the sheeple that greed is good, money is all anyone needs so you better get yours anyway you can. Don't worry about the consequences because if you make enough before the business fails, well, you'll be just fine.

A business that over spends on worthless items, treats it's employees bad and offers a sub par product... why they tend to fall. You have this misguided, childish view of what a business is supposed to do.
No I have a realistic view. Wal-mart sells subpar products all day long but because we've been told we have to have things we don't need and can't afford, we buy the junk anyway. EVEN THOUGH we know that buying from wal-mart is bad for our country.

Replaced by Government Bureaucracy? No thanks, that's been tried, and fails every time. But hey, when you are stuck on "emotion" and not thought, I guess it makes sense to have the government take over.
I never said that. We need some good old fashioned protectionism with our economy. "America first" should be our motto.
 
WTF is this? I'm interested to see how Congress reacts to this bogus purchase. *wonders if I should cancel my credit card with them*
The plane was original ordered in 2005, long before the collapse. They should have shown better judgement and dump this before asking for help.
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

You're right, those are the only two options. You've just got it all figured out.

"affect"
I'm glad to see you've run out of excuses and have decided to slink away from the discussion without admitting it. ;)
 
The plane was original ordered in 2005, long before the collapse. They should have shown better judgement and dump this before asking for help.
2005? I didn't read that, perhaps you could link to that info for us...

But I'm glad to see that you've decided to side with the people on this and not the corporatists. :applaud
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

March 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/business/27bank.html?_r=2&oref=slogin


So they have massive layoffs in 2007 then, in January 2008 they decide to buy a new jet? Go on, please make some more excuses... :doh

Uhm, what business is it of YOURS how they run their business? If they want to lay off 25,000 people then give bonuses and buy a jet.. it's THEIR BUSINESS. A Private company can do whatever the hell it wants with it's money.

That's part of why these bail outs are so damned stupid, now the government and the "public" are gonna have a say in how a business runs... and socialism marches on...
 
2005? I didn't read that, perhaps you could link to that info for us...

But I'm glad to see that you've decided to side with the people on this and not the corporatists. :applaud
I heard it on the news. It's important that people understand that you don't just order a jet last week and get it this week. But they should have dumped it. Maybe they would have anyway, but I don't know that.
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

Uhm, what business is it of YOURS how they run their business? If they want to lay off 25,000 people then give bonuses and buy a jet.. it's THEIR BUSINESS. A Private company can do whatever the hell it wants with it's money.

That's part of why these bail outs are so damned stupid, now the government and the "public" are gonna have a say in how a business runs... and socialism marches on...
When you offer up your company to the public, it is no longer a PRIVATE COMPANY. Shareholders and investors have a say. If what you do with your business causes great harm to the state or it's citizens, it can be penalized. Obviously you have no conscience for corporate responsibility. According to you, corporations can do whatever the hell they want and if someone doesn't like it they can sue. But of course you'll bitch and moan about people and their frivolous lawsuits... :roll:
 
I heard it on the news. It's important that people understand that you don't just order a jet last week and get it this week. But they should have dumped it. Maybe they would have anyway, but I don't know that.
Well gee, did ya hear it from Rush or Fox? Because then I could understand why you're wrong. Despite the fact that I already provided a link that says they made the decision in 2007... :2wave:
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

I'm glad to see you've run out of excuses and have decided to slink away from the discussion without admitting it. ;)

There's just no point in wasting time trying to explain things to you.
 
Re: High-Flying Citigroup Grounds Plans for $50M Jet

There's just no point in wasting time trying to explain things to you.
Sure there is. In fact I've changed my position on things at the effective persuasion of others. Just because you have no ability to do so, mostly because you don't have a reasonable argument, doesn't make it my fault.
 
Back
Top Bottom