I'm not claiming that the new laws have prevented attacks. They might or might not have.
But you're completely dismissing the possibility which, imo, is absurd.
Miss the point, much? You're behaving as though the US Constitution intended universal and uninfringed liberty. That simply is not true.No, the defense of liberty has always been an important duty of freemen.
Yes, I am. A right to bear arms is not a right from government regulations on the possession of those arms. Just like the right to free speech ain't a right to libel or slander someone. Just like the 4th Amendment right provides protections from unreasonable searches and seizures.So you're good with gun control. K.
Don't pretend that American liberty is completely free of infringement or was intended to be free from government interference.