• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama Inauguration Sets Record for Private Jets

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
The Wealth Report - WSJ.com : Obama Inauguration Sets Record for Private Jets
According to an article in Bloomberg, as many as 600 private jets were expected to touch down in D.C. for the inauguration.
...

“That would set a record, topping the 300 the airport accommodated for President George W. Bush’s 2004 inaugural,”

Couldn't they take the train or carpool? After all this is the guy who is an Algore Global Warming believer.

Think he could have sent a memo to the effect that corporate jets are the poster boy of greed and pollution?

After all, shouldn't the prez set the example. Shouldn't His minions walk the walk?

If not his Trons first, who then?

Tsk, tsk.
 
Can you say "Carbon Offset"?
 
Anyone can say Carbon offset.
It takes a person who is genuinely concerned to actually do something about their own Carbon Imprint.
Wonder if Gore came by jet?
Big problem with Democrats, they say the words, expect the broad mass of their electorate to do what they say, but always neglect to follow their own words.
 
Obama wasn't president at the time, and even if he was, he has no control over celebrities actions. I agree that many of the celebrities attending are hypocrites, but trying to claim its Obama's fault is both false and slimy. You might appear less hyper-partisan if you at least let him actually do something as president before starting the attacks.
 
Obama wasn't president at the time, and even if he was, he has no control over celebrities actions. I agree that many of the celebrities attending are hypocrites, but trying to claim its Obama's fault is both false and slimy. You might appear less hyper-partisan if you at least let him actually do something as president before starting the attacks.
LOL.

No controlling legal authority.
He couldn't get some staffer to get on the horn to those VIP's and tell them to tow the line?
Get on board?
Leave your car at home and take mass transit?
Set an example?

Sure he could.
He could have provided leadership.
Change... even.

As for Carbon Footprints... my goal in life is to have a bigger one than Algore.
 
He couldn't get some staffer to get on the horn to those VIP's and tell them to tow the line?
Get on board?
Leave your car at home and take mass transit?
Set an example?

Do you think he even knew what the specific travel plans of every person attending were? Was he supposed to look into his crystal ball and see who was going to come in a jet?

Are you going to blame your spilled coffee on Obama next? It makes about as much sense.
 
Obama is a whipping boy for conservatives and will be far,far away from the left, wait and see.
 
Obama is a whipping boy for conservatives and will be far,far away from the left, wait and see.

Do you mean that Obama is going to take the punishment that the conservatives deserved?
 
LOL.

No controlling legal authority.
He couldn't get some staffer to get on the horn to those VIP's and tell them to tow the line?
Get on board?
Leave your car at home and take mass transit?
Set an example?

Sure he could.
He could have provided leadership.
Change... even.

As for Carbon Footprints... my goal in life is to have a bigger one than Algore.


How do you know he didn't say anything and those people just ignored him and used their freedom to do what they wanted. You are saying he should have somehow knew about it and then didn't do anything about it- back it up and prove it. Otherwise, you look rather......silly.
 
Obama wasn't president at the time, and even if he was, he has no control over celebrities actions. I agree that many of the celebrities attending are hypocrites, but trying to claim its Obama's fault is both false and slimy. You might appear less hyper-partisan if you at least let him actually do something as president before starting the attacks.
I think the word you're looking for is 'hypocricy', and the target you need to apply it to is 'the left'.
 
Economy is in huge trouble, we must take drastic action, we all must be ready to sacrifice!

The world is going to over heat, we must cut back!

Unless you're a rich liberal flying to O's inauguration, then it's okay to waste and hurt the environment... it's for a good cause.
 
Economy is in huge trouble, we must take drastic action, we all must be ready to sacrifice!

The world is going to over heat, we must cut back!

Unless you're a rich liberal flying to O's inauguration, then it's okay to waste and hurt the environment... it's for a good cause.
Yeah, it's for a good cause, cause they think they are above their moral code that they would impose on others.
 
Back
Top Bottom