• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Student auctions off virginity for offers of more than £2.5 million

I remember when this twat was on Howard Stern a while back
she got the idea from her sister who, IIRC, paid for her own masters by whoring herself out for just 3 weeks

while i have no respect for either, more power to 'em

would love to see how her future children feel when they read about it on the internet down the road:3oops:
 
DeeJayH said:
I remember when this twat was on Howard Stern a while back
she got the idea from her sister who, IIRC, paid for her own masters by whoring herself out for just 3 weeks

while i have no respect for either, more power to 'em

would love to see how her future children feel when they read about it on the internet down the road:3oops:
Click to expand...

it kind of makes you wonder about her parents, doesn't it?
 
Korimyr the Rat said:
My morals and integrity would recover, over time, from one wrongful act.

I may judge this young woman harshly for her plans, but even I understand that she will not be a whore forever.

---

It just so happens that the basest insults the English language holds are used to describe the behaviors that this women intends to engage in-- and they apply just as well, and even more derogatorily, to men who engage in the same behaviors.

A person who sells their sex is a whore.

But I will agree with you that the animosity directed against her in this thread is growing ridiculous. This is practically an Orwellian minute of hate.

---

What right? I recognize no such right, and know of no official governing body that recognizes such a right. At best, the governments that tolerate this tolerate it only under strict regulation-- and reserve the prerogative to shut it down at any time.


Don't be ridiculous. This is not an unattractive woman. She is merely doing an ugly, ugly thing.

---

It is not right because sex is an inherently personal act, and to commoditize, package, and market it otherwise is detrimental to all parties involved. It does not matter that they are "consenting adults"-- there are other parties involved, who are also damaged by the consequences of their actions.

---

I do not resent her nearly as much as others in this thread. I resent what she is doing, and the attitude with which she is doing it. If anything, I resent the people defending her conduct more than I resent her-- though with the conduct of some of the people agreeing with me, I am forced to extend a grudging acknowledgment.


I feel I have the right to condemn behaviors that I find unacceptable, and to work together with those who agree with me to have those behaviors outlawed. I have that right because, like all people, I have opinions and the capacity to express and advocate them.


I resent the implication of this question. I have made abundantly clear why I object to this behavior and why I feel so strongly about that objection. And I reject your notion that the parties to this transaction are not causing harm; not only are they causing harm to themselves, but they are causing harm to their respective families and to society itself.

The fact that she is going into a field like marriage counseling, with infidelity being the #1 cause of divorce, suggests also that she will be doing far more harm in the future.

I think it's easier for people like you to make baseless speculations about someone else's motives than to examine the arguments they have plainly stated-- and to consider for a moment that your own hedonistic and hyper-individualized moral beliefs are deeply flawed.
Click to expand...

What is not being understood here is the fact that morals are subjective, they do not necessarily hold true outside of a person's own mind. Your morals are no better than anyone else's morals, just different. It is egotistical to think otherwise, and that is not grounds for stopping anyone from doing what they want as long as it does not harm anyone else. If it is true, what you say that she is harming herself, then why would she do it? She obviously feels no harm, the choice she made is evidence enough. As far as society, that is in your mind. I do not believe she is harming society at all. Why do you feel she is? I do not like that people pass judgement on others, should it be outlawed? I do not like bald people, should it be outlawed? See the subjective rational of your thinking here? A truly rational adult understands that people can disapprove of anything, without imposing it on anyone else.

People should not live worrying about what others think. If they do, they are living someone else's life, not their own.

As far as being "hedonistic", yes I am. I want everyone to enjoy themselves as much as possible. Call me crazy for that, but we only have one life to live, this is not a practice for something bigger. Do it now, or forget it.

I applaud anyone who breaks with social norms, that is how a society moves forward.
 
Last edited:
Alex said:
What is not being understood here is the fact that morals are subjective, they do not necessarily hold true outside of a person's own mind. Your morals are no better than anyone else's morals, just different. It is egotistical to think otherwise, and that is not grounds for stopping anyone from doing what they want as long as it does not harm anyone else. If it is true, what you say that she is harming herself, then why would she do it? She obviously feels no harm, the choice she made is evidence enough. As far as society, that is in your mind. I do not believe she is harming society at all. Why do you feel she is? I do not like that people pass judgement on others, should it be outlawed? I do not like bald people, should it be outlawed? See the subjective rational of your thinking here? A truly rational adult understands that people can disapprove of anything, without imposing it on anyone else.

People should not live worrying about what others think. If they do, they are living someone else's life, not their own.

As far as being "hedonistic", yes I am. I want everyone to enjoy themselves as much as possible. Call me crazy for that, but we only have one life to live, this is not a practice for something bigger. Do it now, or forget it.

I applaud anyone who breaks with social norms, that is how a society moves forward.
Click to expand...

or backward.
 
Hatuey said:
I'm assuming a short time before she has to explain to the IRS why her revenue for that particular year was in excess of $3,000,000USD.
Click to expand...

She doesn't have to explain how she got it. She just has to let them know that she has it and pay taxes on it. As long as she pays the taxes the IRS doesn't care.
 
Korimyr the Rat said:
The fact that she is going into a field like marriage counseling, with infidelity being the #1 cause of divorce, suggests also that she will be doing far more harm in the future.
Click to expand...

What does infidelity have to do with this? She's not married as far as I can tell. Or for that matter other than that she is going into the field what does marriage have to do with this period? Again she is not married as far as I can tell. So it's not like she's debasing any part of marriage by this act. This act doesn't even have a reason to be in a marriage counseling session. So again what does her act have to do with her chosen profession?
 
DeeJayH said:
ill gotten gains?????
Click to expand...

You beat me to it. If this were true drug dealers wouldn't hide their money in mattresses, Swiss bank accounts and safes instead of American banks. I'm sure the IRS won't notice a student with 3,000,000 extra dollars to her name and wonder just how the **** it happened.
 
DeeJayH said:
do you really think the IRS does not watch the news?????????????
Click to expand...

Come on DeeJayH don't be silly. There is nothing even remotely suspicious about an university student with an income of $3,000,000+ for one year.
 
DeeJayH said:
do you really think the IRS does not watch the news?????????????
Click to expand...

So what if they do? They can't turn her in for how she got her money because of what they saw on the news. They can only turn her in for not paying her taxes for money that she has recieved. (assuming she doesn't pay her taxes of course)
 
The only way that the IRS has to do with Ill-gotten gains is by the person with the ill-gotten gains not having paid taxes on it. They are not the ones that prove or disprove weather a person has gotten Ill-gotten gains or not. It is the police that have to do this. And they have to come up with physical evidence to do this. The proper physical evidence. The only way that they can get that is by catching her in the act of recieving money for selling her body.
 
Kal'Stang said:
So what if they do? They can't turn her in for how she got her money because of what they saw on the news. They can only turn her in for not paying her taxes for money that she has recieved. (assuming she doesn't pay her taxes of course)
Click to expand...

Really? They can't turn her in for prostitution? Do you even understand that she's doing this so publicly that the IRS would have no other choice then to report her to the proper authorities for engaging in solicitation/prostitution?
 
Hatuey said:
Really? They can't turn her in for prostitution? Do you even understand that she's doing this so publicly that the IRS would have no other choice then to report her to the proper authorities for engaging in solicitation/prostitution?
Click to expand...

Read post #139. By the time that the IRS will get anywhere near that money she will already have gotten the money. Which means it will be too late for the police to do anything about catching her in the actual act.
 
Basically the only chance that any has of catching her in the act and thereby being able to be prosecuted is for police to follow her every move. And legally they can't do that because she has not done anything illegal yet. Unless they pin down the exact hour and day that this is going to transpire they are. to put it bluntly, S.O.L.
 
Kal'Stang said:
Basically the only chance that any has of catching her in the act and thereby being able to be prosecuted is for police to follow her every move. And legally they can't do that because she has not done anything illegal yet. Unless they pin down the exact hour and day that this is going to transpire they are. to put it bluntly, S.O.L.
Click to expand...

There's nothing the police could prosecute her for though. Prostitution? She just gets employed at her sisters former place (Bunny Ranch), pays the taxes for the income and everything is legal.
 
Kal'Stang said:
Basically the only chance that any has of catching her in the act and thereby being able to be prosecuted is for police to follow her every move. And legally they can't do that because she has not done anything illegal yet. Unless they pin down the exact hour and day that this is going to transpire they are. to put it bluntly, S.O.L.
Click to expand...

Or if they really wanted to be dicks they'd just outbid everyone, show up at the time and place they discuss and bust her.

Assuming she doesnt go through the B ranch.
 
I predict men will start doing this same stunt this year. She isn't the first to do this and won't be the last. I believe she is about the 3rd or 4th to make mainstream news though. I doubt she is a virgin. Most pople who stay celibate that long do so for reasons of substance.
 
Why all this talk about the IRS? She is in England. LOL.
 
danarhea said:
Why all this talk about the IRS? She is in England. LOL.
Click to expand...

I must have missed that ... :shock:

Erm, isn't that illegal in UK?

Lets all look on the bright side, if she is from UK. Gov. will tax her ALOT :rofl
 
danarhea said:
Why all this talk about the IRS? She is in England. LOL.
Click to expand...

She isn't in England. The article is from the Telegraph, which is a UK publication. In the article it says she lives in San Diego, California.
 
Maximus Zeebra said:
Is her shoulder dislocated? Also look at the tiny breasts compared to the huge arms, and that begging look of a lying sob.
She does look a bit transsexual in the face still, but not as much as the other pic, do you not agree?
Click to expand...

No, in that second pic, her face looks a little like mine when I was younger. I don't think it looks "transexual", although I do detect the shadow of a girly-mustache, but so what, lots of chicks have them.
The reason I said that although it looks like she's cropped her head and pasted it on a different body, I don't think that's actually the case, is that I agree with you: the face is better than the body.
It's not a horrible body, but the biceps are large- whether fat or muscular, I can't tell- the breasts aren't very big in proportion to the body, and the shoulder is sort of hunched or thrown out in an awkward way.
That's not a body you'd want to paste your face onto if you were trying to convince others to pay money to have sex with you.
Ergo, I'm sure it's her real body.
There's nothing wrong with it, per se (except the excessive amount of yellow self-tanner), and there's nothing wrong with the face either (except the excessive amount of chalky foundation makeup which doesn't match the rest of her skin). She's got your typical, average-hot, girl-next-door look. Go into any strip club, you'd see a dozen of her walking around.
Admittedly though, in the first picture on this thread- the headshot in the OP- she looks pretty gruesome, and I can't believe she ever allowed such a shot to see the light of day, much less fall into the media's hands.
That's why they invented digital cameras... so that we can simply delete such unflattering images of ourselves.
 
Last edited:
(1st post glad to be here):2wave:

When I see her pictures and e-mail address here:
Meet Natalie Dylan...

I do not think she's a virgin.

I think this is a sham, and she'll get rich doing it.

:roll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom