• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama climate czar has socialist ties

Renae

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
50,241
Reaction score
19,243
Location
San Antonio Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
Until last week, Carol M. Browner, President-elect Barack Obama's pick as global warming czar, was listed as one of 14 leaders of a socialist group's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for "global governance" and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.

By Thursday, Mrs. Browner's name and biography had been removed from Socialist International's Web page, though a photo of her speaking June 30 to the group's congress in Greece was still available.

Socialist International, an umbrella group for many of the world's social democratic political parties such as Britain's Labor Party, says it supports socialism and is harshly critical of U.S. policies.

The group's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, the organization's action arm on climate change, says the developed world must reduce consumption and commit to binding and punitive limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Washington Times - Obama climate czar has socialist ties

Ah yes, the real reason liberals back the AGW Movement.
 
So what !
I don't care if he is a communist homosexual, as long as this man does the job and keeps things that matter not covered up..
 
OH NO!

Is there anyway I can get my vote back!? I think I just sentenced our climate to, at least, 4 years of turmoil with the election of Obama. Socialists hate the environment.
 
Uhh climate change has what to do with socialism, exactly?
 
So what !
I don't care if he is a communist homosexual, as long as this man does the job and keeps things that matter not covered up..
You mean like the previous Democrat president?
 
Uhh climate change has what to do with socialism, exactly?
Climate change is a socialist scheme to insert more and more government into our lives. To control and manipulate behavior.

Too bad it's junk science. When they can't figure out how to use water vapor in climate models... water vapor being clouds... the models are tragically flwed and useless.

Let's say it is true... are the bajillions wasted on the pursuit of controlling the climate (so absurd LOL) the best way to spend the bajillions? Bjorn Lomborg, a greenie, Green peacenik and economist.... says absolutely not.
 
Last edited:
Uhh climate change has what to do with socialism, exactly?
Ugh... you see... the socialist nominated has as her grand vision... the use of "climate change" as an adjunct to "Change" a'la socialismus variety. It reflects on The Obamer and his grand scheme... you see?

Get it?

Didn't think so.
 
Climate change is a socialist scheme to insert more and more government into our lives. To control and manipulate behavior.

And also to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids. :lol:
 
Global cooling and global warming is an old Marxist scare concept (rooted in 60`s and 70`s science fiction) to control capitalism.





Judi Barri
Earth First

"I think if we don't overthrow capitalism, we don't have a chance of saving the world ecologically. I think it is possible to have an ecological society under socialism. I don't think it's possible under capitalism."



Richard Benedict
an employee for the State Department working on assignment for the Conservation Foundation

"A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect."
 
The world getting warmer and colder is a scare tactic?
Bahahhahaha
We're so screwed.
 
The Cooling World
Newsweek, April 28, 1975





There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production – with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now. The regions destined to feel its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of Canada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a number of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas – parts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and Indonesia – where the growing season is dependent upon the rains brought by the monsoon.



Newsweek on the cooling world
 
And also to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids. :lol:
:)

With this as a rebuttal, I see you "get it" too.

That's the "Change" the Obamer didn't let onto except for his associations... "guilt by association" let's say and during unscripted moments as "Joe the Plumber" moment about "spreading the wealth" through tax and redistribute government schemes. Add to this his utterly numb statement about not being able to "keep our houses at 72 degrees regardless of the season, drive SUV's and eat what we want without angering the rest of the world" (that being a very close paraphrase instead of a direct quote.

Conservatives know what the Omaber is.
WE... "connected the dots".
S..O...C...I...A...L...I...S...T
 
Last edited:
AGW is a politically motivated movement that exist only as an excuse to further the liberal-socialist cause of "more bureaucracy, more regulations, bigger government". It is merely the democrat-equivalent of the republican "terrorist-scare-tactic of 2004". No one should be scared into voting for a candidate on the basis of "we have to save the planet! OOOOH"! I don't even want to save the planet. Even if this "AGW" had ANY empirical evidence going for it beyond the made up "models", I still wouldn't want to "save the planet"! I'm tired of freezing-cold winters and I wouldn't mind being closer the ocean, and by the time anyone gets green-hosed to death from the loss of atmosphere, I'd be long dead. So, from the words of Maddox: "I don't give a ****!"
 
The Russians expect a new Ice Age. It's on Drudge, if you want to find the link.


Yeah...always trust the vodka swilling "Russkies" to give us a clear view on science (Melting Nuke anyone?)


Haaaaaaaaaaaaa.....Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...
 
:)

With this as a rebuttal, I see you "get it" too.

That's the "Change" the Obamer didn't let onto except for his associations... "guilt by association" let's say and during unscripted moments as "Joe the Plumber" moment about "spreading the wealth" through tax and redistribute government schemes. Add to this his utterly numb statement about not being able to "keep our houses at 72 degrees regardless of the season, drive SUV's and eat what we want without angering the rest of the world" (that being a very close paraphrase instead of a direct quote.

Conservatives know what the Omaber is.
WE... "connected the dots".
S..O...C...I...A...L...I...S...T

Umm...learn to speak in proper English so that people have some idea wtf you're talking about. Not that I think it would matter, as your posts don't ever seem to have any kind of coherent thought. Joe the Plumber? What in God's name are you babbling about?
 
drive SUV's and eat what we want without angering the rest of the world"


Gee....sounds like class envy and warfare to me .
 
I love the sarcasm in this thread. Here, let me use some too.

Wait, I'm so confused! All the wonderful, intelligent, reasonable liberals kept telling those mean old conservatives that said that Obama wanted to move the country towards socialism that they were just stupid. Obama didn't support socialist views, he just supported democratic views. He'd never actually do anything to push the country to becoming a socialist.

I mean, they kept saying that but....then he appoints a socialist.

Hell, isn't the fact that George Bush had a bunch of Neocons around him exactly what STARTED the call that he was a neocon. Those claims came looooong before Iraq came about. They weren't as mainstream, but they were there. It just happened that the next few years proved it true.

Are we not to think that when Obama then goes and starts putting Socialists on his cabinet that somehow we're NOT going to see some socialist ideas and laws come out in regards to the environment?
 
Are we not to think that when Obama then goes and starts putting Socialists on his cabinet that somehow we're NOT going to see some socialist ideas and laws come out in regards to the environment?

What exactly ARE socialist ideas as they pertain to the environment? Was Teddy Roosevelt a socialist? Richard Nixon? John McCain?
 
I find the mention of the UK labour party intresting given how it produced the neocons favorite primininster Tony Blair. It hardly radical. Frankly im quite disapointed:mrgreen:
Let me help you.

Yes, the mention of the UK Labour party... the same Blair that was bosom buddies with a certain Bill Clinton. What changed that? A handful of planes flying into buildings or attempting to.

You see, not all socialists are blind and lovey-dovey to the threat of Islamo-fascist terrorist types. Obama seems to be, so you could say that I know Tony Blair, and Mr. Obamer is no Tony Blair.

Some actually can identify a serious threat, connect-the-dots and act in an sane fashion. Obamer hasn't shown this depth of character.

Tony Blair on the other hand was one of these individuals who has the basic instincts to see a threat and knows what the response is. Now Tony wouldn't have tons in common with Bush on much else (then again, I'll digress and say Bush has been too liberal-socialist). In any event, Blair saw the same threat Bush did and figured it would be best to act than react.

Blair did after all say past methods of dealing with the middle east and their thugs has proven it was the wrong path.

Sane men just don't keep doing the same things expecting a different result (Israel Palestine for instance)... unless you're a peacenik, pacifist idealogue living in the land of Utopian dreams. Then you do, and get millions killed in the process.
 
What exactly ARE socialist ideas as they pertain to the environment? Was Teddy Roosevelt a socialist? Richard Nixon? John McCain?

Hehehe, if you have to ask that question... you really need to go over the entire issue again. Really.

Socialist of the ilk this gal is weaved from, see environmental concerns as a means to and end. I.E. by imposing more government control in the name of the earth, they can further the goal of a truly socialist one world government. One that "protects" all of us from ourselves, from poverty, from sickness... and they'll be in charge, people are too stupid and dangerous to be allowed to live their lives, they need the steady, benevolent hand of a smart government to live life right.


And ya these people really think that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom